[quote]zephead4747 wrote:
Vicomte wrote:
zephead4747 wrote:
Vicomte wrote:
zephead4747 wrote:
Vicomte wrote:
Average drunk home-invading Jane carries the same risk for harm to you as plane-riding Muslim Joe, that is, next to none. Do you really feel that threatened by girls so drunk their screams are slurred? I don’t.
Are you seriously trying to compare the violence rates of muslims as a whole versus home invaders as a whole? You better get soem data to back that, becuase it is illogical at best.
You lose.
It’s an analogy, used to illustrate a point, not a statistical comparison. Are you really this moronic? We’re talking about a fucking drunk girl. Not an armed thug.
I think I really am done now, as this is going nowhere. Feel free to murder the next drunken bitch that stumbles belligerently into your abode. Tell me how that feels, you Machiavellian hard-ass you! God Speed!
Oh why don’t you go paint your fingernails.
Seriously? Grow up. That’s twice in one thread. If you guys can’t refute my argument based on the principles of the debate, and feel the need to attempt to insult me by the fact that I color my fucking fingernails, that’s just pathetic. Not only does it fail, but it makes you look like a petty imbecile.
I think I might redo them tonight, actually. They’re a bit chipped…then again, I kinda like 'em like that. They look more interesting.
Seriously? you took a stab at me, and I made a joke in your direction. You must be pretty insecure about it if you can’t take a ribbing.
Relax buddy, I don’t think less of you for it. I made several good points, and you made some shitty comparison and used it as evidence.[/quote]
You ignored the rest of my argument–about two pages of it, and focused on a hyperbolic analogy. I provided counterpoints as needed.
Perhaps your comment wasn’t as mean-spirited as it seemed, if that’s the case, my apologies. I was referring to you in context of the argument, it appeared that you were making irrelevant ad hominem statements. If not, then we’re cool.