Transgender Priest

Off Topic Politics & World Issues
141

[quote]smh_23 wrote:

[quote]SexMachine wrote:

[quote]smh_23 wrote:

[quote]SexMachine wrote:

However as I stated above, Obama adopted Bell’s Critical Race Theory and taught it to his own students. Obama also participated in efforts to bully Harvard into adopting race quotas to increase the number of black faculty members. This radical racist ideology is reflected in Obama’s policy and manifests itself through such initiatives as “My Brother’s Keeper” (whites need not apply) and “my (imaginary) son could’ve looked like Trayvon.”[/quote]

But this has exactly nothing to do with the substance of my post or the facts of the case.

[/quote]

The accusation that Obama praised Farrakhan is in essence an accusation that Obama is a black supremacist - an accusation that is true. Thus, despite the erroneous quote and the false association, the substance of the accusation is factual.[/quote]

In the context of the meme, the accusation was one of homophobia. I doubt he’s a homophobe. Wasn’t he supposed to have sucked a dick or something?[/quote]

:-). I don’t believe any of that Obama is gay stuff. It’s possible, but I don’t see too much evidence to support it. And I’m sure Obama is not an anti-gay bigot either. His ideology is typical of the new left - he will always side with the perceived victim group. The victims are always minorities and the perpetrators always evil, white, heterosexual men with guns and bibles.

142

[quote]NorCal916 wrote:

[quote]Bismark wrote:

[quote]SexMachine wrote:

[quote]smh_23 wrote:

[quote]sufiandy wrote:

[quote]NorCal916 wrote:
See, what they ghey mafia does not understand with the increase of Hispanics and Muslims, they ain’t gonna stand for dis shit. [/quote]
[/quote]

I agree with the sentiment, but Obama never came remotely close to calling Farrakhan a hero.[/quote]

Obama’s Professor Derrick Bell did. A man is known by the company he keeps.[/quote]

Yes, because we adopt every belief our professors hold. Even if he was close to this professor, who cares? A student can be close to an instructor while disagreeing with them vehemently. I know I was/am.
[/quote]

I bet the media would have cared if Bush would have had the same association with lets say… David Duke? Do you think they would have cared?

Me thinks so. They woulda been outraged.[/quote]

As much as I disagree with him on some respects, Derrick Bell does not equal David Duke. Who cares what professor’s class you enrolled in? It doesn’t equal a dissertation of the same.

143

[quote]SexMachine wrote:

[quote]smh_23 wrote:

[quote]SexMachine wrote:

[quote]smh_23 wrote:

[quote]SexMachine wrote:

However as I stated above, Obama adopted Bell’s Critical Race Theory and taught it to his own students. Obama also participated in efforts to bully Harvard into adopting race quotas to increase the number of black faculty members. This radical racist ideology is reflected in Obama’s policy and manifests itself through such initiatives as “My Brother’s Keeper” (whites need not apply) and “my (imaginary) son could’ve looked like Trayvon.”[/quote]

But this has exactly nothing to do with the substance of my post or the facts of the case.

[/quote]

The accusation that Obama praised Farrakhan is in essence an accusation that Obama is a black supremacist - an accusation that is true. Thus, despite the erroneous quote and the false association, the substance of the accusation is factual.[/quote]

In the context of the meme, the accusation was one of homophobia. I doubt he’s a homophobe. Wasn’t he supposed to have sucked a dick or something?[/quote]

:-). I don’t believe any of that Obama is gay stuff. It’s possible, but I don’t see too much evidence to support it. And I’m sure Obama is not an anti-gay bigot either. His ideology is typical of the new left - he will always side with the perceived victim group. The victims are always minorities and the perpetrators always evil, white, heterosexual men with guns and bibles.
[/quote]

As a humorous aside: If I’m not mistaken, the gay accuser held a press conference in which his lawyer wore a kilt and explained that he needed the extra space for his enormous cock.

144

[quote]smh_23 wrote:

[quote]SexMachine wrote:

[quote]smh_23 wrote:

[quote]SexMachine wrote:

[quote]smh_23 wrote:

[quote]SexMachine wrote:

However as I stated above, Obama adopted Bell’s Critical Race Theory and taught it to his own students. Obama also participated in efforts to bully Harvard into adopting race quotas to increase the number of black faculty members. This radical racist ideology is reflected in Obama’s policy and manifests itself through such initiatives as “My Brother’s Keeper” (whites need not apply) and “my (imaginary) son could’ve looked like Trayvon.”[/quote]

But this has exactly nothing to do with the substance of my post or the facts of the case.

[/quote]

The accusation that Obama praised Farrakhan is in essence an accusation that Obama is a black supremacist - an accusation that is true. Thus, despite the erroneous quote and the false association, the substance of the accusation is factual.[/quote]

In the context of the meme, the accusation was one of homophobia. I doubt he’s a homophobe. Wasn’t he supposed to have sucked a dick or something?[/quote]

:-). I don’t believe any of that Obama is gay stuff. It’s possible, but I don’t see too much evidence to support it. And I’m sure Obama is not an anti-gay bigot either. His ideology is typical of the new left - he will always side with the perceived victim group. The victims are always minorities and the perpetrators always evil, white, heterosexual men with guns and bibles.
[/quote]

As a humorous aside: If I’m not mistaken, the gay accuser held a press conference in which his lawyer wore a kilt and explained that he needed the extra space for his enormous cock.[/quote]

Yes!

145

It was pretty funny watching Larry Sinclair in a suit and tie earnestly relating how he “performed fellatio on Senator Obama” while he(Obama) smoked crack.

146

[quote]SexMachine wrote:
It was pretty funny watching Larry Sinclair in a suit and tie earnestly relating how he “performed fellatio on Senator Obama” while he(Obama) smoked crack.[/quote]

It’s called gay porn , probably with the tag of Bi Racial and Crack . Hope that helps with your obsession :slight_smile:

147

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]SexMachine wrote:
It was pretty funny watching Larry Sinclair in a suit and tie earnestly relating how he “performed fellatio on Senator Obama” while he(Obama) smoked crack.[/quote]

It’s called gay porn , probably with the tag of Bi Racial and Crack . Hope that helps with your obsession :slight_smile:
[/quote]

Thanks. If I ever need an emetic I’ll give that a try.

148

[quote]Bismark wrote:

Yes!

[/quote]

Hahaha yes! I had no idea that this had been caught on camera. Gold.

149

For anyone who buys into this cultural Marxist concept of “gender is in the mind,” I want you to think about my position on the subject. I firmly believe that it’s a serious question of medical ethics and that I hold a more humane view on the matter. I don’t hate transgender people; I genuinely feel sorry for them. I’ll try to illustrate my point with a recent news story on the subject:

A 49-year-old ABC News editor named Don Ennis showed up for work one day in a dress and a wig. He announced to everyone that he had suddenly realised that he was really a woman trapped in a man’s body. His new name was " Dawn" and of course everyone had to be co-opted into his mental illness or risk losing their job for discriminating against him. Don’s colleagues were required to pretend that he was sane and pretend that he was a woman.

Don’s physician also had to pretend he was sane and administer hormones to Don that caused him to grow breasts. But after a few months Don realised that he was wasn’t really a woman at all - in short, he experienced a remission of his mental illness.

“…as recently as last Friday, I felt I was indeed a woman, in my mind, body and soul…”

This is scientific fact right? A guy suddenly realises after 49 years that he’s really a woman then after a few months gender suddenly switches back and he realises he’s a man again - only now with a pair of tits thanks to his physician who didn’t accept that he was mentally ill.

“I am already using the men’s room and dressing accordingly,” he noted.

The issues of medical ethics here should be obvious. If this guy thought he was really a mermaid, is it appropriate for a physician to amputate his arms, sew his legs together, fashion his feet into a fin and wave goodbye as he tries to swim off into the sunset?

150

[quote]SexMachine wrote:
For anyone who buys into this cultural Marxist concept of “gender is in the mind,” I want you to think about my position on the subject. I firmly believe that it’s a serious question of medical ethics and that I hold a more humane view on the matter. I don’t hate transgender people; I genuinely feel sorry for them. I’ll try to illustrate my point with a recent news story on the subject:

A 49-year-old ABC News editor named Don Ennis showed up for work one day in a dress and a wig. He announced to everyone that he had suddenly realised that he was really a woman trapped in a man’s body. His new name was " Dawn" and of course everyone had to be co-opted into his mental illness or risk losing their job for discriminating against him. Don’s colleagues were required to pretend that he was sane and pretend that he was a woman.

Don’s physician also had to pretend he was sane and administer hormones to Don that caused him to grow breasts. But after a few months Don realised that he was wasn’t really a woman at all - in short, he experienced a remission of his mental illness.

“…as recently as last Friday, I felt I was indeed a woman, in my mind, body and soul…”

This is scientific fact right? A guy suddenly realises after 49 years that he’s really a woman then after a few months gender suddenly switches back and he realises he’s a man again - only now with a pair of tits thanks to his physician who didn’t accept that he was mentally ill.

“I am already using the men’s room and dressing accordingly,” he noted.

The issues of medical ethics here should be obvious. If this guy thought he was really a mermaid, is it appropriate for a physician to amputate his arms, sew his legs together, fashion his feet into a fin and wave goodbye as he tries to swim off into the sunset?[/quote]

As long as my tax dollars don’t pay for it, I don’t really give a shit.

151

[quote]angry chicken wrote:

[quote]SexMachine wrote:
For anyone who buys into this cultural Marxist concept of “gender is in the mind,” I want you to think about my position on the subject. I firmly believe that it’s a serious question of medical ethics and that I hold a more humane view on the matter. I don’t hate transgender people; I genuinely feel sorry for them. I’ll try to illustrate my point with a recent news story on the subject:

A 49-year-old ABC News editor named Don Ennis showed up for work one day in a dress and a wig. He announced to everyone that he had suddenly realised that he was really a woman trapped in a man’s body. His new name was " Dawn" and of course everyone had to be co-opted into his mental illness or risk losing their job for discriminating against him. Don’s colleagues were required to pretend that he was sane and pretend that he was a woman.

Don’s physician also had to pretend he was sane and administer hormones to Don that caused him to grow breasts. But after a few months Don realised that he was wasn’t really a woman at all - in short, he experienced a remission of his mental illness.

“…as recently as last Friday, I felt I was indeed a woman, in my mind, body and soul…”

This is scientific fact right? A guy suddenly realises after 49 years that he’s really a woman then after a few months gender suddenly switches back and he realises he’s a man again - only now with a pair of tits thanks to his physician who didn’t accept that he was mentally ill.

“I am already using the men’s room and dressing accordingly,” he noted.

The issues of medical ethics here should be obvious. If this guy thought he was really a mermaid, is it appropriate for a physician to amputate his arms, sew his legs together, fashion his feet into a fin and wave goodbye as he tries to swim off into the sunset?[/quote]

As long as my tax dollars don’t pay for it, I don’t really give a shit.
[/quote]

Firstly, your tax dollars are paying for this sort of shit. You’re paying for “diversity” training in schools, “sensitivity training” in the public sector, “discrimination” payouts to people who sue government departments and schools, radical civil rights lawyers in the DOJ etc.

Additionally, the Marxists are waging war on two fronts to undermine the state: the economic front and the cultural front. And they’re both connected.

152

[quote]H factor wrote:
Somewhere a God that doesn’t exist doesn’t give a shit.

Meanwhile here in end of the world PWI it will be a huge deal because we have a lot of people obsessed with those different from them. And who’s thoughts are dominated by those who are gay or transgendered thinking about it and talking about it far more than those gay and transgendered.

Hate on. Place has become far too predictable for my liking. [/quote]

There’s a reason PWI was created in the first place. To bury the crazies in the cellar, as it were. This used to be a forum where one could actually learn things. It’s healthy to step outside one’s echo chamber. But these days it’s basically freepublic.com, sadly.

153

[quote]Carl_ wrote:

[quote]H factor wrote:
Somewhere a God that doesn’t exist doesn’t give a shit.

Meanwhile here in end of the world PWI it will be a huge deal because we have a lot of people obsessed with those different from them. And who’s thoughts are dominated by those who are gay or transgendered thinking about it and talking about it far more than those gay and transgendered.

Hate on. Place has become far too predictable for my liking. [/quote]

There’s a reason PWI was created in the first place. To bury the crazies in the cellar, as it were. This used to be a forum where one could actually learn things. It’s healthy to step outside one’s echo chamber. But these days it’s basically freepublic.com, sadly.
[/quote]

Yes, people who don’t buy into this stuff are “crazies.” After all it’s science isn’t it? I mean science has proved that some people are born into the wrong body. Every single cell in their body may have two X chromosomes but their “spirit” is really female. It’s true. Science has proved the existence of “spirits” that reside somewhere inside our bodies. I know the ignorant “crazies” believe that the scientific method involves things like “evidence” and “reproducible results” and so on but people who say that are just haters.

Anyway, I know how progressive you Scandinavians are. I’m sure being a eunuch and cross dressing is totally normal where you come from but some of us ignorant “crazies” are still resistant to change. I’m trying, I really am but I’m just too ignorant to understand the “science” of “gender studies.”

154

[quote]SexMachine wrote:

Yes, people who don’t buy into this stuff are “crazies.” After all it’s science isn’t it? I mean science has proved that some people are born into the wrong body. Every single cell in their body may have two X chromosomes but their “spirit” is really female. It’s true. Science has proved the existence of “spirits” that reside somewhere inside our bodies. I know the ignorant “crazies” believe that the scientific method involves things like “evidence” and “reproducible results” and so on but people who say that are just haters.

Anyway, I know how progressive you Scandinavians are. I’m sure being a eunuch and cross dressing is totally normal where you come from but some of us ignorant “crazies” are still resistant to change. I’m trying, I really am but I’m just too ignorant to understand the “science” of “gender studies.”[/quote]

I’m under the impression that science does not refer to spirits. It’s about brains, female and male brains have their diffrences. Just like it’s possible to have a pair of eyes that don’t work together because one is from mothers side and the other from fathers. This causes all kind of problems, especially with depth vision. So it’s scientifically plausible to have a female brain in male body and vise versa. Now, if an opration can remove the problems this causes for the individual is open to debate, but the problem is real.

155

A little irony “many communists, especially in recent times, have argued that Gay Liberation is a key issue according to Marxism.” :slight_smile:

156

[quote]kaaleppi wrote:

I’m under the impression that science does not refer to spirits.
[/quote]

Gender studies does.

I know. Every single brain cell has either an X and a Y chromosome or an X and an X chromosome.

That’s a far cry from being “trapped in the wrong body.”

[quote]

So it’s scientifically plausible to have a female brain in male body and vise versa. Now, if an opration can remove the problems this causes for the individual is open to debate, but the problem is real.[/quote]

Not buying it.

157

[quote]SexMachine wrote:

That’s a far cry from being “trapped in the wrong body.”

Not buying it.
[/quote]

Eyes and brains are organs, sex is a strongly differentiating trait. I don’t see any problem. And it doesn’t exclude psychological reasons.

158

[quote]kaaleppi wrote:

[quote]SexMachine wrote:

That’s a far cry from being “trapped in the wrong body.”

Not buying it.
[/quote]

Eyes and brains are organs, sex is a strongly differentiating trait. I don’t see any problem. And it doesn’t exclude psychological reasons.[/quote]

My point is that sex is determined by one’s chromosomes. Every single cell in a man’s body has an X and a Y chromosome. “Thinking” that you’re a woman doesn’t make you a woman. Go into any mental asylum and you’ll find people who think they’re Napoleon or Jesus.

159

[quote]SexMachine wrote:

[quote]kaaleppi wrote:

[quote]SexMachine wrote:

That’s a far cry from being “trapped in the wrong body.”

Not buying it.
[/quote]

Eyes and brains are organs, sex is a strongly differentiating trait. I don’t see any problem. And it doesn’t exclude psychological reasons.[/quote]

My point is that sex is determined by one’s chromosomes. Every single cell in a man’s body has an X and a Y chromosome. “Thinking” that you’re a woman doesn’t make you a woman. Go into any mental asylum and you’ll find people who think they’re Napoleon or Jesus.
[/quote]

Thinking is an integral part for sure. Without it no Napoleons, Jesuses or transgenders or whatever. No men or women either. You can be female or male, but doesn’t care. If you happen to be male you are happy to hump almost anything when aroused.

160

[quote]SexMachine wrote:

[quote]Carl_ wrote:

[quote]H factor wrote:
Somewhere a God that doesn’t exist doesn’t give a shit.

Meanwhile here in end of the world PWI it will be a huge deal because we have a lot of people obsessed with those different from them. And who’s thoughts are dominated by those who are gay or transgendered thinking about it and talking about it far more than those gay and transgendered.

Hate on. Place has become far too predictable for my liking. [/quote]

There’s a reason PWI was created in the first place. To bury the crazies in the cellar, as it were. This used to be a forum where one could actually learn things. It’s healthy to step outside one’s echo chamber. But these days it’s basically freepublic.com, sadly.
[/quote]

Yes, people who don’t buy into this stuff are “crazies.” After all it’s science isn’t it? I mean science has proved that some people are born into the wrong body. Every single cell in their body may have two X chromosomes but their “spirit” is really female. It’s true. Science has proved the existence of “spirits” that reside somewhere inside our bodies. I know the ignorant “crazies” believe that the scientific method involves things like “evidence” and “reproducible results” and so on but people who say that are just haters.

Anyway, I know how progressive you Scandinavians are. I’m sure being a eunuch and cross dressing is totally normal where you come from but some of us ignorant “crazies” are still resistant to change. I’m trying, I really am but I’m just too ignorant to understand the “science” of “gender studies.”[/quote]

Didn’t you say earlier it was a mental disorder? I think that diagnosis requires science. Is something only science when you agree with it?