Looks like a mean motherfucker though. lol
Looks like a Neanderthal.
the title of this should have been “who would you rather blow lesner or coleman?”
[quote]Quick Ben wrote:
Similar to Arnold[/quote]
Lmao similar to arnold, how much crack did you smoke today
[quote]eatliftsleep wrote:
[quote]Quick Ben wrote:
Similar to Arnold[/quote]
Lmao similar to arnold, how much crack did you smoke today
[/quote]
[quote]decimation wrote:
Sebastien Chabal is a big fairly lean French rugby player. I think he has medium heavy build a bit like Ayrnold .[/quote]
That’s what I was thinking. lol
Anyway, this thread was retarded and all, but hardly up to 2009 standards.
4/10, would not read again.
Mostly his natural frame /skeletal structure is similar to Arnold’s(clealry Arnold carried more muscle). On the close up he looks bigger, His back is probably his best feature bodybuilding wise, Of course there Bathieu Basterau , an 18 stone 250lb centreat around 5 foot 10. He is not that lean though.
[quote]Quick Ben wrote:
[quote]eatliftsleep wrote:
[quote]Quick Ben wrote:
Similar to Arnold[/quote]
Lmao similar to arnold, how much crack did you smoke today
[/quote]
[quote]decimation wrote:
Sebastien Chabal is a big fairly lean French rugby player. I think he has medium heavy build a bit like Ayrnold .[/quote]
That’s what I was thinking. lol
Anyway, this thread was retarded and all, but hardly up to 2009 standards.
4/10, would not read again.[/quote]
you joined in 2010
[quote]Quick Ben wrote:
Similar to Arnold[/quote]
Probably has something to do with the angle
They are both around 235lb. Clearly Arnold is a bit leaner but they are similarly built skeletally.
Mathieu Bastareaud is 120kg at 6ft 271lb. He is a lot bigger than Arnold. He is built like Coleman probably before Coleman did a lot of bodybuilding.
They are also drug tested athletes. They are not using the pump , I guess they did use creatine (so they may have water retention.
[quote]decimation wrote:
They are both around 235lb. Clearly Arnold is a bit leaner but they are similarly built skeletally.
Mathieu Bastareaud is 120kg at 6ft 271lb. He is a lot bigger than Arnold. He is built like Coleman probably before Coleman did a lot of bodybuilding.
They are also drug tested athletes. They are not using the pump , I guess they did use creatine (so they may have water retention.[/quote]
I don’t even…
Who the fuck cares if their skeletal structure is similar if you take away the MASSIVE amounts of muscular weight difference? Like, even in the context of this retarded thread that still doesn’t make sense. I’m sure you just wanted to back up that one guy who said something retarded about rugby players so you’re throwing names out, but what you’re actually typing is just dumb.
[quote]decimation wrote:
Mostly his natural frame /skeletal structure is similar to Arnold’s(clealry Arnold carried more muscle). On the close up he looks bigger, His back is probably his best feature bodybuilding wise, Of course there Bathieu Basterau , an 18 stone 250lb centreat around 5 foot 10. He is not that lean though.
[/quote]
Dude… Your boyfriend rugby player looks like shit compared to bodybuilding standards. Who gives a fuck about bone structure if you dont have the mass on it. This thread is so dumb its entertaining.
what the fuck is going on here? in what universe could that guy be compared to Arnie?
This is getting surreal now
Oddly enough, Chabal is reported to be 250 pounds at 6’4" but that from that one pic I wouldn’t peg him any heavier than 210-220 (tops). Gargantuan head maybe?
Im surprised by our rugby loving friend’s choices - I’d say Henry Tuilagi - over 280 pounds at 20ish% at 5’11 is the beefiest rugby player around, and even he’d be dwarfed in every sense by a 260 pound 6’2" offseason Arnold lol.
Mathieu Bastareaud
According to above poster this guy is bigger than Arnold and closer to Ronnie?
Where am I???
I think the creatine is just making him look more bloated.
It makes more sense to see that Arnold’s measurements are from the off-season.
His measurements don’t make sense on some at 235lb.
Bastareud looks a bit leaner on occasion .
This is me standing next to the owner of my gym. I’m a legit 6 3 1/2 without shoes on. The next pic is the gym owner standing next to Ronnie Coleman. No way he is 5’ 11".
Is this dumpster fire still burning?
Most skinny and/or short kids began lifting to get “bigger” and “stronger” and to possibly defend themselves against the lunch money bullies, and maybe beat a few characters in arm wrestling to impress girls. Another section gets involved to lose weight and get lean and “six pack city” boooyahhh.
Over time both sections gravitate towards bodybuilding since it appears to be the ideal tool for them to get “bigger and stronger” and “leaner” for the fat fucks who were chubby in high school.
But once they spend enough time in the bodybuilding forum the gurus convince them that being strong, athletic, powerful, and being able to defend yourself has nothing to do with bodybuilding.
Also, “natural” bodybuilding isn’t even about looking “bigger” in real life except to serious BBers and/or on stage posing in a banana hammock ???
The one comforting thought for most who got in this activity to get bigger and stronger has been that their idols (the pros) could dwarf anyone and everyone else.
Ergo, the fire burns on!
[quote]BlueCollarTr8n wrote:
Is this dumpster fire still burning? [/quote]