[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]Schwarzfahrer wrote:
What a strange thread.
Aren’t we on a bodybuilding website?
You know, this most frivolous, narcissistic hobby where men pose online and brag with stats and numbers?
[/quote]
Yeah…that’s the point…you have to have the body to flaunt it.
[/quote]
Or you could be happy/confident with who you are and how you look regardless.
My only issue is her lack of ass.
[quote]audiogarden1 wrote:
[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]Schwarzfahrer wrote:
What a strange thread.
Aren’t we on a bodybuilding website?
You know, this most frivolous, narcissistic hobby where men pose online and brag with stats and numbers?
[/quote]
Yeah…that’s the point…you have to have the body to flaunt it.
[/quote]
Or you could be happy/confident with who you are and how you look regardless. [/quote]
Uh…no.
We have discovered that all women should not be allowed to wear all clothes. 300lbs of muffin top do not fit into a extra small low cut Daisy Duke jean set.
[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]audiogarden1 wrote:
[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]Schwarzfahrer wrote:
What a strange thread.
Aren’t we on a bodybuilding website?
You know, this most frivolous, narcissistic hobby where men pose online and brag with stats and numbers?
[/quote]
Yeah…that’s the point…you have to have the body to flaunt it.
[/quote]
Or you could be happy/confident with who you are and how you look regardless. [/quote]
Uh…no.
We have discovered that all women should not be allowed to wear all clothes. 300lbs of muffin top do not fit into a extra small low cut Daisy Duke jean set.[/quote]
Ah, you’re right. Only the biggest booty hos and the most jacked dudes should be allowed to be happy/confident with how they look.
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]jbpick86 wrote:
I absolutely cannot understand the outrage from parents on this because the children saw it. [/quote]
[quote]jbpick86 wrote:
As a side note, did anyone feel like they were in like a pedophile’s fantasy world when they watched that, with all the random teddy bears and crap. [/quote]
I’m confused…[/quote]
I’m thinking that one can be OK with the fact that this dance was aired on TV while still thinkng it was silly.
Because that’s what I felt.
Miley is being paid by the government to distract us from Snowden.
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]kaisermetal wrote:
She has money, fame and success.
Nothing justifies all that outrage,
[/quote]
What if the people outraged have money, fame and success?
Does that justify it? Because your post implies that money, fame and success justify an individuals choices…
[/quote]
nope, that’s not what i meant. She can have and do anything she wants as long she is not harming anyone.
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]Airtruth wrote:
I searched through the thread but Beans did you ever explain what was wrong with what Miley did?
.[/quote]
I have.
People just keep missing it. Either because they don’t want to discuss it, or it is more fun to pretend I’m saying things I’m not. [/quote]
All I see is you saying different ways that you really didn’t mind what she did, but because you have a daughter you didn’t like it.
I’m asking specifically where should she have stopped? Do you think the outfit was bad? (I’m with X had she filled it out I would’ve loved it). People have warn less to the Grammy’s red carpet.
Should she have danced all the way up to the point she touched Thicke? Don’t get me wrong she looked bad, but to me mainly because of her outfit.
I have heard about shows where I thought somebody did something wrong. I didn’t see it myself as I don’t watch tv much, but I heard Nikki Minaj gave a full out lap dance and twinkled her fingers like she was playing w/herself. That I don’t think should be on an awards show.
[quote]Makavali wrote:
Miley is being paid by the government to distract us from Snowden.[/quote]
Pretty sure the NSA is at your front door…
[quote]four60 wrote:
My only issue is her lack of ass.[/quote]
She has an ass.
A flabby, skinny fat one, not befitting someone who should have some training in dancing.
C) There is nothing wrong with what happened she is a solo pop artist trying to distance her self from Hanna Montana… She also has a album comming out next week so seems like a good PR stunt… That or she popped some good Mollys b4 the show…
My only critique is if she wants to twerk she needs a bit more ass & titties
[quote]kaisermetal wrote:
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]kaisermetal wrote:
She has money, fame and success.
Nothing justifies all that outrage,
[/quote]
What if the people outraged have money, fame and success?
Does that justify it? Because your post implies that money, fame and success justify an individuals choices…
[/quote]
nope, that’s not what i meant. She can have and do anything she wants as long she is not harming anyone.
[/quote]
Does this include take a critical look at the actions of others, and speak about it?
Can she do that?
[quote]Airtruth wrote:
All I see is you saying different ways that you really didn’t mind what she did, but because you have a daughter you didn’t like it.[/quote]
On the right path, but still not there.
In the macro sense, what is the difference between the two really?
[quote]Nards wrote:
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]jbpick86 wrote:
I absolutely cannot understand the outrage from parents on this because the children saw it. [/quote]
[quote]jbpick86 wrote:
As a side note, did anyone feel like they were in like a pedophile’s fantasy world when they watched that, with all the random teddy bears and crap. [/quote]
I’m confused…[/quote]
I’m thinking that one can be OK with the fact that this dance was aired on TV while still thinkng it was silly.
Because that’s what I felt.[/quote]
Significant difference between “silly” and “pedophile’s fantasy” no?
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]Nards wrote:
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]jbpick86 wrote:
I absolutely cannot understand the outrage from parents on this because the children saw it. [/quote]
[quote]jbpick86 wrote:
As a side note, did anyone feel like they were in like a pedophile’s fantasy world when they watched that, with all the random teddy bears and crap. [/quote]
I’m confused…[/quote]
I’m thinking that one can be OK with the fact that this dance was aired on TV while still thinkng it was silly.
Because that’s what I felt.[/quote]
Significant difference between “silly” and “pedophile’s fantasy” no?[/quote]
I did not even want to fuck her, let alone the teddies.
So, “pedophile’s fantasy” seems far fetched.
[quote]orion wrote:
[quote]four60 wrote:
My only issue is her lack of ass.[/quote]
She has an ass.
A flabby, skinny fat one, not befitting someone who should have some training in dancing.[/quote]
See, and this is where T-Nation comes in.
She obviously needs to do more deadlifts.
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]Nards wrote:
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]jbpick86 wrote:
I absolutely cannot understand the outrage from parents on this because the children saw it. [/quote]
[quote]jbpick86 wrote:
As a side note, did anyone feel like they were in like a pedophile’s fantasy world when they watched that, with all the random teddy bears and crap. [/quote]
I’m confused…[/quote]
I’m thinking that one can be OK with the fact that this dance was aired on TV while still thinkng it was silly.
Because that’s what I felt.[/quote]
Significant difference between “silly” and “pedophile’s fantasy” no?[/quote]
Well a pedophile’s fantasy would be silly if it didn’t include plans on what to do with the body. usually a kid’s torso by itself will fit nicely into a microwave so that it can be reheated and used again a few times.
Indeed I went too far.
[quote]Nards wrote:
Indeed I went too far.[/quote]
The line was a fair way back indeed, you Usain Bolted a good distance past the line methinks.