UFC 91 - Couture vs. Lesnar

[quote]3rdegreebyrne wrote:
KBCThird wrote:
3rdegreebyrne wrote:
KBCThird wrote:
3rdegreebyrne wrote:
Fedor would still beat him I believe.

Really? You sure you want to go out on a limb like that and say that you think the best fighter and the best p4p fighter might beat brock? Do you wanna go out on another limb and say that Obama will win last week’s election?

Hahaha, sarcasm - you funny. Read the whole post and contribute something thoughtful next time - like a comment on your opinion of different styles and how they affect fight outcomes perhaps? Or maybe something about my future fight predictions.

I read the whole post, and chose not to point out the inconsistency that you wanted brock to lose against mir because he hadnt paid his dues, but now, two whole fights later, that is apparently not an issue.

What else did you want me to comment on, you repeating that styles make fights? No kidding?

Or the future possibility of randy vs fedor? well, while it’s even more unlikely to happen now, i’d still pay to see it

All I’m saying is that you picked out a pretty insignificant comment out of my post that had nothing to do with the main theme of what I was saying - when you could have just left it alone. If you thought my post redundant - than fine, keep it to yourself. About my inconstancy. I virtually knew nothing about Lesner when he vs’ed Mir, all i knew was it was another technique vs muscles match and I wanted technqiue to win. Seeing him a couple more times - I think he has got what it takes, only just a little bit more down the road.[/quote]

I picked out what stuck out to me as a pretty big understatement in an otherwise blase post that didnt really have much to respond to. Your suggestion that I keep it to myself is both hilarious and absurd. If you see nothing humorous in what I said, fine. But if you have such a problem with people busting balls on an internet forum, I really dont know what to tell you, cuz it aint gonna stop.

[quote]dhickey wrote:

Would you rather be born with genes for being fast and explosive, or slow? Wouldn’t this translate to being good at your chosen sport if you applied the effort?

There are people that are given great athletic gifts. I would say anyone in the NFL. If more of these gifted athletes chose to persue MMA, we will see a better pool of fighters. Right now these athletes are, more often than not. chosing Football, Baseball, Basketball, or Hockey up here. This is the point. I am not sure how we got into tiger playing water polo or whatever you where talking about? You missed the point completely.[/quote]

I think more American HW athletes(200+pounds) will gravitate towards mma. Though there are already are or were some great athletes in mma. Ricardo Arona, Rampage Jackson, Crocop, Mark Kerr, Belfort, Yamamoto Kid for example. Guys who would fight in ww or lw would probably never make the NFL anyway. The rest of the world is probably already putting their best athletes in combat sports, wrestling, judo, boxing, mma. Russia might become scary in the future with their state sponsored programs in sambo, boxing, judo and wrestling and Fedor being so famous. Applying that to mma and they would have a leg up on everybody.

The fight, in case anyone wants to reevaluate their comments…

[quote]Tallguyy76 wrote:
Airtruth wrote:
Tallguyy76 wrote:
dhickey wrote:
Schwarzfahrer wrote:

My post was not a slide against the talent it takes to make the professional level of any sport. I meant compared to other baseball players at the elite level they were average. Would you call either hall of fame players? That does not detract from the fact that they were freak of nature alactic athletes and incredible football players. Would either win a marathon?
[/quote]
No they are not hall of famers, as you said they were average. My point is that they were average PRO’s which means theres a very good chance if they spent ALL their time playing baseball they would have been hall of famers, but these great athletes do not want to give up football.
Deion some think ran a 4.01 40… whether this is outlandish or not is one thing, but to have that kind of speed he may very well have ran the fastest marathon ever if he decided to run marathons from the age Kenyans start at. So as every one is saying the genetic freak pool is lower for sports that are not part of the big 3 in America.

[quote]
Would someone with the anatomy and physical talents of an NFL defensive end ever have the tools to beat Roger Federor in a tennis match? Linebacker? Eh maybe a corner? My point was that people gravitate towards sports they are naturally good at and at the elite levels competition selects those who have the most natural talent and gifts to succeed. You can’t use the same measuring stick for all athletes. [/quote]

After 30 of course not, but you take a genetic freak line backer or corner from 5 years old tell him to concentrate only on tennis then YES he may have the tools to beat Roger Federer. Linebackers and corners have to eat and train to have the bodies their position requires, but the speed and reaction times they have are still far above athletes they competed against in high school and college. Which is why they made it to the elite level.

this statement “My point was that people gravitate towards sports they are naturally good at and at the elite levels competition selects those who have the most natural talent and gifts to succeed.”

IS TOTALLY WRONG. Proof is any park where you see a ton of people who gravitated towards basketball but weren’t good enough to make it, or any flag football league with guys who couldn’t make it pro, same thing for softball, running, marathons or anything else for thatmatter. People love doing what they like, not what they’re bodies were designed for…(with the exception of china). In fact people tend to do and succeed most at what others tell them they can’t do.

I think your missing the point of what everybody is trying to say. There are athletic qualities that allow you to be successful, or have the potential to be successful. In general in america the people with the best qualities will be pushed towards the big 3 sports. Those people may have been superb athletes at another sport.

With 40 time your looking at the most specific quality, but less take an athletic quality like high testosterone. If you have guy A whose body supplies him with a constant dose of double the average person, he’s going to be great at football, baseball, basketball, tennis, MMA, or whatever he decides to focus on. But, he will end up focusing on football, because that is whats big.

[quote]dhickey wrote:
Tallguyy76 wrote:
Airtruth wrote:
Tallguyy76 wrote:
dhickey wrote:
Schwarzfahrer wrote:

I catch your drift but different sports select for different mental and physical attributes. This is why I don’t get it when people compare all athletes to American football players. I have seen maybe 2 legit two sport pro athletes. Bo Jackson and Deon(sp)Sanders and they were mediocre at baseball.

Guys like Tony Gonzalez and Terrell Owens are better then average but nothing special when they dabble in basketball. Fedor is a world Sambo champion, Matt Lindland is an Olympic silver medalist, Yoshida is an Olympic gold medalist as was Kevin Jackson.

Couture and Dan Henderson were both Olympic alternates. There are several BJJ world champions. There are plenty of world class level athletes in MMA and they have had varying success.

How do you even define world class athlete? Depends on your sport. Lance Armstrong and Usain Bolt are both classifeid as elite athletes but their sports select for totally opposing physical traits.

I was reading a post on Elite FTS from The Thinker and he made a good point about the difference between being a physical specimen and having talent at your sport with Brock Lesnar being a prime example. He is a physical specimen but lacked the football talent to play in the NFL.

Just like guys like Johnny Morton or Bob Sapp lacked the talent to go far in fighting. In the end talent reigns supreme. Brock won last night because his talent for fighting was greater then Randy’s edge in experience.

Then there’s the mental component. People in individual sports tend to be EXTREMELY self driven overachievers. I know there are people with freakish work ethics in team sports but all in all people in individual sports just seem to be cut from a different cloth.

In fighting having 4.2 40, a 40 inch vertical, bench pressing 400 lbs are great but can you display that athleticism when your exhausted or getting punched in the face.

They compare athletes to American football because American Football uses the most athletic qualities of any sport within the multiple positions required to play the game. Offensive lineman tend to have very high IQ’s, quarterbacks have to be able to handle pressure situations, safety’s need endurance, strength speed, the ability to read a persons eyes, quickness, toughness, anticipation, and concentration. I’d put someone Polamulu athletic prowess up against anybody.

Did you even semi look at the crazy shit you just typed? Bo and Deon were average baseball players? How many people play ONLY baseball year round (including camps) and can’t make it to the pros? Making a pro team is not average, making a pro team as a side job is definitely not average. Your practically making the point for dhickey that MMA doesn’t have the genetic freaks, because at some point you do need skill to win, and if you have a genetic freak spending 6 days a week for 10 years on football, try wrestling or MMA for 3 months then lose a fight, he’s going to be like “fuck this it’s not meant for me”. Who knows what he may have done if he spent 10 years training.

My post was not a slide against the talent it takes to make the professional level of any sport. I meant compared to other baseball players at the elite level they were average. Would you call either hall of fame players? That does not detract from the fact that they were freak of nature alactic athletes and incredible football players. Would either win a marathon?

Would someone with the anatomy and physical talents of an NFL defensive end ever have the tools to beat Roger Federor in a tennis match? Linebacker? Eh maybe a corner? My point was that people gravitate towards sports they are naturally good at and at the elite levels competition selects those who have the most natural talent and gifts to succeed. You can’t use the same measuring stick for all athletes.

Would you rather be born with genes for being fast and explosive, or slow? Wouldn’t this translate to being good at your chosen sport if you applied the effort?

There are people that are given great athletic gifts. I would say anyone in the NFL. If more of these gifted athletes chose to persue MMA, we will see a better pool of fighters. Right now these athletes are, more often than not. chosing Football, Baseball, Basketball, or Hockey up here. This is the point. I am not sure how we got into tiger playing water polo or whatever you where talking about? You missed the point completely.[/quote]

Football players are given great athletic gifts to play football. Basketball players to play basketball. It’s not that interchangable. There’s a reason why the Eastern Bloc and now the Chinese screen athletes at a young age to see who has a natural inclination to what sport. Do you not agree that people that succeed in combat sports have gifts specific to their sports? Most say punching power is something you have or don’t have. A great chin? I get what you are saying that on average football players jump higher, are more explosive ect then MMA fighter and I agree.

The nature of their sport rewards people who are fast and explosive in an anaerobic alactic environment. My point that those traits are specific to the needs of football and talent in one sport or general athleticism does not guarantee success across the board. The sport chooses the athlete as much as the athlete chooses the sport at the ELITE levels.

[quote]Airtruth wrote:
Tallguyy76 wrote:
Airtruth wrote:
Tallguyy76 wrote:
dhickey wrote:
Schwarzfahrer wrote:

My post was not a slide against the talent it takes to make the professional level of any sport. I meant compared to other baseball players at the elite level they were average. Would you call either hall of fame players? That does not detract from the fact that they were freak of nature alactic athletes and incredible football players. Would either win a marathon?

No they are not hall of famers, as you said they were average. My point is that they were average PRO’s which means theres a very good chance if they spent ALL their time playing baseball they would have been hall of famers, but these great athletes do not want to give up football.
Deion some think ran a 4.01 40… whether this is outlandish or not is one thing, but to have that kind of speed he may very well have ran the fastest marathon ever if he decided to run marathons from the age Kenyans start at. So as every one is saying the genetic freak pool is lower for sports that are not part of the big 3 in America.

Would someone with the anatomy and physical talents of an NFL defensive end ever have the tools to beat Roger Federor in a tennis match? Linebacker? Eh maybe a corner? My point was that people gravitate towards sports they are naturally good at and at the elite levels competition selects those who have the most natural talent and gifts to succeed. You can’t use the same measuring stick for all athletes.

After 30 of course not, but you take a genetic freak line backer or corner from 5 years old tell him to concentrate only on tennis then YES he may have the tools to beat Roger Federer. Linebackers and corners have to eat and train to have the bodies their position requires, but the speed and reaction times they have are still far above athletes they competed against in high school and college. Which is why they made it to the elite level.

this statement “My point was that people gravitate towards sports they are naturally good at and at the elite levels competition selects those who have the most natural talent and gifts to succeed.”

IS TOTALLY WRONG. Proof is any park where you see a ton of people who gravitated towards basketball but weren’t good enough to make it, or any flag football league with guys who couldn’t make it pro, same thing for softball, running, marathons or anything else for thatmatter. People love doing what they like, not what they’re bodies were designed for…(with the exception of china). In fact people tend to do and succeed most at what others tell them they can’t do.

I think your missing the point of what everybody is trying to say. There are athletic qualities that allow you to be successful, or have the potential to be successful. In general in america the people with the best qualities will be pushed towards the big 3 sports. Those people may have been superb athletes at another sport.

With 40 time your looking at the most specific quality, but less take an athletic quality like high testosterone. If you have guy A whose body supplies him with a constant dose of double the average person, he’s going to be great at football, baseball, basketball, tennis, MMA, or whatever he decides to focus on. But, he will end up focusing on football, because that is whats big.[/quote]

Sorry dude. An athlete who is as fast twitch dominate as Deon Sanders is not going to win a marathon no matter when he starts training. Totally different fiber composition and body structure.

[quote]Tallguyy76 wrote:
dhickey wrote:
Tallguyy76 wrote:
Airtruth wrote:
Tallguyy76 wrote:
dhickey wrote:
Schwarzfahrer wrote:

The nature of their sport rewards people who are fast and explosive in an anaerobic alactic environment. My point that those traits are specific to the needs of football and talent in one sport or general athleticism does not guarantee success across the board. The sport chooses the athlete as much as the athlete chooses the sport.
[/quote]

Wow your really simplifying the sport of football, and minimizing the athletic abilities of the players. I didn’t even play football in highschool, but competing against them in other sports you can see how athletic pro football players are.

Several players were excellent wrestlers in highschool, others have shattered teamates faces with a punch, do you think they wouldn’t be good MMA fighters? better yet do you think they are going to give up there multi million dollar contracts for MMA? If I’m a senior in highscool and a top 100 recruit for football or a top 10 recruit for wrestling what do you think it’s likely I’m going to do?

[quote]Tallguyy76 wrote:
Airtruth wrote:
Tallguyy76 wrote:

Sorry dude. An athlete who is as fast twitch dominate as Deon Sanders is not going to win a marathon no matter when he starts training. Totally different fiber composition and body structure.

[/quote]

LOL,
Ok your basing your understanding of sports performance by 12 week studies of average males.

[quote]Airtruth wrote:
Tallguyy76 wrote:
Airtruth wrote:
Tallguyy76 wrote:

Sorry dude. An athlete who is as fast twitch dominate as Deon Sanders is not going to win a marathon no matter when he starts training. Totally different fiber composition and body structure.

LOL,
Ok your basing your understanding of sports performance by 12 week studies of average males. [/quote]

No actually I’m basing my opinion on my own personal experience and observations. I went to high school in North Carolina which is basketball country and have seen too many guys who had the athletic ability to play division one ball but lacked that mentality or game to compete with lesser pure athletes. Not trying to argue just saying that there are a ton of unique qualities specific to each sport. Some learned some natural. Just my opinion based on my observations. End of hijack.

[quote]Airtruth wrote:
Tallguyy76 wrote:
Airtruth wrote:
Tallguyy76 wrote:

Sorry dude. An athlete who is as fast twitch dominate as Deon Sanders is not going to win a marathon no matter when he starts training. Totally different fiber composition and body structure.

LOL,
Ok your basing your understanding of sports performance by 12 week studies of average males. [/quote]

Thinking that someone who can sprint 40 yards unbelievably fast could have blown away world records in the marathon if he’d have trained that from childhood makes no sense to me. Sprinting and long distance running are two different activites requiring two different body types to excel. It’s like saying Ryan Kennelly could have set world records for pushups if he’d trained those instead of his bench press. It’s ludicrous.

The heavyweight divisions overly large weight gap of 60 pounds is being exposed. While larger athletes like Sylvia have been in it before, as more genetically gifted guys enter, the division will need to be split up. Won’t be for awhile though, as the division is currently too thin. The fight didn’t surprise me. I wanted Randy to win, but Brock has demonstrated both physical skills as well as improvement. If he wants to be and puts in the time, he will become a true force.

His persona, wwe background, and superior genetics will not win him some mma fans, but I am happy to see a new competitor in the mix. Dude can be an unlikeable scumbad, but I will still watch him compete. More interesting will be our getting so witness the development of his skills. Most guys coming in now are already fairly well rounded, so he is somewhat of a throwback to the guys of old coming in with primarily one discipline. Its even more a testament to his genetics to have him come this far. Sad to see Coture lose that way though, as he was clearly the more skilled fighter.

I do not think Lesnar is the future people hes fought said Sylvia hit much harder, its funny how finally one big heavyweight does well and all of the sudden the heavyweight division is going to have to change. If memory serves me right the best fighter in the world is a 230 pound heavyweight.

[quote]BlackSabbath wrote:
The heavyweight divisions overly large weight gap of 60 pounds is being exposed. While larger athletes like Sylvia have been in it before, as more genetically gifted guys enter, the division will need to be split up. Won’t be for awhile though, as the division is currently too thin. The fight didn’t surprise me. I wanted Randy to win, but Brock has demonstrated both physical skills as well as improvement. If he wants to be and puts in the time, he will become a true force.

His persona, wwe background, and superior genetics will not win him some mma fans, but I am happy to see a new competitor in the mix. Dude can be an unlikeable scumbad, but I will still watch him compete. More interesting will be our getting so witness the development of his skills. Most guys coming in now are already fairly well rounded, so he is somewhat of a throwback to the guys of old coming in with primarily one discipline. Its even more a testament to his genetics to have him come this far. Sad to see Coture lose that way though, as he was clearly the more skilled fighter.[/quote]

This sounds familiar. I remember several years ago in HW boxing when McCline, Grant, the Klitchkos, Lennox Lewis, were all fighting there were some who said there needs to be a super heavyweight division. I think all these guys have lost to smaller fighters.

All it will do is just dilute the talent. And smaller HWs have always shown throughout combat sport history that they can compete and win. I think you need those guys in the same division.

[quote]analog_kid wrote:
CaliforniaLaw wrote:
analog_kid wrote: He might freak out and piss his pants if he has to fight covered in blood.

Doubt it. Highly.

Lesnar has the Midwestern/farm boy tough thing going for him. In addition to his actual training. A little bit of blood isn’t nothing he didn’t see growing up in Minnesota.

Living in Cali but having grown up elsewhere, I appreciate the toughness that working on a farm and going through long cold winters breeds.

No way he’s going to freak out over blood.

That was just a bit of sarcasm on my part. Still, the guy really hasn’t had some one stand in front of him and punch him in the face yet. Could very much be non-issue but you never know.

I think blood plays a role in fights. The extent of that role varies greatly from fighter to fighter. Brock might be a bleeder. Anything can happen.

I agree with you on Randy just not being the fighter everyone makes him out to be. 6 months ago everyone was talking like he could beat Fedor(which is something I never believed), now he is going to be killed by a big giant MMA newb? Which is it people?

PS - People from Minnesota are pussies. Just ask anyone from Wisconsin.

[/quote]

Easy now.

There is all this hype about Brocks wrestling pedigree…

I wont deny that he is a great athlete
fast, strong blah blah blah.

Heavyweights typically are the “weakest”
wrestlers as far as ability In NCAA
sad but true- they division usually has
very little depth and usually the most atheletic type do well.

I dont think he has the pedigree that people claim NCAA title or not.

There is no denying his size and speed will give plenty of people problems more so then his wrestling.

kmc

[quote]kmcnyc wrote:
There is all this hype about Brocks wrestling pedigree…

I wont deny that he is a great athlete
fast, strong blah blah blah.

Heavyweights typically are the “weakest”
wrestlers as far as ability In NCAA
sad but true- they division usually has
very little depth and usually the most atheletic type do well.

I dont think he has the pedigree that people claim NCAA title or not.

There is no denying his size and speed will give plenty of people problems more so then his wrestling.

kmc
[/quote]

This make no sense what so ever. He was dominant as a HW wrestler and now he is fighting as a HW. What else would we be comparing to him to? A HW that was less dominant in his choses sport?

It makes plenty of sense
if you knew anything about NCAA wrestling :wink:
but your in the midwest, so you should have that covered.:slight_smile:

Heavyweight is always the weakest division skill wise and fields fewer athletes then
the other weight classes.
More so when you view the rest of the world’s
heavyweight wrestlers.

Yes he “dominated” and won an NCAA title.
he is a two time NCAA all american
and really he only lost a few times.
so yes he did well.

Its easier to win the NCAA title at heavyweight then other weight classes,
less competition, and less volume.
Lesnar won 105 matches in college
and lost five
most smaller dudes wrestle its allot closer to 200.

Same with MMA how many heavies are their really real ones?
two dozen?

not saying he isnt a freak

kmc

[quote]otoko wrote:
This sounds familiar. I remember several years ago in HW boxing when McCline, Grant, the Klitchkos, Lennox Lewis, were all fighting there were some who said there needs to be a super heavyweight division. I think all these guys have lost to smaller fighters.

All it will do is just dilute the talent. And smaller HWs have always shown throughout combat sport history that they can compete and win. I think you need those guys in the same division.[/quote]

As I said, the talent level in HW is indeed currently too dilute to be split up…right now. Down the line, I can see it being split up once more athletes enter mma as it grows. Do you honestly think the 60 lb weight gap will hold over time? I don’t. Also, comparing mma to boxing is not the same in this instance. MMA lends itself more to a weight advantage than boxing, with the ability to physically lay on an opponent. I am not arguing that smaller fighters can’t sometimes beat the larger, but the weight gap needs to be reasonable or there is no real purpose in having them.

[quote]drewh wrote:
I do not think Lesnar is the future people hes fought said Sylvia hit much harder, its funny how finally one big heavyweight does well and all of the sudden the heavyweight division is going to have to change. If memory serves me right the best fighter in the world is a 230 pound heavyweight.[/quote]

This isn’t all of the sudden. I have thought the weight gap of 60 lbs in heavyweight was too large for awhile now, but the talent pool is not deep enouigh yet to merit a new weight division split. I brought it up now because it seems relevant.

Indeed, Fedor is currently the best. The thing is, when more and more larger and equally athletic guys begin to enter MMA as it continues to grow, the weight disparity will become more of an issue. This seems to me like stating the obvious, but when you take two relatively equally skilled guys with comparitive athletic ability, the larger of the two will be at the advantage. This is the whole reason why weight divisions were implemented. This scenario hasn’t been seen yet, as the majority of the larger guys have been slower, unathletic, not as skilled, etc., but when the talent pool deepens with the sports continual growth, it will become an issue. You may be a fan of old style vale tudo (in which case your answer is probably yes), but would you put two equally skilled guys, one 155er against a 215 lbs heavyweight? Just trying to put it in perpective. The damn weight gap in HW is equivalent to the entire UFC span of weight divisions.

[quote]BlackSabbath wrote:
otoko wrote:
This sounds familiar. I remember several years ago in HW boxing when McCline, Grant, the Klitchkos, Lennox Lewis, were all fighting there were some who said there needs to be a super heavyweight division. I think all these guys have lost to smaller fighters.

All it will do is just dilute the talent. And smaller HWs have always shown throughout combat sport history that they can compete and win. I think you need those guys in the same division.

As I said, the talent level in HW is indeed currently too dilute to be split up…right now. Down the line, I can see it being split up once more athletes enter mma as it grows. Do you honestly think the 60 lb weight gap will hold over time? I don’t. Also, comparing mma to boxing is not the same in this instance. MMA lends itself more to a weight advantage than boxing, with the ability to physically lay on an opponent. I am not arguing that smaller fighters can’t sometimes beat the larger, but the weight gap needs to be reasonable or there is no real purpose in having them.

[/quote]

If you are a HW you know you might face the possibility of fighting somebody significantly bigger. Or you could just cut to LHW. Also while there may be big weight differences at HW they for the most part all have the ability to knock each other out. Also height is not as big an issue compared to a LW fighting a LHW(a 50 pound difference). I am aware that mma is different than boxing, my comparison is that the argument is not new and usually is more of a knee jerk reaction.

It was Randy who lost to Lesnar. A single fight. It was not entirely surprising for Randy to lose to big, strong fighter(Rodriguez, Barnett). Also many guys who are 230 and under are already cutting to LHW. The other fighters are for the most part over 230 at least. It seems to be a self correcting problem.