Who Would Want to Look Like Lee Priest?

Training Bodybuilding
121

[quote]Blackaggar wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]Blackaggar wrote:
Ok ill post something on topic, has anyone read anything about the drug cycles this guy says he takes? they are extremely low and pretty much unbelieveable for when he cuts, what are some others opinions if theyve read what i had

id post a link but itd just get removed[/quote]

From what I’ve seen…and this is all opinion and speculation…but I wouldn’t put it past him to use way smaller doses during more of the year when he used to get heavier. I am sure everything but the kitchen sink was used to drop 70lbs in less than 4 months and still look great on stage.[/quote]

I would aggree with this because if he isnt using that much then the weight gain would come a great deal easier, but what didnt make sense to me is what he said he used to cut with was verrrry small compared to others especially considering he drops more weight then any other competitor

i found this article where asked he said

Like I said, I hate needles and hate taking the ****. I use 3 or 4 compounds ( primo, winstrol, clen and maybe some gh) all in small amounts during my precontest training because it helps me keep my size and helps me recovery

guy has good genetics so you never know i just thought this actually might be interesting to discuss.

also ive always been a fan of him because we both want to look like superheros except that he alrdy does, but i find him to be a very poor sport. I know theres some comps he should of one but hes a bit of a crybaby IMO[/quote]

Some guys just respond well to GH, add primo and winstrol which are already know for shedding fat like hell and maybe you could say it’s plausible. We can’t know for sure unless we know how Lee’s genetic work in regards to bodyfat. Maybe he is the kind of guy that can lose bodyfat just by walking down his neightboorhood, maybe he responds really well to those drugs. I don’t like to speculate about other people’s drug use and I always like to take people’s word for it. I don’t know why an outspoken guy like Lee would lie about this anyway.

He is also known to do a “couple hundred” reps on some exercises and take his damn time in the gym so… good cutting stack + mega volume training = destroying fat faster than a George Foreman grill.

122

[quote]Blackaggar wrote:

[quote]zraw wrote:

[quote]Blackaggar wrote:
Ok ill post something on topic, has anyone read anything about the drug cycles this guy says he takes? they are extremely low and pretty much unbelieveable for when he cuts, what are some others opinions if theyve read what i had

id post a link but itd just get removed[/quote]

IIRC Dorian Yates posted a cycle that looked pretty low. A lot of people called bullshit on this, while some others (Dante and other guys from IM) said it was very plausible

No way to know[/quote]

“cycles for pennies” ?

Im glad you brought this up because this reminded me of that article Dante put up talking about how low a lot of peoples doses relatively low, i forget the name but it was an interesting read[/quote]

123

[quote]DeltaOne wrote:

[quote]Blackaggar wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]Blackaggar wrote:
Ok ill post something on topic, has anyone read anything about the drug cycles this guy says he takes? they are extremely low and pretty much unbelieveable for when he cuts, what are some others opinions if theyve read what i had

id post a link but itd just get removed[/quote]

From what I’ve seen…and this is all opinion and speculation…but I wouldn’t put it past him to use way smaller doses during more of the year when he used to get heavier. I am sure everything but the kitchen sink was used to drop 70lbs in less than 4 months and still look great on stage.[/quote]

I would aggree with this because if he isnt using that much then the weight gain would come a great deal easier, but what didnt make sense to me is what he said he used to cut with was verrrry small compared to others especially considering he drops more weight then any other competitor

i found this article where asked he said

Like I said, I hate needles and hate taking the ****. I use 3 or 4 compounds ( primo, winstrol, clen and maybe some gh) all in small amounts during my precontest training because it helps me keep my size and helps me recovery

guy has good genetics so you never know i just thought this actually might be interesting to discuss.

also ive always been a fan of him because we both want to look like superheros except that he alrdy does, but i find him to be a very poor sport. I know theres some comps he should of one but hes a bit of a crybaby IMO[/quote]

Some guys just respond well to GH, add primo and winstrol which are already know for shedding fat like hell and maybe you could say it’s plausible. We can’t know for sure unless we know how Lee’s genetic work in regards to bodyfat. Maybe he is the kind of guy that can lose bodyfat just by walking down his neightboorhood, maybe he responds really well to those drugs. I don’t like to speculate about other people’s drug use and I always like to take people’s word for it. I don’t know why an outspoken guy like Lee would lie about this anyway.

He is also known to do a “couple hundred” reps on some exercises and take his damn time in the gym so… good cutting stack + mega volume training = destroying fat faster than a George Foreman grill.[/quote]

good post, i wanna watch more of his training vids

124

[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:

[quote]Demo man wrote:

[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:
If anyone here doesn’t want to look like him, you should probably quit posting in this section of the forums.[/quote]

DD…sorry to get off topic but I love your avatar![/quote]

Thanks, it’s a camera phone pic from the zoo. It’s a big silverback sitting with his back to the glass. The picture doesn’t do him justice. I could not get over how massive and muscular his back was. I think the little sign said he was 495 pounds.[/quote]

I know but look at his freakin’ waist!

125

Lee and Dorian have both been frank, outspoken dudes. Lee especially has no problem telling it like it is. I have no reason to doubt his claims, given the genetic freak that he is. Same with Yates.
No BS guys.

126


I really don’t understand why people find it hard to believe he got that heavy. That’s pretty much “average” body fat for most people with a ton of muscle underneath. You can even see the outline of his abs…which means he isn’t much heavier than many of us have been when carrying more body fat and bulking up. He just looks different because most aren’t used to seeing him that way.

Have him eat before the picture is taken and that’s what you get.

127

I mean…most here WISH they were carrying this much muscle.

That’s not photo shop. That’s just catching someone while relaxed and not with an empty stomach during off season.

128

[quote]Professor X wrote:
I really don’t understand why people find it hard to believe he got that heavy. That’s pretty much “average” body fat for most people with a ton of muscle underneath. You can even see the outline of his abs…which means he isn’t much heavier than many of us have been when carrying more body fat and bulking up. He just looks different because most aren’t used to seeing him that way.

Have him eat before the picture is taken and that’s what you get.[/quote]

Holly fucking shit!!! I can’t believe that’s actually Lee Priest.

Prof X, how long did it take Lee to lose all that fat?

129

I must be blind but i am sorry i see no abs and no i would not want to be carrying that much fat ever no matter how much muscle i had unless i had a specific purpose for it. IE powerlifting.

130

^^^Is this real life? not sure if srs.

Part of it is pec shape, but he literally has breasts (albeit, hairy breasts) in those pictures. Where are the abs? The only reason he looks halfway decent is because of how much muscle he has on his body. That’s honestly worse than the Trey Brewer shots when he was two years out of bodybuilding.

131

[quote]165StateChamp wrote:
^^^Is this real life? not sure if srs.

Part of it is pec shape, but he literally has breasts (albeit, hairy breasts) in those pictures. Where are the abs? The only reason he looks halfway decent is because of how much muscle he has on his body. That’s honestly worse than the Trey Brewer shots when he was two years out of bodybuilding. [/quote]

That is an extreme example. I have seen lots videos of Lee Priest during off season and after his competitive career and while he is smooth he is no where near that fat. With the exception of a few other guys like Trey Brewer nobody gets this out of shape. There is no benefit in getting that out of shape.

132

He’s relaxing his stomach and sticking it out. If he held it in and flexed you would see the outline of abs. It isn’t like he is 25% body fat right there.

133

[quote]Matthaeus wrote:
There is no benefit in getting that out of shape.

[/quote]
x2 I think it all comes down to what was mentioned earlier. Lee Priest liked to eat.

134

[quote]Freaky_Frankie wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:
I really don’t understand why people find it hard to believe he got that heavy. That’s pretty much “average” body fat for most people with a ton of muscle underneath. You can even see the outline of his abs…which means he isn’t much heavier than many of us have been when carrying more body fat and bulking up. He just looks different because most aren’t used to seeing him that way.

Have him eat before the picture is taken and that’s what you get.[/quote]

Holly fucking shit!!! I can’t believe that’s actually Lee Priest.

Prof X, how long did it take Lee to lose all that fat?[/quote]

Apparently about 4 months.

135

Just because I think this is interesting…this is how you play with pictures. First, he isn’t THAT fat. CT had an article once where he showed a “before” and “after” pic taken minutes apart of himself and the difference was drastic.

Have Lee Priest Eat two Whoppers before the shoot and completely relax and that is what you get.

I had eaten right before my “before” pic also. I mean, it isn’t like the human stomach doesn’t expand.

Considering he would go from that to ripped in about 3-4months usually means he couldn’t have been that far gone.

136

[quote]spar4tee wrote:

[quote]Matthaeus wrote:
There is no benefit in getting that out of shape.

[/quote]
x2 I think it all comes down to what was mentioned earlier. Lee Priest liked to eat.[/quote]

Not just that…but during that time, we are talking about a guy who stood out so much that the only reason he didn’t do way better is because of his height.

Obviously his way was working…so why change what works?

137

[quote]Matthaeus wrote:

[quote]165StateChamp wrote:
^^^Is this real life? not sure if srs.

Part of it is pec shape, but he literally has breasts (albeit, hairy breasts) in those pictures. Where are the abs? The only reason he looks halfway decent is because of how much muscle he has on his body. That’s honestly worse than the Trey Brewer shots when he was two years out of bodybuilding. [/quote]

That is an extreme example. I have seen lots videos of Lee Priest during off season and after his competitive career and while he is smooth he is no where near that fat. With the exception of a few other guys like Trey Brewer nobody gets this out of shape. There is no benefit in getting that out of shape.

[/quote]

Oh I know. Nobody who’s successful in this sport gets that fat on a regular basis. I have no idea what the point was in even posting that picture. And trumpeting the fact that it only took 3-4 months for him to cut is stupid. Give anybody boatloads of cutting drugs and force them to undereat and they will be able to do the same. All that really shows is, as usual, Priest is a bullshitter about his drug use.

138

Uh, I posted it because the entire thread was about how heavy he got and whether we would want to look like that???

LOL at “why it was posted”.

139

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]Freaky_Frankie wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:
I really don’t understand why people find it hard to believe he got that heavy. That’s pretty much “average” body fat for most people with a ton of muscle underneath. You can even see the outline of his abs…which means he isn’t much heavier than many of us have been when carrying more body fat and bulking up. He just looks different because most aren’t used to seeing him that way.

Have him eat before the picture is taken and that’s what you get.[/quote]

Holly fucking shit!!! I can’t believe that’s actually Lee Priest.

Prof X, how long did it take Lee to lose all that fat?[/quote]

Apparently about 4 months.[/quote]

Wow, that’s sick. Personally, since every pound I’m downing is costing me a lot of sweat, blood and chalk, I would do everything in my power not to blow up again. But then again, he’s a pro and had a method behind the apparent madness.

140

[quote]Freaky_Frankie wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]Freaky_Frankie wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:
I really don’t understand why people find it hard to believe he got that heavy. That’s pretty much “average” body fat for most people with a ton of muscle underneath. You can even see the outline of his abs…which means he isn’t much heavier than many of us have been when carrying more body fat and bulking up. He just looks different because most aren’t used to seeing him that way.

Have him eat before the picture is taken and that’s what you get.[/quote]

Holly fucking shit!!! I can’t believe that’s actually Lee Priest.

Prof X, how long did it take Lee to lose all that fat?[/quote]

Apparently about 4 months.[/quote]

Wow, that’s sick. Personally, since every pound I’m downing is costing me a lot of sweat, blood and chalk, I would do everything in my power not to blow up again. But then again, he’s a pro and had a method behind the apparent madness.[/quote]

It’s all about how easy it is to lose it. I don’t plan to gain as much fat as I had on me ever again…but I also know it didn’t take insane measures for me to get my waist down.

I am sure thyroid hormone, gh and genetics are one way he did it so effortlessly.