Ugliest / Best Looking College

[quote]pja wrote:

truthfully the girls at MIT aren’t that great…however with the number of colleges in the Boston area there is no shortage of hotties…BC has a good amount of cuties.[/quote]

Absolutely. The nice thing about there being so many colleges there. Boston’s a cool city too.

Most beautiful, University of Colorado, seriously.

Ugliest… I don’t know, howabout Nebraska or Kansas State.

[quote]holifila wrote:
Panther1015 wrote:
Hottest coeds? Easy, University of Texas. No contest.

Please,… UT isn’t even the best in the state. I have spent a great deal of time discussing this topic with grad students from all over the country (and I have visted most). Top 4 in no order

Texas A&M
FSU
U of Az.
and any school in southern cal without good admissions requirements.
[/quote]

Texas A&M? Are you kidding me? Sure there are hot coeds there, but not nearly as many as in Austin. You must be an aggie.

My alma mater, Occidental, is a gorgeous campus that is used in many movies and TV series because of its appearance.

As for hotness, I’d have to say the average guy on the campus of the University of Hawaii is a lot better looking than anywhere else I’ve seen during my travels. Same goes for the ladies. Every time I visit there I see beautiful people.

[quote]NateN wrote:
You seen some of the buildings at Umass Amherst? One looks like a goddamn air conditioner.[/quote]

bro yes. everywhere you go at umass feels like you’re out in the back of where you want to be.

[quote]Panther1015 wrote:
holifila wrote:
Panther1015 wrote:
Hottest coeds? Easy, University of Texas. No contest.

Please,… UT isn’t even the best in the state. I have spent a great deal of time discussing this topic with grad students from all over the country (and I have visted most). Top 4 in no order

Texas A&M
FSU
U of Az.
and any school in southern cal without good admissions requirements.

Texas A&M? Are you kidding me? Sure there are hot coeds there, but not nearly as many as in Austin. You must be an aggie.[/quote]

I have attended both A&M and UT. The hot girl quotient is good in Austin, but this is about the university. Take my word for it, the student body is better.

[quote]holifila wrote:
I have attended both A&M and UT. The hot girl quotient is good in Austin, but this is about the university. Take my word for it, the student body is better.
[/quote]

We’ll just have to agree to disagree. But we can both agree that Texas in general has some pretty fuckin hot girls.

[quote]Panther1015 wrote:
holifila wrote:
I have attended both A&M and UT. The hot girl quotient is good in Austin, but this is about the university. Take my word for it, the student body is better.

We’ll just have to agree to disagree. But we can both agree that Texas in general has some pretty fuckin hot girls.
[/quote]

As an extension, I have found that as one heads north, the level of hotness decreases. I may get flamed for such a statement, but look at the responses so far.

[quote]BostonBarrister wrote:
etaco wrote:
San Diego State has plenty of hotties as well and the city always wins “best looking people” awards. I made the mistake though of going to UC San Diego which is quite a bit less attractive.

Egads, another Triton. I take it the girls there haven’t gotten any better looking since I graduated last century?

Nine out of 10 college girls in San Diego is hot, and the 10th goes to UCSD.[/quote]

I’d say the UC has improved slightly over the last couple years, though that still means it’s overwhelming unappealing.

UCSB

[quote]holifila wrote:
Panther1015 wrote:
holifila wrote:
I have attended both A&M and UT. The hot girl quotient is good in Austin, but this is about the university. Take my word for it, the student body is better.

We’ll just have to agree to disagree. But we can both agree that Texas in general has some pretty fuckin hot girls.

As an extension, I have found that as one heads north, the level of hotness decreases. I may get flamed for such a statement, but look at the responses so far. [/quote]

Definitely true. Especially in California. Although the reverse may be true with intelligence…

Prettiest Campus without a doubt is Dartmouth in Hanover NH. It is the quintessential college town…unfortunately women arent anything too special

BC has some hot girls but they are all little rich daddies girls for the most part, same goes for Georgetown. MIT girls look like they got hit in the head with a rusty shovel.

[quote]etaco wrote:
Definitely true. Especially in California. Although the reverse may be true with intelligence…[/quote]

Yes, it’s noticeable. Partly because of clothing: (1) it’s cold - wear lots of threads - let yourself go. (2) it’s warm - wear less - need to look good in less, so take better care.

California is complicated though. SoCal is so shallow and vain: think Hollywood, Hummers, and coke. NorCal is about real people: think global, Subarus, and dark beer.

Bastard

Anyone going to “The World’s Largest Outdoor Cocktail Party” this year?

A buddy of mine and his whole family are a Gator grads and rave about it. I’m thinking about popping in.

Bastard

[quote]holifila wrote:
Panther1015 wrote:
holifila wrote:
I have attended both A&M and UT. The hot girl quotient is good in Austin, but this is about the university. Take my word for it, the student body is better.

We’ll just have to agree to disagree. But we can both agree that Texas in general has some pretty fuckin hot girls.

As an extension, I have found that as one heads north, the level of hotness decreases. I may get flamed for such a statement, but look at the responses so far. [/quote]

That’s pretty much true. There are hot girls everywhere, but it noticeably decreases per capita as you head further north. However, I must point out that in Boston, there are a lot of hot Portugese, Irish and Italian honeys. Not sure why there are fewer attractive girls up north though.

Texas schools have more hot girls, simple as that. I went to A&M, my freshman year we had a 2 to 1 ratio females to males. Life was good, very good. Got better every year ratio wise from what I’ve heard.

Biggest difference in the girls at Texas A&M and the girls at UT (or tu for the Aggies in the crowd)is the amount of facial peircings on average and the proclivity to be bisexual. What is it about Austin that makes people into freaks?

Ugliest campus? Far and away, SUNY Albany, the second largest poured concrete structure on earth, after the pentagon. This place s GROSS!

Best looking campus? Middlebury College, In Middlebury Vermont.

[quote]Panther1015 wrote:

As an extension, I have found that as one heads north, the level of hotness decreases. I may get flamed for such a statement, but look at the responses so far.

That’s pretty much true. There are hot girls everywhere, but it noticeably decreases per capita as you head further north. However, I must point out that in Boston, there are a lot of hot Portugese, Irish and Italian honeys. Not sure why there are fewer attractive girls up north though.
[/quote]

Sorry guys…it’s not because I’m biased but I think this statment is pretty valid. I honestly do think the girls in the south get outside more because it’s warm year round. What BFG said regarding less clothing = girls taking better care of themselves is true and can be applied not on to SouthernCal. You see a lot more tans, blondes and short shorts with nice legs. Obviously there will be beautiful girls spotted everywhere around the world… but as far as the US, the south has more overall. I’ve always thought the prettiest girls could be found in SouthCal, some parts of Texas, GA and some parts of Fl. Now don’t get be wrong, I promise I’m not being biased, I’m telling you what I’ve personally seen by comparing the southern places I’ve been to, to the northern places I’ve visited. This is by far not the end all be all…this is just my opinion.

[quote]SouthernGirl wrote:
Panther1015 wrote:

As an extension, I have found that as one heads north, the level of hotness decreases. I may get flamed for such a statement, but look at the responses so far.

That’s pretty much true. There are hot girls everywhere, but it noticeably decreases per capita as you head further north. However, I must point out that in Boston, there are a lot of hot Portugese, Irish and Italian honeys. Not sure why there are fewer attractive girls up north though.

Sorry guys…it’s not because I’m biased but I think this statment is pretty valid. I honestly do think the girls in the south get outside more because it’s warm year round. What BFG said regarding less clothing = girls taking better care of themselves is true and can be applied not on to SouthernCal. You see a lot more tans, blondes and short shorts with nice legs. Obviously there will be beautiful girls spotted everywhere around the world… but as far as the US, the south has more overall. I’ve always thought the prettiest girls could be found in SouthCal, some parts of Texas, GA and some parts of Fl. Now don’t get be wrong, I promise I’m not being biased, I’m telling you what I’ve personally seen by comparing the southern places I’ve been to, to the northern places I’ve visited. This is by far not the end all be all…this is just my opinion. [/quote]

Just wanted to say your avatar is cool, like a square with eyes and a mouth.

[quote]SouthernGirl wrote:
Obviously there will be beautiful girls spotted everywhere around the world… but as far as the US, the south has more overall. I’ve always thought the prettiest girls could be found in SouthCal, some parts of Texas, GA and some parts of Fl. [/quote]

I definitely agree. However, I think Manhattan violates this general rule. As well as some of the wealthier suburbs in the Northeast where the girls have the money, time, and inclination to work on their bodies and put themselves together well.