[quote]VTBalla34 wrote:
[quote]Grneyes wrote:
Okay, does no one understand the costs in running a restaurant? Labor is already the largest part of the budget and that’s at $3.10 (I think is the current wage) an hour BEFORE tips. Servers tip out bussers, bartenders, cooks, expediters, etc. And don’t forget that some places take 10% of all credit card tips (for the cost of accepting credit cards) so the server is already getting gypped on tips.
There is no way a restaurant or bar could survive and make a profit if it had to pay a “living” wage without tips. The meal prices would skyrocket. [/quote]
Define “skyrocket”…you honestly think the price of meals would increase by more than the 20% (or whatever expected tips are)? How would you come to that conclusion???
I submit that I would end up paying LESS overall for my restaurant experience because I would no longer be making up for those deadbeats that do not tip…if an average tip is 10-15%, then my 20% or more “surcharge” on top of my bill would be reduced in half…
And again, I have addressed your phantom skyrocketing prices point in this thread already…there is already a society in which your assumption is disproven…its called THE REST OF THE WORLD…I pay comparable prices in Britain (in pounds) to what I would pay in America (in dollars) for the same restaurant experience (I used TGIFridays and a pub as two examples)…and hell, those British prices are with a nationwide 22% Value Added Tax…so somehow the prices are actually LOWER in these crazy socialist countries…weird how that works…
[/quote]
What is it with some of you circle jerking, wannabe econ majors?
Hey, Charles Schwab:
It’s not just the cost of food. It’s not just the cost of food RELATIVE to the per-capita salary. Running a pub in Britain may not be the same cost-wise as running the same in America, due to cost of utilities, state-mandated minimum wage, cost of LICENSES, etc.
You are neglecting the CULTURAL differences in consumer/diner expectation at a restaurant: Americans are used to more, so if restaurant A (competing with restaurants B-Z) is about to serve 1/3 (approx, but point is relevant) the food because it decided to pay its servers a “living wage,” guess what happens? That restaurant suffers a loss in traffic because diners won’t accept the 2/3 reduction in food quantity and will simply dine at another restaurant.
Or, it means that you and OG would have to cook each other dinner to avoid contributing to the $28/hr salary of these Motherfucking Servers ™