[quote]steveo5801 wrote:
Thanks to Vroom and his companions, I am starting this thread to gather your ideas to this one question. This question was asked by the Roman governor Pontius Pilate to Jesus Christ just before He was sent to the cross. It really is the question of the ages.
The question simply is: “What Is Truth?”
What is absolute truth? Is there any such thing as absolute truth? Where does truth come from? Who determines what is true? Is all truth just relative – what is true for you, is good for you, but not necessarily truth for me, etc?
To begin, as many of you probably know, I am a Bible-believing, born-again Christian. My faith is in the God of the Bible and His Word. God is the source of absolute truth and He has placed within us the ability to know moral truth through our consciences.
Is it any wonder that the English legal system (which is also the basis for our legal system) is based upon God’s moral law as given in the Hebrew Scriptures (The Old Testament)? Why would that be?
I want to emphazise that ALL opinions are welcome here. Unlike Vroom’s thread on his “four principles,” where they absolutely do not want to hear from people of faith – well at least not from Christians – I welcome all opinions for discussion.
I think we can learn much from each other, and I will admit my faith in God is strong, but I would appreciate your thoughts on this important question of What is truth?
[/quote]
Absolute truth is that which is observable to a given person at a given time. There is no way of conveying it from one person to another. All “truth”, as it is commonly known, is completely subjective.
What is described as “faith in God” is actually nothing more than faith in an idea generated by other people. This argument is easy to support: every single religious person has acquired his faith – not from any direct contact with God – but merely from others who instilled the belief within him. Religion has been called a “memetic virus”, and I would agree with this classification. Simply put, this means that it’s existence is entirely dependant on it’s conveyance from one generation to the next as a mental concept. Unlike science, there is no external source through which it could be observed. Once gone, it would stay gone (at least in a particular form).
While science builds upon the observable knowledge of the world, and is thus ever-expanding in its scope, faith is in a constant struggle for its own existence. Each new generation of humans is born without any prior knowledge of religious doctrines, and thus, MUST be indoctrinated according to said doctrines if the faith is to survive.
Scientific progress can stall for hundreds, thousands of years, as it has in the past, without dying or significantly regressing. If all the major religions in the world were simply “forgotten” about for merely 100 years (or if, for example, everyone who knew religion perished), the concept of religion would cease to exist on earth. Because that’s all that faith is: a concept. And all concepts are dependant on human minds for their existence.