Unhung Hero Trailer

[quote]Varqanir wrote:

[quote]theBeth wrote:

[quote]on edge wrote:

[quote]Varqanir wrote:

[quote]theBeth wrote:
Does anyone think that guys with small penises are less likely to cheat?[/quote]

Don’t know about penis size, but propensity to have multiple partners does positively correlate to testicular volume.

Which just means that cheaters are pretty ballsy. [/quote]

Did you make that up to set up the punch line or is that true? I got the consolation prize of having huge balls but I haven’t cheated on a chick since I was 21. -At least not fully cheated. As late as 23 I did fool around a bit w/o fully cheating. [/quote]

has nothing to do with ball size. my adulturous buddies at the gym have no balls. I’ve seen one of them naked. literally looked like his testicles were undescended because he’s been juiced out of his gourd for 15 years. [/quote]

My dear, do think about what you’re saying.

Higher testicular volume would suggest what? Higher testosterone production. Yes. And the adulterous gym buddies had atrophied testicles because why? They were on androgenic steroids, or in you words, “juiced out of their gourds” for, in one case, fifteen years. It’s reasonable to presume, therefore, that the variable is testosterone, and that the more T a man (or a woman, by the way) has, the more likely he (or she) is to have (or at least want) other partners than the one he (or she) happens to be fucking at the time.

I went back and looked at the research, and found an interesting side fact that I had forgotten: testicular volume correlates positively, in primate species, to the propensity of the FEMALES of the species to cheat. The more likely one’s girlfriend is to fuck another guy, the bigger one’s balls have to be to compensate, it seems. So human females are not so promiscuous as chimpanzee and bonobo females (like you didn’t know that!) but more promiscuous, it seems, than gorilla females, if the ratios of testicular volume to body size of the three species are compared.

You may draw your own conclusions about black, white and Asian women. [/quote]

The thing is, they have tiny peckers. Another reason for the big balls on these animals is sperm wars, effectively flushing sperm from the prior male with your own. It pays for an alpha to be both dominant and potent. So, you could look at it as the entire species being promiscuous, both male and female, they evolved to have competitive sex that way.

With us, we tend to care for the offspring as well as the female so it’s more important for us to know for certain that that baby is ours as males, where the females know for certain it is theirs we need to fret as it’s a huge investment of our time and resources to raise a child, this is more an anthropological comparison.

The other thing, women can be stimulated in all sorts of ways as Beth says. Some women experience pleasure with cervical stimulation while others may only reach orgasm via Clit and G spot. I’m guessing the lucky woman can experience all 3 and there are more that I haven’t mentioned including reaching climax via other holes lol. But there are also women who struggle to reach orgasm at all. So being long enough to reach the cervix may be critical for some women to experience pleasure, most women really enjoy girth though, feeling of being stuffed or filled.

I’m not a moose, but yeah there are women who experience discomfort. It’s not too bad, usually means deep penetration positions like doggy or carrying positions can be uncomfortable, possibly painful so you need to find other positions or take it easy which can actually kinda suck. But most women love a large but not monstrous penis whether they experience cervical orgasm or not.

I do believe there is a sweet spot range, maybe some of the women could chime in on this lol.

Ok Varq, I stand corrected. However. Ball size, scientifically speaking, doesn’t always correlate to higher test production. That stuff begins in the hypothalamus/pituitary blah blah. Maybe actual testicle organ size does correlate, but some people have fatty or water filled sacks with small testicles inside. Not claiming to have palpated alot of balls, but it sounds like a fun experiment.

P.S. When I was in EMS I had to transport a guy who had testicles the size of a cantaloupe. I say cantaloupe cus that’s what the skin texture looked like. He was also 600lb. I wonder what that sort of thing does to test production. I hope Derek will have some stories to add…

[quote]theBeth wrote:
Ok Varq, I stand corrected. However. Ball size, scientifically speaking, doesn’t always correlate to higher test production. That stuff begins in the hypothalamus/pituitary blah blah. Maybe actual testicle organ size does correlate, but some people have fatty or water filled sacks with small testicles inside. Not claiming to have palpated alot of balls, but it sounds like a fun experiment.[/quote]

Yep. Scrotums are kinda strange right? My skin down there ranges from super loose to super tight, depending on all kinds of things. Some days it’s a boon to wear tight underwear because they flop around, other days the scrotum is so tight it’s kinda like a support bra for the boys. Hope that wasn’t tmi, just comfortable with this stuff.

[quote]theBeth wrote:
I hope Derek will have some stories to add…[/quote]

They’re just as grotesque as his pictures!

Easier to skip without noticing, though…