Already solved on T-Nation
[quote]2busy wrote:
Already solved on T-Nation
[/quote]
I kept a close eye on that thread but sadly I must have missed any solution postulated therein.
[quote]theBeth wrote:
[quote]2busy wrote:
Already solved on T-Nation
[/quote]
I kept a close eye on that thread but sadly I must have missed any solution postulated therein.[/quote]
You have to search the Manswers episodes, lol
They had a surgical procedure and a external extension device covered.
[quote]theBeth wrote:
Does anyone think that guys with small penises are less likely to cheat?[/quote]
Don’t know about penis size, but propensity to have multiple partners does positively correlate to testicular volume.
Which just means that cheaters are pretty ballsy.
[quote]theBeth wrote:
Does anyone think that guys with small penises are less likely to cheat?[/quote]
More likely to be cheated on, perhaps…
In my opinion, YES, guys with smaller penises appear to be:
- More likely to WANT to get engaged/married.
- less likely to cheat and usually stick with the first girl that says “yes”.
- they’re usually more vocal in their support for smaller boobs/ass, saying they prefer “small handfuls” or that “size doesn’t matter”, usually hoping that little phrase inspires the girl to feel the same way about their equipment.
- more likely to be cheated on ALL other things remaining the same, but ANY guy can be cheated on regardless of size, status and income.
[quote]theBeth wrote:
Does anyone think that guys with small penises are less likely to cheat?[/quote]
[quote]Varqanir wrote:
[quote]theBeth wrote:
Does anyone think that guys with small penises are less likely to cheat?[/quote]
Don’t know about penis size, but propensity to have multiple partners does positively correlate to testicular volume.
Which just means that cheaters are pretty ballsy. [/quote]
Did you make that up to set up the punch line or is that true? I got the consolation prize of having huge balls but I haven’t cheated on a chick since I was 21. -At least not fully cheated. As late as 23 I did fool around a bit w/o fully cheating.
[quote]on edge wrote:
[quote]Varqanir wrote:
[quote]theBeth wrote:
Does anyone think that guys with small penises are less likely to cheat?[/quote]
Don’t know about penis size, but propensity to have multiple partners does positively correlate to testicular volume.
Which just means that cheaters are pretty ballsy. [/quote]
Did you make that up to set up the punch line or is that true? I got the consolation prize of having huge balls but I haven’t cheated on a chick since I was 21. -At least not fully cheated. As late as 23 I did fool around a bit w/o fully cheating. [/quote]
has nothing to do with ball size. my adulturous buddies at the gym have no balls. I’ve seen one of them naked. literally looked like his testicles were undescended because he’s been juiced out of his gourd for 15 years.
[quote]theBeth wrote:
Does anyone think that guys with small penises are less likely to cheat?[/quote]
I actually think it makes them MORE likely to cheat than a man with an “average” penis. They will most certainly have deep seated insecurities about it and will act on those insecurities. They may seek to “prove” that they have what it takes by “sowing their seed” into whatever hole they can.
Conversely, a man with a “large” penis will be very comfortable with himself and not be driven by any insecurity. He MAY, however, be driven by narcissism and thus more likely to “spread the love, cuz there’s a LOT of it”.
I would say that the “average” sized penis having man is the least likely to cheat, but there are plenty of examples there as well.
In conclusion, I don’t think penis size is a valid litmus test for cheating, there are FAR more effective markers to look at, such as WHAT IS THE STATUS OF HIS PARENTS. Which would give him the models he built his relationship paradigm on. But even so, people can evolve past their programming, so that’s not 100% either.
GPS. Definitely the way to go. Sorry.
[quote]angry chicken wrote:
[quote]theBeth wrote:
Does anyone think that guys with small penises are less likely to cheat?[/quote]
I actually think it makes them MORE likely to cheat than a man with an “average” penis. They will most certainly have deep seated insecurities about it and will act on those insecurities. They may seek to “prove” that they have what it takes by “sowing their seed” into whatever hole they can.
Conversely, a man with a “large” penis will be very comfortable with himself and not be driven by any insecurity. He MAY, however, be driven by narcissism and thus more likely to “spread the love, cuz there’s a LOT of it”.
I would say that the “average” sized penis having man is the least likely to cheat, but there are plenty of examples there as well.
In conclusion, I don’t think penis size is a valid litmus test for cheating, there are FAR more effective markers to look at, such as WHAT IS THE STATUS OF HIS PARENTS. Which would give him the models he built his relationship paradigm on. But even so, people can evolve past their programming, so that’s not 100% either.
GPS. Definitely the way to go. Sorry.[/quote]
I’d agree with that. Parental status is a good marker…I look more at personality markers now though. And never date anyone at the gym.
That’s nowhere near the ‘never date anyone at work’ rule…You probably made
that up because you or someone very close to you had a bad experience with it.
I’ve dated girls from the Gym no problem, and if one ever goes bad, it’s much easier
to switch Gyms than to change Jobs so don’t broad brush that no dating at the Gym
rule because some of the most positive people in society gather in Gyms, one of the
few places where there are no societal pressures, etc.
Speak for yourself on that one.
[quote]Karado wrote:
That’s nowhere near the ‘never date anyone at work’ rule…You probably made
that up because you or someone very close to you had a bad experience with it.
I’ve dated girls from the Gym no problem, and if one ever goes bad, it’s much easier
to switch Gyms than to change Jobs so don’t broad brush that no dating at the Gym
rule because some of the most positive people in society gather in Gyms, one of the
few places where there are no societal pressures, etc.
Speak for yourself on that one.[/quote]
I don’t date the guys at the gym cus I know where they’ve been, that’s all. And I am speaking for myself. I guess you live in a highly populated area because up here you don’t just switch gyms. Don’t get me wrong, I love my gym bros they are like family to me. It’s true that alot of positive people gather there but there’s also alot of neurotic, narcissistic, and insecure people as well. I lift for my own neurosis.
[quote]theBeth wrote:
[quote]on edge wrote:
[quote]Varqanir wrote:
[quote]theBeth wrote:
Does anyone think that guys with small penises are less likely to cheat?[/quote]
Don’t know about penis size, but propensity to have multiple partners does positively correlate to testicular volume.
Which just means that cheaters are pretty ballsy. [/quote]
Did you make that up to set up the punch line or is that true? I got the consolation prize of having huge balls but I haven’t cheated on a chick since I was 21. -At least not fully cheated. As late as 23 I did fool around a bit w/o fully cheating. [/quote]
has nothing to do with ball size. my adulturous buddies at the gym have no balls. I’ve seen one of them naked. literally looked like his testicles were undescended because he’s been juiced out of his gourd for 15 years. [/quote]
My dear, do think about what you’re saying.
Higher testicular volume would suggest what? Higher testosterone production. Yes. And the adulterous gym buddies had atrophied testicles because why? They were on androgenic steroids, or in you words, “juiced out of their gourds” for, in one case, fifteen years. It’s reasonable to presume, therefore, that the variable is testosterone, and that the more T a man (or a woman, by the way) has, the more likely he (or she) is to have (or at least want) other partners than the one he (or she) happens to be fucking at the time.
I went back and looked at the research, and found an interesting side fact that I had forgotten: testicular volume correlates positively, in primate species, to the propensity of the FEMALES of the species to cheat. The more likely one’s girlfriend is to fuck another guy, the bigger one’s balls have to be to compensate, it seems. So human females are not so promiscuous as chimpanzee and bonobo females (like you didn’t know that!) but more promiscuous, it seems, than gorilla females, if the ratios of testicular volume to body size of the three species are compared.
You may draw your own conclusions about black, white and Asian women.
[quote]theBeth wrote:
[quote]Varqanir wrote:
[quote]theBeth wrote:
[quote]Varqanir wrote:
You know, fair’s fair: I wonder how many men have broken up with their girlfriends or fiancees for no other reason but that the young ladies in question had hoo-hahs that weren’t tight enough. [/quote]
It’s ok to say vagina. And we still have another hole that’s tight if the Vag seems like throwing a hot dog down a hallway.
Guys have no such option. And there’s a whole culture of people who don’t really care about penis size because they’re more into all the other things you can do…I’m not necessarily saying libertine, but some people get off on more than vanilla sex.
I had a sex dream about Jack Black last night. It was pretty good.[/quote]
I had actually written “vaginas” but changed it to “hoo-hahs” because I think that’s a funny expression. Rather like “wiener” is funnier than “penis”, and “anus” simply cannot compete, for comic effect, with “poop chute”, as Frank Zappa made abundantly plain.
I told you before, Beth. I like all flavors of ice cream, not just vanilla.
You’ll have to tell me about that dream sometime. Sounds intriguing. [/quote]
I prefer to say ‘vulva’, cus it sounds dirtier. And there’s something so naked about saying penis. It makes the room go silent. Although sometimes I call it a blood sausage. and vagina is “hair pie”.
Would you like some blood sausage in your hair pie?
You’re welcome.[/quote]
I’m wondering what your moist cunt tastes like.
Moist and cunt in one sentence kills any sort of urge to fuck.
[quote]Varqanir wrote:
You know, fair’s fair: I wonder how many men have broken up with their girlfriends or fiancees for no other reason but that the young ladies in question had hoo-hahs that weren’t tight enough. [/quote]
I have done it to a girl because of her hairy corn hole, but I was looking for an excuse and that was the straw, as they say.
[quote]mutantcolors wrote:
[quote]Varqanir wrote:
You know, fair’s fair: I wonder how many men have broken up with their girlfriends or fiancees for no other reason but that the young ladies in question had hoo-hahs that weren’t tight enough. [/quote]
I have done it to a girl because of her hairy corn hole, but I was looking for an excuse and that was the straw, as they say.[/quote]
Hairy cornhole, huh? Yeah, that’ll do it. If it ain’t one thing it’s another.
Al Yankovic, he be funny and super clean…His shows are attended by Parents and
their Kids with no fear of offensive lyrics, etc. and make me wonder if that’s an official
video, a clever animator’s interpretation of it, or maybe Al has a PG-13 version of the
show…heh.
But cutting the Mustard once again, his ‘‘Mama Cass’’ Elliot reference about being ‘choked up’
is false because for decades that was the pervading urban myth…she had a heart attack,
no chokey on Sandwich whatsoever.
Col. Mustard has spoken.
[quote]Varqanir wrote:
I went back and looked at the research, and found an interesting side fact that I had forgotten: testicular volume correlates positively, in primate species, to the propensity of the FEMALES of the species to cheat. The more likely one’s girlfriend is to fuck another guy, the bigger one’s balls have to be to compensate, it seems. So human females are not so promiscuous as chimpanzee and bonobo females (like you didn’t know that!) but more promiscuous, it seems, than gorilla females, if the ratios of testicular volume to body size of the three species are compared.
You may draw your own conclusions about black, white and Asian women. [/quote]
Yup, it seems to be a tradeoff between reproductive success and testicular cancer.
[quote]Karado wrote:
But cutting the Mustard once again, his ‘‘Mama Cass’’ Elliot reference about being ‘choked up’
is false because for decades that was the pervading urban myth…she had a heart attack,
no chokey on Sandwich whatsoever.
Col. Mustard has spoken.
[/quote]
I am so happy that you have picked up my moniker for you and just owned it.
If there’s anyone who can cut the mustard on a mythical forty-year old ham sandwich, it’s you.