Fair comment i know. Chomsky is a radical. But any of you try to disprove him… You’ll look as stupid as if you tried squatting a ton
And it’s not like i sat and listened only to my teacher for months on end… there were various books and journal articles… At least 40 authors
[quote]dannyrat wrote:
Fair comment i know. Chomsky is a radical. But any of you try to disprove him… You’ll look as stupid as if you tried squatting a ton
And it’s not like i sat and listened only to my teacher for months on end… there were various books and journal articles… At least 40 authors[/quote]
Do you realize how ridiculous this makes you sound?
[quote]Marmadogg wrote:
History shows that chickenhawks make worse mistakes when running a country than ex-military.
I know you don’t need any examples.
Israel’s current PM has no military experience and we have seen how that has turned out.
Your ideas are interesting but history has show that chickenhawks really F things up.
Look what happened in Vietnam with chickenhawk Dems running the show.
The chickenhawk Republicans have committed the same idiotic mistakes.[/quote]
Hey marm!!!
Thanks for chiming in.
Just curious if you would consider James Madison, James Polk, Abraham Lincoln, Woodrow Wilson, FDR “chickenhawks.”
If memory serves, each prosecuted a successful war.
GWB saw as much active combat as any of them.
I know, stop with the logic.
Go with the soundbite.
Did you get that “chickenhawk” comment straight from bill maher? Or was it moveon.org?
You’re so clever!!!
JeffR
Where’s Beirut again???..
Doesn’t exist anymore. Still, she looks like she has a great body. maybe we could repopulate lebanon together after the war
[quote]JeffR wrote:
Marmadogg wrote:
History shows that chickenhawks make worse mistakes when running a country than ex-military.
I know you don’t need any examples.
Israel’s current PM has no military experience and we have seen how that has turned out.
Your ideas are interesting but history has show that chickenhawks really F things up.
Look what happened in Vietnam with chickenhawk Dems running the show.
The chickenhawk Republicans have committed the same idiotic mistakes.
Hey marm!!!
Thanks for chiming in.
Just curious if you would consider James Madison, James Polk, Abraham Lincoln, Woodrow Wilson, FDR “chickenhawks.”
If memory serves, each prosecuted a successful war.
GWB saw as much active combat as any of them.
I know, stop with the logic.
Go with the soundbite.
Did you get that “chickenhawk” comment straight from bill maher? Or was it moveon.org?
You’re so clever!!!
JeffR[/quote]
Vietnam and Iraq do not resemble the wars James Madison, James Polk, Abraham Lincoln, and Woodrow Wilson participated.
To suggest there is a similarity is illogical…then again that is your MO.
Your attempt is a joke as usual.
JeffR’s rebuttal and assertions follow the same idiotic paths.
You are either with Dubya or agains Dubya.
If you are against Dubya then you are a member of MoveOn.org and have Michael Moore on speed dial.
Coming from a weak stick like JeffR that does not even weight 2 bills does not supprise me.
marma-prick stated:
“Your ideas are interesting but history has show that chickenhawks really F things up.”
I gave you plenty of examples of people who prosecuted successful wars without having been in combat. If I understand the current liberal talking point, they nicely fit the “chickenhawk” definiton.
Your arguments are so shallow that it’s hard to determine what you are trying to say.
I waded through the usual nonsense about me and I think your retort is trying to insinuate that Vietnam=Iraq.
Am I right in your current shifting stance?
Use your words, marm.
JeffR