I’ve lived in the South my whole life, so it’s no surprise anymore…but yep.
I was asked, in a job interview, about how I felt about working with minorities. I told them that I grew up (in this city), had played football into college, played basketball and sprinted and jumped in high school track, and boxed. I said I had been a minority my whole life, and that was it for the questioning on that.
13% do 50% is real. Its why black crime is high. When jews came to ghe US they had way higher crime stats than whites. When Italian came ghey did too.
Black Americans who descended from slaves havefaved hubdredz of years of forced illiteracy anx slavery and terror.
Then forced to live in ghettos and red lined and held back from generational wealth. Its a socio economic issue.
Asians havent faced anything like what Americanshave in the US. A similar comparison would be North Africans in France or Jews in Russia or Kurds in Turkey.
Jews in Russia are like 20x more likely to be involved in organized crime than ethnic slavs per capita. Because they werekept out of evefythibg except money lending. Almost all the top positions in the russian mobs are held by jews.
Similarly turkish crime is ran by kurds. They are twice as likely to go to prison. Etc.
Black people face material and social conditions that create aelf replicating conditions through cyclical grnerational stunting. Same for native americans.
I come from an ethnic minority in the old world and escaped as rdfugees when i was a child. We settled in England. Then spent a decade all over Europe. Ive been to the US too though we didnt stay.
Id say the US is better on a personal level than Europe. But the way the state has created inequality in the past has assured the plight of natuves and black descendants of slavery today.
I actually find Americans much nicer than the stereotype and brits much ruder than theirs. When i was young we went over to live there with my Dad. We lived in a predominantly black area and the way i saw police interact with black people reminded me of my memories as a young child of policd harassing my mother and brothers in the street and freightening them.
I thibk due to my experiences as a boy the way i see black people treated in the west resonates with me very strongly. And my experiences in the west being otherised treated like shit despite being white which steered me to a path of prison and gangsterism. Makes me understand why the black community in the west is the way it is.
If you dont feel part of society you have no stake in that society. If teachers and authority figures treat you like firt you never feel that is open to you.if every interaction you have with police is awful you dobt respect the law or those who uphold it.
Didnt whites literally invade and colonize south africa? Lol. Its like moanibg jews are killing roman invaders of judea. They are settlers. Native americans were justified in killing ruropean colonizers. Only white people play ghe vixtim while living off the spoils of genocide.
My people were genocided. If the genociders were still here with all the wealth and power wed be killing them too.
This doesn’t really hold up if you’re 400 years past the aggression. Nobody is justified in killing anyone unless they’re a threat to their life or liberty. Im not justified in killing a random German just because their grandfathers enslaved mine.
And Jews had what, over 2,000 years of that, plus a genocide less than a century ago. Why aren’t they committing crime at an incredibly high disproportionate rate?
The Chinese worked like slaves doing the most dangerous work building the transcontinental railroad, hence the phrase a chinaman’s chance, were victims of mass lynchings and faced institutional racism that culminated in the Exclusion Act and yet, why aren’t they out killing on a daily basis?
Social conditions from within, or from the outside?
Poverty is a poor excuse for violent crime. Wealthy people commit crimes as well, and not just white collar crime but violent crime. Middle class whites commit violent crime. It’s not the criminality that should be talked about but rather the pervasiveness of it. In short, blacks do not commit a high amount of violent crime because of poverty but because of values, or a lack thereof. Money won’t cure poor parenting. Has free shit from the government solved anything? People in the inner cities have low cost to free housing. Free food. Free cash. Free phones. Etc. Real poor people have dirty water, if they have water at all, get their food from garbage dumps, and sleep on dirt floors.
No. People who were white settled in what is now known as South Africa. They were not the first to do so however. The Bantu conquered other peoples as they moved south into what we call South Africa. But they are not called conquerers or colonizers; it gets referred to as expansion or settling. It was just a natural migration.
Explaining things idnt excusing them. Its two options.blacks are genetically predisposed to crime or its a socioeconomic cause. Ehich fo you think it is?
Are black people genetic criminals or does environment cause crime disparities?
Were jews gebetically predisposed to crime in russia or did conditiond drive them into crime?
You can deny stats all you want. If you think blacks just choose to be criminals way more than whites then thats a racist position no sociologist agrees with.
Sorry do you think its been hundreds of years since black people were treated like shit lol? Black civil rights were won in the fucking 60s. That is 60 years ago. People who were water hosed and savaged by dogs for wanting top use white water fountains are still alive. How are you this ignorant?
But its an ongoing settler colonial project. Im sorry but just because time passes does not make evil dissapear. If that is the case then all evil regimes need to do is conquer and hold territory for as long as possible and then their rule is legitimate. If Hitler had held France and half of Europe and the Germans occupied them for 200 years, French blowing German settlers up would be absolutely justified morally.
This is actually a great point Frantz Fanon makes about European history. You don’t get to be the most ruthless violent people, conquer the globe then go OK starting from right now violence to settle disputes is wrong and off the table. Thats not up to the conquerors and colonizers to decide. Jews fought the Romans constantly and they never relinquished their claims to their land. They died as martyrs rather than submit.
In South Africa white Settlers still control almost the entire economy, own almost all the fertile land and own almost all the property. Apartheid ending just put a black face on the same power structure. Mandela is widely disliked by Black Africans for basically allowing the colonizers to keep everything.
White South Africans have a right to live there, they were born there. But the wealth they have is a direct result of colonization and stolen land. They need to relinquish that stolen wealth. Nazis had to give the gold and paintings back to the jews they stole it from after the war. They got death penalties for war crimes. The country was dismantled and controlled by the victors.
In south africa the bad guys got to keep everything, never spent a day in jail and still control the economy and over 80% of the land. White people don’t like acknowledging this because we all benefit from the colonial destruction of Africa which was used to extract resources to feed out industrialization while keeping the third world underdeveloped. And to acknowledge that south africas apartheid system needs dismantling would make us look at our own nations wealth accumulation and if we were honest wed say we all benefited from the rape and pillaging of Africa, India and the new world and its why we have the comfort we do now compared to the rest of the world.