[quote]rainjack wrote:
harris447 wrote:
And, your definition of an open mind is not correct. With very post, you prove yourself dumber.
But, keep going. Love your work!
Your assault on his intelligence would hold a lot more water if you could fucking spell. As it is - you are the one proving their idiocy with EVERY post.
[/quote]
First of all, numbnuts: nothing is spelled wrong in my last post.
Second: correcting spelling/grammar is the best way to let everyone know you have nothing at all to say.
Third: if we’re correcting each other’s language, “their” is incorrect. You need a singular pronoun there. The proper word would be “his”.
[quote]harris447 wrote:
rainjack wrote:
harris447 wrote:
And, your definition of an open mind is not correct. With very post, you prove yourself dumber.
But, keep going. Love your work!
Your assault on his intelligence would hold a lot more water if you could fucking spell. As it is - you are the one proving their idiocy with EVERY post.
First of all, numbnuts: nothing is spelled wrong in my last post.
Second: correcting spelling/grammar is the best way to let everyone know you have nothing at all to say.
Third: if we’re correcting each other’s language, “their” is incorrect. You need a singular pronoun there. The proper word would be “his”.
But, thanks for playing.
[/quote]
Let me help point out what he is complaining about.
you wrote
“And, your definition of an open mind is not correct. With [very] post, you prove yourself dumber.”
[quote]vroom wrote:
Yeah, let’s focus on minor spelling or grammar issues and avoid the thoughts being expressed.
Hello? McFly?[/quote]
Hey I was just pointing it out so he could retract part of it. I don’t care personally since most of my post are full or those errors since I don’t proof read.
If you would like I can stick my fingers in my ears and just say lalalalalalalala
[quote]vroom wrote:
Yeah, let’s focus on minor spelling or grammar issues and avoid the thoughts being expressed.
Hello? McFly?[/quote]
What issues? Wind farms? Solar power? Oh - wait you must be talking about Kyoto.
The guy is an idiot. He has no position on here other than to call people names. Responding to him is like negotiating with terrorists. Nothing is gained, and you wind up wasting your time.
I thought that since he was perfect - his spelling should be as well. The sad part is that he is convinced that nothing was wrong with his post. Some people just won’t be helped - especially the perfect ones.
Galileo built a telescope, saw that some celestial bodies don’t go around the earth, and was called to account by the cardinals at the Vatican. His theory conflicted with their interpretation of the Bible. He then begged them to look through the scope and they refused. They had closed their minds.
My posts are asking you guys to ‘look through that scope’. Is AIDS a crock? Is global warming some leftist mish-mash? Some of the reactions would be suitable to those cardinals. One guy talks about how my posts are dumber and dumber – have you ever been to high school? I don’t think you’d be allowed near one. Another guy gives me the leftist interpretation of an open mind – as if good and bad are open to debate.
My reaction: What pure Horse-Fucking Shit!
[quote]haney wrote:
ron33 wrote:
Haney,I forgot to add,do you not work for a living? you seem to think every working man is lazy.The men i speak of are hard core old-timers,they know when somebody is a fake and fraud they are not the type that believe the propaganda of political parties,they are men that will work you into the ground and put knots on your noggin if need be.They have been in to many different life situations,and know how to sift thru the shit of corporate america etc.
I own my own business. so yeah, I work for a living. Most employees I have don’t live up to their full potential.[/quote]
Haney,I understand what your saying about most employees,I have seen very few that i would hire to work for me.Not just union workers ,but in every business i have worked around,i find most people are’nt really qualified and it usually ends up either a relative or friend or drinking or doping buddy got them there job.It just goes to show there is not much integrity anymore.I even know one guy that was a junkie couldnt make it to work more than 2-3 days a week and his parish priest got him a job as a bailiff at our county courthouse.What a crock that was.I know a few successful business men.that have made it on their own and i applaude them but the majority of the business people i know inherited their business by hook or by crook and they have no idea themselves what it is reallylike to work hard.Most of them are party boys and a few have ruined companies that were 3-4 generations old.And they wanted to live high on the hog but didnt want to pay decent wages.Good luck with your company!!! I have a jaded view from dealing with these kind of people.
Haney,I know its off topic,but just wanted to apologize for the information void remark,I just thought about years ago when i worked for some fellas down your way,from OFIXCO,They were 2 of the nicest guys i ever worked for,treated their workers with respect the first time they called me sir ,i looked behind me to see if there was someone else in the area they were talking to.I told them thats the first time anyone called me sir on the job,and they said yes we noticed people arent very friendly or nice around here.They made me an offer to travel with them but i had small child and my wife didnt want to travel and live out of a motor home.Lookin back ,we should have done it.
[quote]rainjack wrote:
harris447 wrote:
And, your definition of an open mind is not correct. With very post, you prove yourself dumber.
But, keep going. Love your work!
Your assault on his intelligence would hold a lot more water if you could fucking spell. As it is - you are the one proving their idiocy with EVERY post.
[quote]ron33 wrote:
haney wrote:
ron33 wrote:
Haney,I forgot to add,do you not work for a living? you seem to think every working man is lazy.The men i speak of are hard core old-timers,they know when somebody is a fake and fraud they are not the type that believe the propaganda of political parties,they are men that will work you into the ground and put knots on your noggin if need be.They have been in to many different life situations,and know how to sift thru the shit of corporate america etc.
I own my own business. so yeah, I work for a living. Most employees I have don’t live up to their full potential.
Haney,I understand what your saying about most employees,I have seen very few that i would hire to work for me.Not just union workers ,but in every business i have worked around,i find most people are’nt really qualified and it usually ends up either a relative or friend or drinking or doping buddy got them there job.It just goes to show there is not much integrity anymore.I even know one guy that was a junkie couldnt make it to work more than 2-3 days a week and his parish priest got him a job as a bailiff at our county courthouse.What a crock that was.I know a few successful business men.that have made it on their own and i applaude them but the majority of the business people i know inherited their business by hook or by crook and they have no idea themselves what it is reallylike to work hard.Most of them are party boys and a few have ruined companies that were 3-4 generations old.And they wanted to live high on the hog but didnt want to pay decent wages.Good luck with your company!!! I have a jaded view from dealing with these kind of people.[/quote]
ron you seem like a nice guy, and I sympathize with your pov on companies. I felt the same way until I started my own. I agree the guys at the top can sometimes lose site of what it is to be a leader of people, and not a ruler.
I appreciate your best wishes, and I wish you the best of luck with your endeavours.
[quote]ron33 wrote:
Haney,I know its off topic,but just wanted to apologize for the information void remark,I just thought about years ago when i worked for some fellas down your way,from OFIXCO,They were 2 of the nicest guys i ever worked for,treated their workers with respect the first time they called me sir ,i looked behind me to see if there was someone else in the area they were talking to.I told them thats the first time anyone called me sir on the job,and they said yes we noticed people arent very friendly or nice around here.They made me an offer to travel with them but i had small child and my wife didnt want to travel and live out of a motor home.Lookin back ,we should have done it.[/quote]
Not all Texans still practice that sense of respect for people. I am fortunate since I know a few who still do.
Well, I’m amazed, I never knew there were political interpretations for things like the phrase “open mind”.
You can’t just pick your own meaning and declare everyone else in the world wrong…
If you want to discuss something, you might try using the English language for a change, it might work better.
Some things don’t have to be political and neither do they automatically become political because of who says them. I can’t believe the ignorance I see around here at times.
By the way, with respect to AIDS, I worked for Abbott Laboratories at one point. You know, the company that among other things sells reagants for blood testing (for all kinds of things).
AIDS could possibly be misnamed, but if it didn’t exist I’d be incredibly surprised, given the huge number of incredibly bright and earnest people conducting honest research in an attempt to save lives.
Out of curiousity I talked with our local science honcho a few times and read some of the suggested literature. I don’t remember jack shit, but I do remember discussing potential avenues of future research based on findings current at the time.
So, if you want to convince people that AIDS does not exist and not be laughed at, perhaps you could offer something akin to real evidence? No, I don’t have the time or inclination to buy every book on the planet, howabout some excerpts to attempt at providing your viewpoint some credibility?
Then again, if you make up your own definitions, you can probably come to any conclusions you want…
[quote]harris447 wrote:
Gosh, all the right-wingers think I’m dumb.
You guys do know dumb…seeing as how you elected Bush an all. You must be right.[/quote]
It’s not that I think you’re dumb. I just don’t think you are as intelligent as you think you are. But I am affraid that, in a match of wit, Bush would own you. And I’m really don’t think that the guy splits atoms on his day off, either.
[quote]rainjack wrote:
harris447 wrote:
Gosh, all the right-wingers think I’m dumb.
You guys do know dumb…seeing as how you elected Bush an all. You must be right.
It’s not that I think you’re dumb. I just don’t think you are as intelligent as you think you are. But I am affraid that, in a match of wit, Bush would own you. And I’m really don’t think that the guy splits atoms on his day off, either. [/quote]
Which Bush? The one who thought people who lived in greece were called Grecians? The one who doesn’t like to read the papers?
RainJack,Why do you think GW is so wonderful? I have read a lot of the posts and i think GW would have a hard time debating? any of you guys.He just doesnt seem to be that quick witted.He reminds me of the guys i see all the time,that their secratery is actually the brains in the outfit but they get all the credit.
[quote]ron33 wrote:
RainJack,Why do you think GW is so wonderful? I have read a lot of the posts and i think GW would have a hard time debating? any of you guys.He just doesnt seem to be that quick witted.He reminds me of the guys i see all the time,that their secratery is actually the brains in the outfit but they get all the credit.[/quote]
I don’t think I’ve ever referred to him as “wonderful”. But compared to Algore, or Kerry - he is certaily closer to wonderful than those two.
I think he is a good delegator. He lets the experts do their job, and doesn’t have an ego that forces him into micro-management. I think that the whole Katrina goat screw showed that perhaps he can be a little too hands off at times, but still, a better trait to have than an egomaniac that thinks he knows everything.