[quote]Professor X wrote:
You are just cussing poorly on a site where there seems to be a group of people here to ONLY fuss with me personally instead of allow an actual discussion between us.
[/quote]
we think highly of our self, dont we?
[quote]Professor X wrote:
You are just cussing poorly on a site where there seems to be a group of people here to ONLY fuss with me personally instead of allow an actual discussion between us.
[/quote]
we think highly of our self, dont we?
[quote]Jewbacca wrote:
[quote]thehebrewhero wrote:
[quote]Jewbacca wrote:
[quote]thehebrewhero wrote:
[quote]Sloth wrote:
George Zimmerman, who has been in hiding since he was acquitted of murder in the death of Trayvon Martin, emerged to help rescue someone who was trapped in an overturned truck, police said today.
Looks like a PR stunt… Im sure between hidding for his life he found the time… Please tell me it was black dude.
Next week he will broker a deal between the bloods & crips, negotiates the Paquioa Mayweather deal, and bring peace to the middle east.[/quote]
Your kind of stupidity is not good for the Jews.[/quote]
Neither is pandering to the here comes honey boo boo crowd that has historically been a equal oportunity offender when it comes to race, ethnicity, and sexual orientation. Remeber the majority followed hitler as well
[/quote]
I stongly recommend against aliyah for you.
You’d find too many of what you would call “honey boo boo” Jews in my home for your liberal sensibilities.[/quote]
haha well then I must have snuck one past the goaly becuase I have been to the promiss land
I have many relatives in Tel Aviv nice beachs sexy women good hash… I take it you are a sabra not a import… I can understand your view now… things are different hear we dont have entire boardering nations trying to kill us… Here comes honey boo boo is realty TV show here rednecks and WASPy peabrains love… Aka the same folks that dont like Jews
X, since we don’t understand the sagging pants mentality, can you kindly explain it? I’m being completely serious. When I had lost a bunch of weight in college due to lower quality in food, I often had a big sagging pants issue and would find it funny to walk around with my pants incredibly low. Its very difficult to walk like that, restricting - rather than freeing - and uncomfortable.
I also would ask that since the bulk of the White community does not understand these fashion trends - regardless of where they came from - is any effort being made by the Black community to help “us” understand? From what I’ve seen folks just go on doing their thing and intentionally withdraw into their own groups - the ones that sag their pants anyways. They speak a dialect that is hard to understand (ebonics) - also exclusive and shunning - and have no issues calling White people crackers -which I just found out meant whip cracker, not like white, saltine cracker. Learn something new every day.
I still recall going into the 'burg for some play in Junior High and being one of the few schools with majority white students. I don’t remember how many times I heard our group called “stupid, crazy crackers” by those around us. Can we admit at least that Black people are just as (if not moreso) racist than White people? Again, speaking in generalities since I truly hope that there are as many Black people who like and are accepting of White people as there is vice versa - percentage wise seeing as the Black community is a minority.
[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]DBCooper wrote:
Professor X:
You asked how I knew that blacks committed so many more crimes than whites. No one is arguing that crime statistics reflect every crime ever committed, so I fully agree that they do not represent the actual amount of crimes being committed. [/quote]
Then that questions why I was attacked by the usual posters for saying this…but as we can see, that seems to be the trend on this board lately.
[quote]
However, how do you know that the actual vs. the perceived is significantly different, huh?[/quote]
I would lend that towards common sense. There is no possible way that ALL crime that occurs is even reported let alone prosecuted…not to mention the fact that NON VIOLENT CRIMES are still crimes and much less likely to be reported.
Given that, we know without a doubt that the number of crimes reported or prosecuted represent only a PERCENTAGE of all crimes ever committed.
[quote]
You demand me to provide answers yet you haven’t answered one thing I’ve asked in anything close to a satisfactory manner. How do we know that crime statistics are only scratching the surface? How do we know that the reality is that even MORE blacks are committing crimes than statistics reflect?[/quote]
It doesn’t matter if they “scratch the surface” or not. The point is, not all crimes are even reported so there is no way you can say that “blacks commit most crimes”.
Blacks are profiled for crimes more which will increase those arrested and prosecuted in itself alone.
I’m all for discussions. I love them. I’m still waiting to have one with you, though.
Let’s get back to this crime statistic thing. I already acknowledged that crime statistics only reflect arrests, convictions, reported crimes, etc., etc. Are you arguing that there is a disparity between reported crimes and committed crimes that significantly alters the statistical trend? Do you really believe that? Do you realize that since blacks make up a small percentage of the overall population that they should make up a small percentage of the crime statistics as well? And do you realize that for blacks to make up even HALF of the crime statistics, which would still represent a serious skew in the wrong direction for them, there would have to be something like 9 times as many whites actually committing crimes than blacks. For the statistics to be representative of the population demographics there would have to be several times more crimes than that being committed by whites than blacks.
So, are you basing your argument on the assumption that there is this significant of a difference in crimes committed versus crimes reported and accounted for in statistical measurements?
You ask me how I know that statistics represent all crimes. I never said that they do, you simply jumped to that conclusion on your own. Only an idiot would be stupid enough to think that I was making that argument.
cough
AND
â??There is nothing more painful to me at this stage in my life than to walk down the street and hear footsteps and start thinking about robbery. Then look around and see somebody white and feel relieved… After all we have been through. Just to think we can’t walk down our own streets, how humiliating.â?? --Jesse Jackson 3/10/96
[quote]Quasi-Tech wrote:
cough[/quote]
I was really, really hoping no one posted this story.
It is very hard to read.
I just don’t know what kind of depraved, twisted mind it takes to pull the trigger on a toddler.
This isn’t “fair” in my opinion. This isn’t really “black on white” crime in the sense we have been talking about. This is monster on human crime. The person who pulled that trigger is a monster plain and simple.
Oh, I know its not a race crime… its delinquent individuals acting out and punishing their victim as severely as they can. I’m not saying Blacks are evil here.
I AM saying that if this was white dudes doing this it would be a hate crime. That this isn’t getting any publicity because its black on white. That this is a strong point for the fact that there is indeed racism, and its to cover the poor acts of bad people that happen to be Black, while placing similar acts in the limelight for stupid people who happened to have SOME White.
It is in fact a Black and White crime if we hold it to the same standards others have held the Zimmerman/Martin case. It’s also a hate crime by that same definition. I mean they obviously profiled her because she was by herself with a child and was an easy victim.
Its not truly about race here, I’d bet they would do similar to a Black woman, it was about the money - although killing the child does show hate for someone innocent.
We’ll see how the media plays this one. What’s Obama’s response? Especially with his recent, “we need to uplift the young Black males of America.” It also shows a prime example of the statistics people have been posting.
I’m excitedly waiting for “she shouldn’t have been there,” or “well stuff happens,” or “obviously shooting the child - one of the youngest recorded murders ever - was by accident and not intentional.”
[quote]waldo21212 wrote:
Dave Chapelle on how you dress:
[/quote]
Son of a bitch i posted this like 3 days ago and T-Nation censored it for some reason.
Who’s knob you polish?
[quote]DBCooper wrote:
[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]DBCooper wrote:
Professor X:
You asked how I knew that blacks committed so many more crimes than whites. No one is arguing that crime statistics reflect every crime ever committed, so I fully agree that they do not represent the actual amount of crimes being committed. [/quote]
Then that questions why I was attacked by the usual posters for saying this…but as we can see, that seems to be the trend on this board lately.
[quote]
However, how do you know that the actual vs. the perceived is significantly different, huh?[/quote]
I would lend that towards common sense. There is no possible way that ALL crime that occurs is even reported let alone prosecuted…not to mention the fact that NON VIOLENT CRIMES are still crimes and much less likely to be reported.
Given that, we know without a doubt that the number of crimes reported or prosecuted represent only a PERCENTAGE of all crimes ever committed.
[quote]
You demand me to provide answers yet you haven’t answered one thing I’ve asked in anything close to a satisfactory manner. How do we know that crime statistics are only scratching the surface? How do we know that the reality is that even MORE blacks are committing crimes than statistics reflect?[/quote]
It doesn’t matter if they “scratch the surface” or not. The point is, not all crimes are even reported so there is no way you can say that “blacks commit most crimes”.
Blacks are profiled for crimes more which will increase those arrested and prosecuted in itself alone.
I’m all for discussions. I love them. I’m still waiting to have one with you, though.
Let’s get back to this crime statistic thing. I already acknowledged that crime statistics only reflect arrests, convictions, reported crimes, etc., etc. Are you arguing that there is a disparity between reported crimes and committed crimes that significantly alters the statistical trend? Do you really believe that? Do you realize that since blacks make up a small percentage of the overall population that they should make up a small percentage of the crime statistics as well? And do you realize that for blacks to make up even HALF of the crime statistics, which would still represent a serious skew in the wrong direction for them, there would have to be something like 9 times as many whites actually committing crimes than blacks. For the statistics to be representative of the population demographics there would have to be several times more crimes than that being committed by whites than blacks.
So, are you basing your argument on the assumption that there is this significant of a difference in crimes committed versus crimes reported and accounted for in statistical measurements?
You ask me how I know that statistics represent all crimes. I never said that they do, you simply jumped to that conclusion on your own. Only an idiot would be stupid enough to think that I was making that argument. [/quote]
14000 reports of black men on white women sexual assault, 0 cases of white men on black women sexual assaults. Clearly 14000 white men got away with it.
[quote]Quasi-Tech wrote:
http://rense.com/general82/ana.htm
cough[/quote]
Thats profiling.
Bill Cosby’s a godam racist.
[quote]audiogarden1 wrote:
[quote]Quasi-Tech wrote:
http://rense.com/general82/ana.htm
cough[/quote]
Thats profiling.
Bill Cosby’s a godam racist.[/quote]
Yeah hes a racis’ ass fo sho.
But I will say a lot of times I can’t understand a single word of what some people say their English is so terrible and ebonics’d up. I try my best as not to be rude, but I just can’t…
http://news.yahoo.com/black-americas-real-problem-isnt-white-racism-070000529.html
Yay, more racist statistics and information.
[quote]Quasi-Tech wrote:
http://news.yahoo.com/black-americas-real-problem-isnt-white-racism-070000529.html
Yay, more racist statistics and information. [/quote]
I really just was so shocked and upset while reading through that. I’m not going to take part in the blame game going on in here, but I will say that I just cannot understand how X and some others are still trying to argue that racism is, in large part, a white institution. Really? Fourteen THOUSAND cases of black on white rape and NOT ONE case of white on black rape. It blows my mind. Like SmashingWeights, I believe, said: Does X and crew really think that 14,000 or more white people got away with rape to skew those statistics?
[quote]Bauber wrote:
[quote]audiogarden1 wrote:
[quote]Quasi-Tech wrote:
http://rense.com/general82/ana.htm
cough[/quote]
Thats profiling.
Bill Cosby’s a godam racist.[/quote]
Yeah hes a racis’ ass fo sho.
But I will say a lot of times I can’t understand a single word of what some people say their English is so terrible and ebonics’d up. I try my best as not to be rude, but I just can’t…[/quote]
Im still not sure what “finna” means…
[quote]J. Prufrock wrote:
[quote]Quasi-Tech wrote:
http://news.yahoo.com/black-americas-real-problem-isnt-white-racism-070000529.html
Yay, more racist statistics and information. [/quote]
I really just was so shocked and upset while reading through that. I’m not going to take part in the blame game going on in here, but I will say that I just cannot understand how X and some others are still trying to argue that racism is, in large part, a white institution. Really? Fourteen THOUSAND cases of black on white rape and NOT ONE case of white on black rape. It blows my mind. Like SmashingWeights, I believe, said: Does X and crew really think that 14,000 or more white people got away with rape to skew those statistics?
[/quote]
It will be rationalized and down-played somehow.
They’ll say “White people are so racist, they find black women so repulsive they wont even rape 'em!”
This was on O’Riley last night. Say whatever you want about him and Foxnews but the statistic of 73% of new black children born out of wedlock and what he says about where the blame lies on how to correct it is very spot on. Maybe the best comentary I have heard on this topic in a while.
[quote]Da Man reloaded wrote:
[quote]Testy1 wrote:
many of the stereotypes are dead on[/quote]
WHAT!?!?!
hasnt your and others previous 76 pages of posts been refuting that?[/quote]
context counts
Those statistics are shocking to anyone who really doesn’t realize just how things break down. You read that write up and even the wonderful piece (IMO) that Cosby authored a few years back (and I believe was met with a huge backlash), and you see the difference between people who focus on what they can do in the present for the future, and those who prefer to always scapegoat others, or as seems to be common, the past.
I’m certainly no expert on race relations (if that is indeed the proper term for what is being discussed), but I can say from my experience
working in the NYC education system, that it isn’t uncommon to see populations appearing full on resistant to doing anything that could improve their situations, instead opting to complain, and blame. (Damn, I’m sure that statement will blow back on me, but it’s simply based on my own experiences, which no one can dispute… unless of course I must be racist! -lol)
S