[quote]ultralars wrote:
Someone is messing with my posts… first it deleted " sunk " from my last reply and it wont let add it in… atleast not imidiantly. somone has messed with the title too [/quote]
I didn’t notice until you brought it up bats eyelashes
Couldn’t agree more.
[quote]roybot wrote:
Couldn’t agree more.[/quote]
Cute
there should be more people like TheBodyGuard discussing in this thread.
[quote]Kanada wrote:
[quote]Cheeky_Kea wrote:
[quote]Kanada wrote:
Being a blind person, I’m thankful that I am part of the master race. I’ve always tried to think of humans like squirrels. There are red ones, black ones, grey ones. They don’t seem to cross breed. Since all humans can cross breed, that makes humanity the master race of humans. Because we aren’t the only member of the Homo genus, we would be, naturally, the superior homo. So then we spread across the world AND FORGOT HOW TO COMMUNICATE! Enter, self aggrandizing meglomaniacs. Result? Confusion[/quote]
Confusion…yesssssss…lots of confusion in this post, superior blind homo squirrel.
[/quote]
Your ignorance and lack of comprehension is astounding. Humans are one race, not many. Pigmentation and body types are a result of genetic variability. THerefore, the HOMO SAPIEN (I assume you have absolutely no scientific background at this point) is the superior species within the Homo genus, which includes homo erectus, homo Neanderthal, and several others which you are likely not familiar with. Neither am I. However, my point was that with the inability of humanity to effectively communicate with each other, confusion and fear ensues which wreck havoc on the world. Capice?[/quote]
My lack of comprehension and ignorance astound me as well.
I am humbled, your post is so advanced I would definitely need a scientific background to understand you.
However as an aside, when speaking to people you find to be way beneath you (I’m guessing you are thinking of me as one of your little “squirrels”) you may find that TYPING IN CAPS does not actually render your point more salient nor your argument more cogent.
I will concur that your point is well made in regards to the inability of humanity to effectively communicate, as this series of fairly useless verbal dirrahoea will attest to.
[quote]ultralars wrote:
[quote]roybot wrote:
Couldn’t agree more.[/quote]
Cute
there should be more people like TheBodyGuard discussing in this thread.[/quote]
Spot on as always.
Roybot, you’re fucking hilarious.
Brilliant.
The O.P’s more general point that the divide between “the good guys” and “the bad guys” may not be black and white is so commonplace and obvious as to have become a hackneyed cliche used in popular culture and discussion and the subject of many an entralling movie blockbuster.
It was perhaps not stated in the best fashion and the way it is worded is bound to raise a few hackles.
Ie. Germany coming off in a worst light than deserved etc, is just the wrong emphasis. There is no “better light” for the systematic genocide of millions.
However, arguing that the “good guys” aren’t always squeaky clean is entirely sound and in alot of cases is historicaly, demonstrably true.
The evil that men do isn’t the singular provenance of the figures that history demonises.
Still relevant but on a tangent.
It has been noted many times that the language of the Nazi propaganda machine wass worded to dehumanise the Jewish people into abstracts which ultimately facilitates the ease of treating them inhumanely.
Thus they were often referred to as some kind of “virus” that needed to be “eradicated” or the Jewish “problem” that needed to be “solved” or some kind of infection of the German people that needed to be “treated”.
So much easier for the Conscience to eradicate a malignant virus than slaughter millions of innocent people, so much easier to merely, innocuously solve a problem.
To quote Voltaire…“Anyone who has the power to make you believe absurdities has the power to make you commit atrocities”.
Serious post over…I return you to your normal lolzfest channel.
[quote]TheBodyGuard wrote:
Should two retards be allowed to bear children? If not, where then do you draw the line when we have so many “functioning retards” within our society (cue the White Family from West Virginia - google it).
[/quote]
LOL. The Wild and Wonderful Whites of West Virginia…a hilarious train-wreck of a documentary.
I am having them, this thread is delivering them.
I want to say more things to anger the OP to see what other analogies he can come up with for how hard is to explain stuff to me (and Ryobot).
“It’s like teaching brain surgery to a pair of dingo’s kidneys!” etc. etc.
[quote]Nards wrote:
I want to say more things to anger the OP to see what other analogies he can come up with for how hard is to explain stuff to me (and Ryobot).
“It’s like teaching brain surgery to a pair of dingo’s kidneys!” etc. etc.[/quote]
Come on Nards grow up…srsly…with you it’s like trying to explain the phase invariance of an EM wave in special relativity to a brain injured, partially lobotomised three toed sloth with a learning disability and a history of familial retardation who also isn’t very bright at maths. 
[quote]Cheeky_Kea wrote:
The O.P’s more general point that the divide between “the good guys” and “the bad guys” may not be black and white is so commonplace and obvious as to have become a hackneyed cliche used in popular culture and discussion and the subject of many an entralling movie blockbuster.
It was perhaps not stated in the best fashion and the way it is worded is bound to raise a few hackles.
Ie. Germany coming off in a worst light than deserved etc, is just the wrong emphasis. There is no “better light” for the systematic genocide of millions.
However, arguing that the “good guys” aren’t always squeaky clean is entirely sound and in alot of cases is historicaly, demonstrably true.
The evil that men do isn’t the singular provenance of the figures that history demonises.
Still relevant but on a tangent.
It has been noted many times that the language of the Nazi propaganda machine wass worded to dehumanise the Jewish people into abstracts which ultimately facilitates the ease of treating them inhumanely.
Thus they were often referred to as some kind of “virus” that needed to be “eradicated” or the Jewish “problem” that needed to be “solved” or some kind of infection of the German people that needed to be “treated”.
So much easier for the Conscience to eradicate a malignant virus than slaughter millions of innocent people, so much easier to merely, innocuously solve a problem.
To quote Voltaire…“Anyone who has the power to make you believe absurdities has the power to make you commit atrocities”.
Serious post over…I return you to your normal lolzfest channel.
[/quote]
If you count only by human deaths, the mognethau plan technically was worse than the holocaust, as 9 million+ died, 1,2 of which died in work camps. while the holocaust killed 6 million, in which all died in work camps or death camps.
Now that one hits too close to home. I’m leaving and never coming back to this thread until I come back.
[quote]Nards wrote:
Now that one hits too close to home. I’m leaving and never coming back to this thread until I come back.[/quote]
Wow thats really funny and clever
In my experience nordic people (icelandic in particular) are pretty in to their genetic heritage.
A lot of times they talk about their Viking heritage with pride and vanity, depicting Vikings as the fiercest and most admirable warriors.
There is nothing to be proud of, because you have done nothing as a ‘viking’ or a ‘warrior’ or whatever.
This is just thoughtless cultural ‘I-am-better-then-you-due-to-coincidence’ bias
I think that comes from a lack of empathy for people who were accidentally born from other parents.
And the lack of empathy comes from emotional scarring that occurred in childhood
Just sayin’
btw I’m a swedish descendant of Thor himself so I can talk shit about my own kind 
[quote]Erasmus wrote:
In my experience nordic people (icelandic in particular) are pretty in to their genetic heritage.
A lot of times they talk about their Viking heritage with pride and vanity, depicting Vikings as the fiercest and most admirable warriors.
There is nothing to be proud of, because you have done nothing as a ‘viking’ or a ‘warrior’ or whatever.
This is just thoughtless cultural ‘I-am-better-then-you-due-to-coincidence’ bias
I think that comes from a lack of empathy for people who were accidentally born from other parents.
And the lack of empathy comes from emotional scarring that occurred in childhood
Just sayin’
btw I’m a swedish descendant of Thor himself so I can talk shit about my own kind ;)[/quote] the Icelanders are descendants of the Norwegian vikings, no relation to you. They dont talk of the viking with pride because what they did, they talk of vikings with pride because of what they where, strong, proud and brave. which because they are related, also probably lies within them, look at Jón Páll Sigmarsson.
I’m 100% Mongol. I’d murder a Viking, rape his wife, then salt his fields for good measure, all while tearing my way across his country and conquering all of his people.
[quote]ultralars wrote:
[quote]Nards wrote:
Now that one hits too close to home. I’m leaving and never coming back to this thread until I come back.[/quote]
Wow thats really funny and clever[/quote]
I concur. ^
[quote]ultralars wrote:
[quote]Erasmus wrote:
In my experience nordic people (icelandic in particular) are pretty in to their genetic heritage.
A lot of times they talk about their Viking heritage with pride and vanity, depicting Vikings as the fiercest and most admirable warriors.
There is nothing to be proud of, because you have done nothing as a ‘viking’ or a ‘warrior’ or whatever.
This is just thoughtless cultural ‘I-am-better-then-you-due-to-coincidence’ bias
I think that comes from a lack of empathy for people who were accidentally born from other parents.
And the lack of empathy comes from emotional scarring that occurred in childhood
Just sayin’
btw I’m a swedish descendant of Thor himself so I can talk shit about my own kind ;)[/quote] the Icelanders are descendants of the Norwegian vikings, no relation to you. They dont talk of the viking with pride because what they did, they talk of vikings with pride because of what they where, strong, proud and brave. which because they are related, also probably lies within them, look at JÃ?³n PÃ?¡ll Sigmarsson.
[/quote]
Yes. Just look at him.
