Tren Ace 2 Weeker

[quote]PAINTRAINDave wrote:
Contact your UGL? I thought the UK was the candy-land of juice, apparently I was misinformed. :slight_smile:

If you’ve never run Test USP before you really should, I feel it does more of what people say Tren does, than Tren itself, in terms of lean mass and aggression, without the insane sides.

Also pinning once a day is fine with suspension, I didn’t get the ‘missed a shot’ feeling that you get if you miss a Tren A or Test P inject.

GL,
-PTD [/quote]

Haha slightly misinformed yes, although the UK had an abundance of gear floating around suspension is hard to come by. Nevertheless I will ask my guy, interested now that you say it has similar effects to Tren.

Cheers,
SB

[quote]Singhbuilder wrote:
Im not quite sure where you read/heard that hCG will suppress LH production at the pituitary. If you could outline the mechanism by which hCG directly suppresses LH production it will be informative to me.[/quote]

It suppresses LH production because it “is” LH inside the male body.

Hypothalamus - GnRH
Pituitary - LH <—
Testes - Endogenous Test

So that’s the HPTA above. Note how exogenous LH admin (see arrow) has downstream effects in the testes, and also “tells” the upstream master gland to slow down its endogenous LH production.

[quote]chillain wrote:

[quote]Singhbuilder wrote:
Im not quite sure where you read/heard that hCG will suppress LH production at the pituitary. If you could outline the mechanism by which hCG directly suppresses LH production it will be informative to me.[/quote]

It suppresses LH production because it “is” LH inside the male body.

Hypothalamus - GnRH
Pituitary - LH <—
Testes - Endogenous Test

So that’s the HPTA above. Note how exogenous LH admin (see arrow) has downstream effects in the testes, and also “tells” the upstream master gland to slow down its endogenous LH production.

[/quote]

This upstream ‘master gland’ being the pituitary? My theory was based on the fact that the body does not recognise hCG as its own LH, thats why LH would not be suppressed. But fair enough, maybe it does.

SB

are you still going to run this cycle? I’d be interested to hear how you get on

I might wait till I got my exams out the way, I cant be dealing with any depression or brain fog. I will update this thread though regularly when I use, or if there are any questions etc.

SB

[quote]PAINTRAINDave wrote:
Contact your UGL? I thought the UK was the candy-land of juice, apparently I was misinformed. :slight_smile:

GL,
-PTD [/quote]

i know some sources say they are from UK but definitely are not
 lol. i know this for a fact.

[quote]VTBalla34 wrote:

[quote]Singhbuilder wrote:

[quote]BigSkwatta wrote:

Suppressing your pituitary from releasing LH by taking hcg while taking clomid and nolva to stimulate your pituitary to release LH makes no sense though. Hcg has an active life of what, 64 hours I think, if I remember correctly
 So you should either move the hcg to day 13 and start PCT on day 16, if you insist on doing the hcg on day 16, you might as well wait until day 19 to start the nolva and clomid


I have never heard of atrophy in a day or two. That is very odd to me. I really wouldn’t normally think hcg is needed for a 2 weeker, but if it is what you feel comfortable doing then who am I to tell you otherwise.

As for the mast, that may be more by the individual. Not sure if you have personal experience with mast but one of the guys I train with has comparable results from mast and tren, just less sides and has to pay a little more for mast, although he seems to respond well to any DHT based compound. Personally I gain very little muscle from tren, but lose fat and get stronger.

Whether you decide to take everyone’s advice or not good luck.
[/quote]

Im not quite sure where you read/heard that hCG will suppress LH production at the pituitary. If you could outline the mechanism by which hCG directly suppresses LH production it will be informative to me.
I think you may be confusing the LH suppression by OESTROGEN produced from the use of hCG, not hCG directly.
The hCG will cause testosterone production, which can aromatise and result in oestrogen suppressing the pituitary from releasing LH.
In which case I believe such a small dose will not cause significant increase in testicular aromatase thus the resulting elevated oestrogen.

However I understand the point you are trying to make so I will wait a couple of days between my last hCG pin and commencement of SERM.
I have used mast before, I like the hard look it gives to the muscle but cannot compare it to the anabolic effects of Tren.

SB[/quote]

HCG will absolutely suppress LH production by way of feedback from the testoterone production it causes. Your body sees it has adequate testosterone production (caused by hcg) and shuts down LH production to compensate. This is basic.
[/quote]

I’m not flaming here but I can tell you from experience, bloodwork and some literature if I can dig it up that dosing HCG for UP TO ONE MONTH AT 300IU PER DAY PRODUCES LITTLE NEGATIVE FEEDBACK ON THE HPTA. Any supression compared to AAS is absolutely minimal, ideally you want to finish the HCG just as the AAS clears your system but it isn’t going to hurt going over.

I would run test and tren only, and I’d go for a gram a week of tren with about 150mg of test, thats all you’ll need. If you’re worried about prop pain remember you’ll be injecting small volumes and if you mix it up with the tren it should hardly hurt at all. And test suspension is NOTHING like tren. It’s great stuff but it really doesn’t compare in any way. Your cycle will feel a lot better with test in there.

[quote]Singhbuilder wrote:
Ive done abit of reading and the general consensus is that Tren should be avoided in 2-weekers. The point of a two-week cycle is to avoid suppression and Tren being highly suppressive will be counter-productive.

Any thoughts on this?

SB[/quote]

Bill Roberts recommends it for two week cycles pretty regularly as far as I know

[quote]MassiveGuns wrote:

[quote]VTBalla34 wrote:

[quote]Singhbuilder wrote:

[quote]BigSkwatta wrote:

Suppressing your pituitary from releasing LH by taking hcg while taking clomid and nolva to stimulate your pituitary to release LH makes no sense though. Hcg has an active life of what, 64 hours I think, if I remember correctly
 So you should either move the hcg to day 13 and start PCT on day 16, if you insist on doing the hcg on day 16, you might as well wait until day 19 to start the nolva and clomid


I have never heard of atrophy in a day or two. That is very odd to me. I really wouldn’t normally think hcg is needed for a 2 weeker, but if it is what you feel comfortable doing then who am I to tell you otherwise.

As for the mast, that may be more by the individual. Not sure if you have personal experience with mast but one of the guys I train with has comparable results from mast and tren, just less sides and has to pay a little more for mast, although he seems to respond well to any DHT based compound. Personally I gain very little muscle from tren, but lose fat and get stronger.

Whether you decide to take everyone’s advice or not good luck.
[/quote]

Im not quite sure where you read/heard that hCG will suppress LH production at the pituitary. If you could outline the mechanism by which hCG directly suppresses LH production it will be informative to me.
I think you may be confusing the LH suppression by OESTROGEN produced from the use of hCG, not hCG directly.
The hCG will cause testosterone production, which can aromatise and result in oestrogen suppressing the pituitary from releasing LH.
In which case I believe such a small dose will not cause significant increase in testicular aromatase thus the resulting elevated oestrogen.

However I understand the point you are trying to make so I will wait a couple of days between my last hCG pin and commencement of SERM.
I have used mast before, I like the hard look it gives to the muscle but cannot compare it to the anabolic effects of Tren.

SB[/quote]

HCG will absolutely suppress LH production by way of feedback from the testoterone production it causes. Your body sees it has adequate testosterone production (caused by hcg) and shuts down LH production to compensate. This is basic.
[/quote]

I’m not flaming here but I can tell you from experience, bloodwork and some literature if I can dig it up that dosing HCG for UP TO ONE MONTH AT 300IU PER DAY PRODUCES LITTLE NEGATIVE FEEDBACK ON THE HPTA. Any supression compared to AAS is absolutely minimal, ideally you want to finish the HCG just as the AAS clears your system but it isn’t going to hurt going over.

I would run test and tren only, and I’d go for a gram a week of tren with about 150mg of test, thats all you’ll need. If you’re worried about prop pain remember you’ll be injecting small volumes and if you mix it up with the tren it should hardly hurt at all. And test suspension is NOTHING like tren. It’s great stuff but it really doesn’t compare in any way. Your cycle will feel a lot better with test in there.
[/quote]

This is also my stance in regards to low-dose hCG useage. I think the suppression from hCG is slightly over-rated, however I do agree that with higher blasts it may be a cause for concern.
This is good news to me, I wanted to use Tren but I thought it might suppress me too much and I might be shutdown again for a year. So my cycle would become 2 weeks on/1 year off, 2 weeks on/1 year off LOL JK.

Gram of Tren, wow that would completely warp me physique wise even with higher levels of development. I have never used high amounts of AAS, max I’ve used of Tren was 350mg/wk and my gains were STUPID to say the least, near enough a pound of muscle a day all while retaining my 28inch waist.

SB

[quote]Explosiv wrote:

[quote]Singhbuilder wrote:
Ive done abit of reading and the general consensus is that Tren should be avoided in 2-weekers. The point of a two-week cycle is to avoid suppression and Tren being highly suppressive will be counter-productive.

Any thoughts on this?

SB[/quote]

Bill Roberts recommends it for two week cycles pretty regularly as far as I know[/quote]

Yep I’m aware of this. However Bill Roberts did also say that Tren will not produce any prolactin-related sides, but in my case it actually did the opposite.
His theory is that if Tren causes prolactin related sides, its not truely Tren. I think I remember Cortes having a debate with him about this some time ago.

SB

[quote]Singhbuilder wrote:

[quote]Explosiv wrote:

[quote]Singhbuilder wrote:
Ive done abit of reading and the general consensus is that Tren should be avoided in 2-weekers. The point of a two-week cycle is to avoid suppression and Tren being highly suppressive will be counter-productive.

Any thoughts on this?

SB[/quote]

Bill Roberts recommends it for two week cycles pretty regularly as far as I know[/quote]

Yep I’m aware of this. However Bill Roberts did also say that Tren will not produce any prolactin-related sides, but in my case it actually did the opposite.
His theory is that if Tren causes prolactin related sides, its not truely Tren. I think I remember Cortes having a debate with him about this some time ago.

SB[/quote]

Honestly, I would venture to say that he is right and you’re just not getting real tren.

I guess one could question his integrity, but considering the fact that he has said he gave consultations to hundreds of athletes and none had that problem, then one has to take into account the legitimacy of the tren they are using.

By prolactin sides, do you mean lactating from the nipple? Or was it gyno (could have been induced from test aromatization from your testosterone (or dbol) base and not using enough AI). Not really trying to question the legitimacy of your claim, but BR seems to have a pretty strong grasp of the topic from what I’ve gathered from reading.

Do you get yours from a source or make it from finaplix-h?

Yes lactation, erectile dysfunction and no sex drive. Also have blood test results to prove the raised prolactin.

I get mine for a trusted source, I must say the Tren exhibits the usual qualities of reported so I have a hard time questioning the legitamacy.

SB