Scripture doesn’t teach about the papacy (man made tradition does though). Anyways, I am not attacking Catholic beliefs and am not trying to start an argument (so forgive me please BC and Pat), but I do not believe in the Vicar of Christ, and therefore papal infallibility. Neither does ZEB.[/quote]
Yeah, that (among other things) separates Trib, you and I from the Catholics on the board. But with that said I have a great respect for Catholicism and the various stands that they’ve taken through the years to hold the line on traditional values.
You did it again!! WOW…I just accused you of projecting and HERE IT IS thrown back at me. Do you ever ever have an original thought? LMAO…I have to share your idiocy with my wife she too will get a kick out of your shear ignorance. LOL…You are the gift that just keeps giving.
[/quote]
Maybe you didn’t notice ya lil mouth breather, but my post was FIRST.
Such a frikkin retard. I’m sure your wife isn’t much brighter.
Says the man who cannot understand the concept that an imperfect sinful man can pollute each and every doctrine shown him. Do you realize how many posts that it has taken me to get you to understand just this one little thing? Not agree with it, just UNDERSTAND IT. You are a very strange mix of hubris and ignorance. A very bad combination indeed.
[/quote]
My God, pun intended, you’re a broken record. Are YOU drinking? You thought the first time you used “a strange mix of hubris and ignorance” it was so good you’d use it again? Let me guess, you just learned how to use “hubris” in a sentence recently?
So are you saying that scripture is polluted?
What about the infallibility of the Pope? Are you up to the task of defending certain Papal careers? [/quote]
Scripture doesn’t teach about the papacy (man made tradition does though). Anyways, I am not attacking Catholic beliefs and am not trying to start an argument (so forgive me please BC and Pat), but I do not believe in the Vicar of Christ, and therefore papal infallibility. Neither does ZEB.[/quote]
Fair enough.
How about in the infallibility of those that wrote the scriptures?
You’re a pathetic little man. I feel sorry for you. And I’m not joking.[/quote]
What you’ve done here is something that your Psychologist would call projecting. Ask him about it on your next visit. And no charge man.
You are right (a first I believe) there is no scientific means to judge it. And you can’t play basketball with a hockey puck (at least not very well). Science is about science and faith is about faith. When idiots like you show up on the board pushing Christians to “prove” the
existence of God you are trying to measure something that is immeasurable. And the funniest part is that you are trying to do it with your little brain. And I mean that in a broad sense as well as you specifically having a little brain.
And finally, that’s why I’ve said from the beginning that spiritual matters are about faith. As the Bible says it is impossible to please God without faith.
You’re doing it again. You are spewing back lines that I’ve used on you. No really how dumb is that? You are the king man. Thank you…lol I’m practically falling off my chair laughing at you. Oh man…keep it up.
Not true genius (I’ll be watching if you call me genius in return:) if man writes and then follows said “evil” doctrine. So once again man being inherently evil will find ways to do evil. And he will do it in the name of God, or in the name of his motorcycle group. It doesn’t matter.
Grrrr…but who wrote the doctrine genius? And most importantly who is interpreting said doctrine? LMAO oops you didn’t think that far ahead did you? Oh that’s a shame huh?..you have to learn to think ahead. Wait…you have to learn to just think.
That doesn’t really matter because man will use whatever means possible to do evil. Be it through mans misinterpretation of scriptures, or through his own ideology. DUHHHHH do you follow yet? You are cracking me up with this blather.
I’m going to once again guess that he’d help you with your OCD, porno addiction and alcoholism. If you ask me again I’ll probably say something similar as I really think he would help you if you would cry out to him instead of trying to do it yourself. We both know that you’ve made a mess of your life so far. So why not give it a try things can only get better from here for you if you try.
[/quote]
ZEB you’re pathetic.
Are you admitting that scripture is written by man and is fallible? [/quote]
Oh my gosh please tell me you’re kidding. No really. Do I have to actually say it again? OMG.
I will but…I just can’t get over your blind stupidity.
Here we go for something like the 8th time you very, very stupid man.
MAN is inherently evil. This really doesn’t have anything to do with anything else. I know you want to attack Christianity but this has to do with man, nothing else. MAN!! Do you get it? MAN IS INHERENTLY EVIL. Therefore, when he reads scripture, a history book, a comic book whatever, he, as in MAN errs.
Now before you do anything else, tell me you understand this. You don’t have to agree but at least understand it. No one can be this stupid. Really.
No, I nailed it. I said it to you two posts later you said it back to me. You repeat what other people say. Cortes also accused you of this on another thread. It’s what you do. I think it’s what all dumb people do who are at a loss for words.
Ha ha…I know the truth is really hard to swallow sometimes. But you’ve been pretending too long around here and it’s about time someone called you on it. We had a meeting and I volunteered. So you are either going to have to put up with having your inane posts exposed or stop posting. And knowing that you are OCD we both know that you won’t stop posting so here we are and here we will be for a very long time to come.
Having fun yet? I am.
[/quote]
You’re easily entertained faggot.
And why do you interpret any question about Christianity as an attack? Attack (weakly) is what you’re doing tree jumper.
Let’s see if we can get you back on track ya lil retard. Who wrote scripture? You said “if man writes and follows”. Explain.
And really lil swollen nipple dude, read the thread ya retard, I said projection first. It’s there in black white and red ya lil fucktard. My post first, yours follows.
Says the man who cannot understand the concept that an imperfect sinful man can pollute each and every doctrine shown him. Do you realize how many posts that it has taken me to get you to understand just this one little thing? Not agree with it, just UNDERSTAND IT. You are a very strange mix of hubris and ignorance. A very bad combination indeed.
[/quote]
So are you saying that scripture is polluted?[/quote]
Hahahahaha…LMAO you’re kidding me, come on (looks for a hidden camera). At this point a 5 year old would understand a simple sentence, that is man is inherently evil but not you. WOW-----WOW!
[/quote]
Can you address scripture or not? Or are you just going to avoid it like you avoided your curious statement about god’s limited ability to communicate?
[quote]TheBodyGuard wrote:
If you were standing in front of me now, I’d slap you like the mouthy bitch that you are and send you on your way.[/quote]
YES! You did it.
You threatened to beat me up. Just like in that other thread you were on where you wanted to meet yet another person who thought you were a fraud. It went something like this (not verbatim):
“I live in Jersey, you live in Jersey? We can meet. I don’t pretend to know how to box but I’ve had my share of fights. You want to try me?”
LOL you are priceless man! You are the very definition of message board warrior. You are it. I don’t know how you sink any lower. I am just enjoying the heck right out of this whole confrontation.
Say more dumb stuff the night is till young.
[/quote]
Fucktard, you’d have to be a man to get beat up. I said I’d slap you like a woman. You have female ways. Females get on the internet and bitch about each other and insult each other. They get on the phone and argue. You are a bitch. In fact, I made the ASSumption that you’re a man. Perhaps that’s where I went astray. Yes, I convinced, you ARE a woman. Excuse me ma’am, but your slip is showing.
[quote]ZEB wrote:
You can’t even understand this…wow. It’s a simple courtesy that I’m paying to DD. He, like everyone else, should be made aware that you are a total fraud. [/quote]
You’re a chorus of one ZEB. And a broken record of strawmen and ad hominems. You’re brilliant! But What Would Jesus Do?[/quote]
Says the king of strawmen and logical fallacies.
[/quote]
Another spitball? ZEB you’re going to get detention ya lil runt.[/quote]
I’m trying to remember when I used the term “spitball” or was that a word you took from another poster? No wait…I forgot you don’t use other peoples words on purpose. You read them and then when you type you think of them again all by yourself. Yeah.
Once again I think that he would help you with your OCD, porno and alcohol addictions. He is God he can do all things why don’t you ask for help?
[/quote]
I just asked him, with open heart, to shut your little cunt mouth. And here you are, the energizer bunny of cowardice[/quote]
Hey you brought a new word into play that someone else has not yet used. Cowardice. Very good, now tell me how it applies to me. Make sure that when you explain that you use complete sentences and you actually make sense. Now do it right because if you fail I won’t go easy on you.
[/quote]
I told you in a prior thread that you were a coward. First, you’re an intellectual coward. Instead of supporting your position with argument, you resort to cheap attacks, all while sliding down that familiar slope of being a plain coward who comes to the internet to harass and insult another man. Teenagers talk shit on the internet. When men feel so strongly, they make it a point to say it in person or they STFU.
You ma’am, are a coward. There isn’t a pair of men’s underwear in your entire house unless of course your wife is wearing them.
Scripture doesn’t teach about the papacy (man made tradition does though). Anyways, I am not attacking Catholic beliefs and am not trying to start an argument (so forgive me please BC and Pat), but I do not believe in the Vicar of Christ, and therefore papal infallibility. Neither does ZEB.[/quote]
Yeah, that (among other things) separates Trib, you and I from the Catholics on the board. But with that said I have a great respect for Catholicism and the various stands that they’ve taken through the years to hold the line on traditional values.
[/quote]
Traditional values? LMFAO. Did you utter anything about values in light of the way you conduct yourself around here and other threads? You’re a typical fucking religious hypocrite. Thumping the bible with one hand, giving anyone else that doesn’t share your views the finger with the other. You’re not only a hypocrite, you’re a fucking coward. If you’re not, prove me wrong.
You did it again!! WOW…I just accused you of projecting and HERE IT IS thrown back at me. Do you ever ever have an original thought? LMAO…I have to share your idiocy with my wife she too will get a kick out of your shear ignorance. LOL…You are the gift that just keeps giving.
[/quote]
Maybe you didn’t notice ya lil mouth breather, but my post was FIRST.[/quote]
Wrong mine was first. And I only breath out of my mouth when I’m training and getting really, really tired. At least you didn’t repeat anyone else’s words this time. Of course who would be stupid enough to use such a phrase other than you?
You’ve done it! You are the best at what you do. Just about the top two things that you never do on a message board are, threaten to beat people up, as you earn the reputation of message board tough guy (not a good thing in case you can’t figure that out). And you’ve done this twice in the past two threads. And secondly make fun of someone’s mother or wife, as that causes you to look like someone who would rather pick on a woman than the person who is slapping you around the message board. You’ve now done them both and I bet, I just bet you have one or two more teen type comments up your sleeve. I will never bet against your stupidity or the level to which you will stoop to demonstrate that stupidity. So please carry on as I’ve said the night is still young.
Says the man who cannot understand the concept that an imperfect sinful man can pollute each and every doctrine shown him. Do you realize how many posts that it has taken me to get you to understand just this one little thing? Not agree with it, just UNDERSTAND IT. You are a very strange mix of hubris and ignorance. A very bad combination indeed.
[/quote]
So are you saying that scripture is polluted?[/quote]
Hahahahaha…LMAO you’re kidding me, come on (looks for a hidden camera). At this point a 5 year old would understand a simple sentence, that is man is inherently evil but not you. WOW-----WOW!
[/quote]
Can you address scripture or not? [/quote]
I really doubt that you would understand much if anything that I post. How many posts has it taken me to get you to understand that (my belief is) man is inherently evil?
They’re going to ignore the question, BG. We backed them into a corner. They admitted that MAN is evil and twisted the “words of God”. So when we ask them, “well if MAN is ‘inherently evil’ and twisted the words of God, then didn’t MAN write the scriptures and all that OTHER NONSENSE? What prevented MAN from writing whatever he felt like?” they will run away!
[quote]TheBodyGuard wrote:
If you were standing in front of me now, I’d slap you like the mouthy bitch that you are and send you on your way.[/quote]
YES! You did it.
You threatened to beat me up. Just like in that other thread you were on where you wanted to meet yet another person who thought you were a fraud. It went something like this (not verbatim):
“I live in Jersey, you live in Jersey? We can meet. I don’t pretend to know how to box but I’ve had my share of fights. You want to try me?”
LOL you are priceless man! You are the very definition of message board warrior. You are it. I don’t know how you sink any lower. I am just enjoying the heck right out of this whole confrontation.
Say more dumb stuff the night is till young.
[/quote]
Fucktard, you’d have to be a man to get beat up.[/quote]
Questioning manliness, one more Internet tough guy tactic. You never disappoint.
So you do believe in striking women. I see, glad we cleared that up. Add bully to your long list of shortcomings.
They call each other “fucktard” and “retard” and other assorted names which you have used here tonight? Does that mean that you are actually a woman? I mean who knows this is the Internet.
[quote]ZEB wrote:
You can’t even understand this…wow. It’s a simple courtesy that I’m paying to DD. He, like everyone else, should be made aware that you are a total fraud. [/quote]
You’re a chorus of one ZEB. And a broken record of strawmen and ad hominems. You’re brilliant! But What Would Jesus Do?[/quote]
Says the king of strawmen and logical fallacies.
[/quote]
Another spitball? ZEB you’re going to get detention ya lil runt.[/quote]
I’m trying to remember when I used the term “spitball” or was that a word you took from another poster? No wait…I forgot you don’t use other peoples words on purpose. You read them and then when you type you think of them again all by yourself. Yeah.
Once again I think that he would help you with your OCD, porno and alcohol addictions. He is God he can do all things why don’t you ask for help?
[/quote]
I just asked him, with open heart, to shut your little cunt mouth. And here you are, the energizer bunny of cowardice[/quote]
Hey you brought a new word into play that someone else has not yet used. Cowardice. Very good, now tell me how it applies to me. Make sure that when you explain that you use complete sentences and you actually make sense. Now do it right because if you fail I won’t go easy on you.
[/quote]
I told you in a prior thread that you were a coward. First, you’re an intellectual coward. Instead of supporting your position with argument, you resort to cheap attacks,[/quote]
Cheap attacks like calling people “fucktard” “retard” and the other assorted old worn out words and phrases that Internet tough guys like you live to use? You mean like that? Uh huh…
Honestly and this is not a put down, I had no idea that when I began to correct you for your many logical fallacies that you would turn into …well what you’ve turned into. Do I regret doing that? Noooooooooo… it’s been fun.
Right on cue I used the word “teenager” and here it is again thrown back at me. You’ve got a problem there pal.
LMAO… every now and then another gem comes to the surface. How does one say anything face to face over the Internet? Unless of course they meet up an fight over what was said over the Internet as you’ve now offered to do twice to do different people. You are a CLASSIC Internet tough guy. Are you going to go hit a woman when you’re done here?
[quote]angry chicken wrote:
They’re going to ignore the question, BG. We backed them into a corner. They admitted that MAN is evil and twisted the “words of God”. So when we ask them, “well if MAN is ‘inherently evil’ and twisted the words of God, then didn’t MAN write the scriptures and all that OTHER NONSENSE? What prevented MAN from writing whatever he felt like?” they will run away!
There is no other logical answer.
WE WON.[/quote]
I know. I like picking on him though. He’s one of those guys that can’t do this in real life, so he thinks he can come to the internet to annoy other men. He feels empowered behind his large screen display…typing feverishly, defending christianity while immersing himself deeper and deeper into the paradoxical hypocrisy so many of them suffer from.
Scripture doesn’t teach about the papacy (man made tradition does though). Anyways, I am not attacking Catholic beliefs and am not trying to start an argument (so forgive me please BC and Pat), but I do not believe in the Vicar of Christ, and therefore papal infallibility. Neither does ZEB.[/quote]
Yeah, that (among other things) separates Trib, you and I from the Catholics on the board. But with that said I have a great respect for Catholicism and the various stands that they’ve taken through the years to hold the line on traditional values.
[/quote]
Traditional values? LMFAO. Did you utter anything about values in light of the way you conduct yourself around here and other threads?[/quote]
Being for traditional values does not mean that I cannot correct someone for their many logical fallacies. Look I know it hurt your wittle feelings but a big bad Internet tough guy like you should be able to take it.
Define “thumping the Bible”. Are you able to do that or will you get all upset and threaten to strike a woman?
LOL…In many years on this site I have never met such an idiot as you. Honestly, you must be playing a part you cannot be real. HA HA…WOW.
[quote]TheBodyGuard wrote:
Man is inherently evil. Man is born into sin.
Who wrote scripture?
Who decided which scripture was included in the Bible?[/quote]
Man is inherently evil yes. But what that means is that we lean towards evil tendencies. not that we are born evil. But when we develop enough cognitive reasoning abilities (age of accountability), then we are judged. And man always leans towards evil.
Man, through the inspiration of God, wrote the scriptures. Over a period of 1600 years and roughly 40+ individuals chosen by God, God revealed to his prophets what he wanted written down. All the things that were written were validated by recorded miracles (events occurring outside natural laws) and fulfilled prophesies, things that could NOT have been done by human abilities alone.
After the scriptures were completed, they were circulated as individual books instead of a whole collection of books into one volume (the Bible). Though the scriptures were completed around 100 AD, it wasn’t formulated as a Bible until roughly 400 AD. During that time, there were many impostor “gospels” that were attempting to be recognized as scripture. That is when the early Church fathers, through inspiration by the Holy Spirit, were guided into all truth and knew which scriptures were of God, and which were not. We do not know exactly what their criteria was, or if they had any. My belief is that there was no criteria, just direct revelation from God. All the books in the Bible have some prophesy in them, and all these prophesies have been fulfilled, so that may have been something that they looked at, though again, I believe that God revealed which books were to be included directly.
If you need any more clarification just ask, and if I don’t have the answer I will find one for you from a reputable source
Join date: Oct 2002
Location: New Jersey, USA
Posts: 4115
ZEB wrote:
TheBodyGuard wrote:
But What Would Jesus Do?
Help you with your OCD and porn and alcohol addictions?
Projecting again ZEB?
At least two people here are having a discussion. And you’re here again, polluting a thread with your nonsensical attacks. Again, what man follows another man around the internet for this purpose? Ya lil jerk off. Now run along and argue with your fat wife ya unhappy bastard.
Report Post Edit | Quote
Today, 06:54 PM
You’re a pathetic little man. I feel sorry for you. And I’m not joking.
What you’ve done here is something that your Psychologist would call projecting. Ask him about it on your next visit. And no charge man.
Maybe THIS is why you bowed out of the discussion about physics. It appears you cannot even keep time. FYI my post at 6:32 precedes YOUR post at 6:54. See how that works silly man? Anyway, you haven’t let the truth or facts distract you thus far, so carry on my lil lady.
Wasn’t it the other thread you were denying you said what I actually quoted for you 3 different times? And quoted again for you in this thread? Yeah, that would be you Captain Delusional.
And here’s another hint for you ya lil guy, when someone uses your words back to you, they are MOCKING you, not EMULATING you.
Now pull your skirt back down. If you were here now I’d have you running around my house doing housework in hot pants and a tube top.
