Trump 2025 - Resuming The National Nightmare Of Peace And Prosperity (Part 2)

I’m not sure who this rando is, but he’s been spot-on with some of his commentary regarding Maine and I think he’s spot-on with this assessment of how US Military action is different under Trump compared to the old “uniparty” (to use the same term as Catherine Austin Fitts in the above video) of neocons and woke Democrats.

4 Likes

I’m less than a year into Groyper awareness myself, which began when the “uniparty” wanted us to believe that the guy who killed Kirk was a Groyper who didn’t think Kirk was Groyper enough.

2 Likes

My personal take is that Trump is not part of the “uni-party” or “industrial - military complex” intentionally. But he is playing a game inside of a board he didn’t write the rules for. And from a higher level view, the board game authors and monitors are the interesting tidbit.

2 Likes

Interesting. It also tracks well with Russia and Chinas efforts to seize majority control of the oil supply to topple the US dollar as the primary currency and replace it with the petro dollar, which of course would be their currency.

Its not coincidence that all of the points of contention like northern Africa, Iraq, Venezuela, etc. are oil economies, but its also not “so the us can have cheap gas” as the thick skulled ones would like to believe.

Its to protect the position of the US dollar as the worlds premier currency.

1 Like

Yes. And now we start creeping in to Zionist conspiracy, but historical quotes that begin to read like playbooks in hindsight, AIPAC, direct political involvement and the now exposed Epstein conspiracy trove aside, the general public still isn’t ready for that :wink:

“Give me control over a nation’s currency, and I care not who makes its laws. Mayer Amschel Rothschild (1743–1812)”

It’s almost like we do, in fact, live in a controlled narrative. Chomsky was specifically Ashkenazi - a fun wormhole.

“He who controls the media controls the mind.” — Commonly attributed to Noam Chomsky or Jim Morrison, this phrase highlights media as a tool for shaping perception.

“Propaganda is to a democracy what the bludgeon is to a totalitarian state.” — Noam Chomsky, Manufacturing Consent.

“The smart way to keep people passive and obedient is to strictly limit the spectrum of acceptable opinion…” — Noam Chomsky.

“Any dictator would admire the uniformity and obedience of the U.S. media.” — Noam Chomsky.

“We are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy…” — John F. Kennedy, 1961.

“A time will come when people will be amazed at the naivety with which the economically privileged few influenced, managed and manipulated public opinion…” — Often attributed to Albert Einstein.

“Today we live in a society in which spurious realities are manufactured by the media…” — Philip K. Dick.
JFK Library
JFK Library
+5

5 Likes

I would add, “they” already tried to kill him. Pure speculation, but I would imagine when that failed, “they” also found people close to him to deliver “messaging” through. Same for Bongino and his 180, and others. It wasn’t Iran, and it wasn’t some nerd outsmarting and tactically outmaneuvering Secret Service with a glaring gap in an unsecured roof less than 200 yards from Trump. Accidents like that don’t happen.

“I’m less than a year into Groyper awareness myself, which began when the “uniparty” wanted us to believe that the guy who killed Kirk was a Groyper who didn’t think Kirk was Groyper enough.

post by Njord 1 hour ago

Njord

[]( “Load parent post”)

1h

My personal take is that Trump is not part of the “uni-party” or “industrial - military complex” intentionally. But he is playing a game inside of a board he didn’t write the rules I’m less than a year into Groyper awareness myself, which began when the “uniparty” wanted us to believe that the guy who killed Kirk was a Groyper who didn’t think Kirk was Groyper enough.

post by Njord 1 hour ago

Njord

[]( “Load parent post”)

1h

My personal take is that Trump is not part of the “uni-party” or “industrial - military complex” intentionally. But he is playing a game inside of a board he didn’t write the rules for. And from a higher level view, the board game authors and monitors are the interesting tidbit. game authors and monitors are the interesting tidbit.”

I’ve read a few Chomsky books over 20 years ago and he was, like most leftists, a good critic and he had a lot of insight about American hegemony. IIRC, he was making the case that Russia was the ultimate prize in the grand game.

The Cheneys’ opposition to Trump was a good clue that he was not a member of the uniparty, along with everything else we’ve experienced in the last decade.

Back to Groypers, I watched this Nick Fuentes clip and he’s now openly calling for people to vote for Democrats. What a pathetic little weirdo, but he sadly has many people who think he’s some political Nostradamus.

Interestingly, Chomsky’s early influence was via radical Judaism - to include hardline communism and Trotskyism. He later eschewed his Bolshevik inspired roots for more of a leftist leaning “by the people” form of Jewish communism vs a communist proletariat class, of sorts. But, maybe not so ironically in context of his quotes, he came up from Trotsky style of thinking, tracing directly back to Bolshevism and a split we still see and are at war with today. If there is a “divide and conquer” playbook, it’s here and mediated by the banking system as everything else exists as a stem, or root (see what I did there??) from it. @punnyguy The question then, is who is the seesaw fulcrum? Was Khamenei that globally influential? No. But AIPAC and Epstein are/were.

I really don’t follow this guy. After searching him he wound up in my algorithm for a bit and struck me as a top line influencer making shallow comments around an underlying current. Some people are good at capturing flow. And I’m sure he is an asset for somebody. Even if he didn’t set out to be one.

2 Likes

Also, @punnyguy

Not my intent to have a snarky spat but considering messaging above, it may be worth recalibrating optics. The lines aren’t as hard as they seem. Ideology is the sales pitch, money flow is the real goal.

I’ve never really taken a deep dive into Chomsky other than the books I read in my early 20’s. I had mostly written him off a long time ago but it is interesting that you say he was a Trotskyist. One of the accounts I find particularly credible on X (Yuri Bezmenov’s Ghost) makes the case that neoconservatism also grew out of Trotskyism.

1 Like

A good jumping off point to look in to conspiratorial corners of Ashkenazi theories. All unfounded, of course.

The frustration seems similar to what we used to have in NY. If I vote for Republicans and the outcome is the same, why vote? Luckily for NYers we still had/have States to flee to.

I still think Trump is 100x better than a Kamala administration (not to mention he’s way funnier). It is however frustrating to see things that were campaigned on in 16 still no closer to being realized. When Republicans have complete control, they seem to just pause every crazy thing the Democrats want for a few years. Which is good, but never a sense of urgency to deconstruct and fix. We never repealed Obamacare, there is no wall, still printing money, no mass deportations, still getting involved in new wars. To the common man, the results look the same. It gets demoralizing and people give up.

I’m not always trying to be a downer, but I see why Fuentes resonates with people in a similar way that Trump did in 2016. He’s vocalizing their frustration, not providing solutions.

3 Likes

I think this is a very important note.

I’ve decided not to say too much about US domestic politics any more, and focusing more on the foreign policy/international stuff, but this is fairly common thing that politicians do. And Trump has managed to channel the frustration very succesfully.

1 Like

It is, but now the mask is completely off. Fuentes is now using his moderate influence to directly undermine MAGA as a movement and encourage his followers to vote for Democrats because Trump isn’t governing as Adolf Hitler would have. That’s not hyperbole, either.

Fuentes is doing a lot more than vocalizing frustrations. He’s making a lot of money by being a critic operating under an inherently national socialist worldview, with the only key difference being that his in-group includes people like him and not just ethnic Germans. He’s a very bright guy, which makes the waste of potential even more tragic.

One of the reasons I post about local politics so much here in the Trump thread is because that’s where any one of us can actually move the needle, and I believe local politics shapes state and federal just as much as it does in the opposite direction. If he was a genuine patriot and actually America First, he would be emphasizing the importance of engaging with the political process at all times and especially at the local level.

We just lost a special election for my state representative to the worst city councilor Lewiston has. He will simultaneously be serving on the school board, the city council, and in the state legislature for the next 8 months or so. A smoking hot blonde ran and lost against him as an open MAGA Republican, but she made it a close race. The real problem is the 20 percent turnout, where many people have gotten the same message Nick Fuentes is communicating. They just don’t show up to vote when it matters, even though it only takes a few minutes here in Lewiston.

1 Like

Always the most important and always the most overlooked.

1 Like

Back to Trump stuff, we hacked all kinds of Iranian media, including smartphone prayer apps and their state television feed.

The jury is still out on whether or not this actually produces a better future for Persians, but it sure is different than what’s been attempted before.

1 Like

Can’t say he didn’t told them so. :man_shrugging:t2:.

Lets see if it works.

1 Like

According to Trump, regime change is not a goal. Hopefully it happens anyway and they are obviously trying to do it by encouraging an uprising. This seems like a clear message from Trump that he’s probably not going to commit an army of boots on the ground to do Iraq or Afghanistan all over again.

We all get to learn if that’s true or not together.

1 Like

I am all for a semiannual bombing until Iran gets the message. Regime change doesn’t need to be the goal, it will become the solution.

1 Like