[quote]WN76 wrote:
[quote]batman730 wrote:
[quote]WN76 wrote:
[quote]batman730 wrote:
[quote]Robert A wrote:
Another poster has already mentioned reporting the incident as a house being “broken” into instead of merely something suspicious in order to speed response.
In that vein, and in the interest of comedy:
[quote]WN76 wrote:
[quote]LondonBoxer123 wrote:
[quote]WN76 wrote:
[quote]batman730 wrote:
I expect I’d call the cops, explain the situation and stay on the line with the call taker and keep them informed and follow their direction (if practical) while I found something inconspicuous to occupy myself with until the police arrived. If I could maintain visual contact without being seen myself I would do so. If there is a reasonable/innocent explanation for the situation, the police can sort that out when they arrive. We pay people with guns to come out and deal with this sort of thing. Response time where I live is around 4 minutes. I can hang tight for that long.[/quote]
This is exactly what I would do. [/quote]
Police don’t generally hurry into the area I grew up in. It’s not some kind of Mexican cartel town or anything, but it’s an area where violent crime is taken as a given, and police response time, if they do respond, would be lengthy.
If we assume they aren’t passing through, and I haven’t done anything to upset any of the known trouble makers, I’d probably still call the fuzz, lie low and wait it out, then end up staying with a mate when the Met decided they weren’t interested in responding to my complaint. [/quote]
Yea, where you live will definitely influence your action. Where I live, this would be way out of the norm. It’s also out of the norm in the residential areas I patrol, and we would go check it out in a reasonable amount of time if we weren’t busy with something more pressing.
[/quote]
This is why when you really need the police you don’t do any of this observe and report shit.
You give your location, then say the following “Help, my donut truck is being attacked by naked strippers.” The only issue is sometimes the SWAT/Tactical Team can’t get their van past all the firetrucks that also show up.
For batman730, WN76, and others
I am told, but have no first hand knowledge obviously, that the LEO version of this would be Location followed by an excited “Help, She’s 22. She’s naked. And She is fighting me!” The phrase multi-agency response doesn’t begin to cover it. Screw that officer needs assistance shit.
Regards,
Robert A [/quote]
Well, the tactical guys might have trouble getting past the firefighters cause it takes them a little longer to get suited, booted and strapped. However, the patrol guys will have no trouble beating the hose heads to the scene because they will be, ya know, awake, dressed and out driving around looking for work when the call comes in (as opposed to having a BBQ and a sleepover like the fireys).
I also believe, in my area at least, you would probably get a more enthusiastic response to your specialty taco truck than your donut truck. LE is evolving with the times, after all. Of course, as WN76 says, you best actually have a taco truck being attacked by strippers or you may catch a charge.
Regarding the naked, assaultive 20 something female, sadly I have it on pretty good authority that it’s less glamorous than many might hope. People who fight the police while naked are rarely people anybody wanted to see naked in the first place. “No nudity is good nudity” seems to be the order of the day, which is pretty much the diametrically opposed to how one generally approaches nudity in one’s personal life, but there you go.[/quote]
Had a good chuckle with this one. In my area, you better hope your house isn’t burning down during the NHL playoffs. I’m pretty sure it’s the same in your neck of the woods.
As for the ATSF, it’s never glamorous. The only upside to it is that you know she isn’t concealing a weapon… However… [/quote]
You would like to think you could be sure she wasn’t carrying.
Apparently not.
http://www.torontosun.com/...d+gun+in+vagina [/quote]
The weapon.
[/quote]
No joke. From another story.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/…–unloaded.html
If you have a problem with the link, it appears this guy had 10+" of .38 revolver up his rectum when he went into lockup. There’s a picture (of the revolver, not the rectum).
Unsettling…