Tudor Bompa Training Concepts & Opinions

[quote]Spock81 wrote:
I am curious about what country you’re from???[/quote]

Hopefully not anywhere near russia, otherwise big internet fail for asking north americans for lifting reading materials.

[quote]sufiandy wrote:

[quote]Spock81 wrote:
I am curious about what country you’re from???[/quote]

Hopefully not anywhere near russia, otherwise big internet fail for asking north americans for lifting reading materials.[/quote]

Why is fail asking north americans for lifting reading materials ? sorry im beginner and i have 15 years old.

except that on this forum are probably people from different nationalities

I come from Poland.

Witaj, witaj w t-narodu. Mam nadzieje, ze swoja ksiazke.

darn that didn’t work! Google translate does suck. Ima try again

Witaj, witaj w t-narodu. Mam nadzieje, ze ksiazka przynosi wielkie szczescie.

Hi, I actually in 60-70 page,In this book are explained the different training methods such as blocks, the training step, linear, and more, and ask for Greg Haff periodization (linear, block, etc.) and he writes me that there is no such thing as a linear periodization or block, something there Vladimir Issurin wrote and agreed with him on this point.

Overall, it does not seem to me that in this book was a one main workout plan, this book describes the various methods of training (as I wrote) and it says how they work and for what level of player are good, etc.

I do not know how it is but Fred Koch, director of the institute Tudor Bompa wrote the 5th edition does not provide very good training methods Bompy because Greg does not understand them well, can Greg changed Bompy some of these methods in light of the new research.

And I generally do not understand what’s going on with this method of training Bompy, what is it? In the book, I have not met with something like this method of training Bompy in 5 th edition are presented different methods for different zawidników at different levels (there are studies on these methods by various authors, eg Pliska, Stone, etc., even where a table and something from Vladimir Issurin is).

I will say that the book has some severe. I do not know if the translator is wrong Bompa and Haff but sometimes I get the feeling that some things are not written explicitly and easy to listen (even sometimes mistakes occur)