[quote]pushharder wrote:
[quote]OsakaNate wrote:
I’ll say it again, there is no way a server is worth $30 an hour. Period.
[/quote]
Sure he is. If the market is left alone and is willing to pay $30 an hour then the server IS worth it.
Now I don’t know for sure but I’ll bet you have no problem with the State of Montana dictating that a completely unskilled laborer who may still be in high school MUST be paid by me the $31.52 an hour I mentioned earlier.
http://svc.mt.gov/gsd/onestop/upload/heavyconstpw.pdf
So on the premise that you DO agree with minimum/prevailing wage standards that are ultimately enforced with the barrel of a gun I have to question why the goofy teenager who just has to perform the most basic task of lifting light objects is legally worth $31.52 but the waitress who works under the free market system isn’t?[/quote]
Push, I’ve been lurking here long enough to understand your position on economics somewhat. I am not arguing for a mandatory minimum wage set by the government.
I am about to walk out the door to go to work myself at the moment, so I’ll take more time to answer your post when I get home.
For the record, I am not against the concept of tipping. I am against the convention of institutionalized tipping.
[quote] tedro wrote:
Push, please thoroughly read a post before assuming everybody is insisting on governmental price controls. It was pretty obvious to me that osaka was just saying that there is no way the free market dictates a waiter must be given $30 an hour to keep all positions filled, as saveski suggested.
I’m sorry Montana has some ridiculous minimum wage laws, but quit trying to change this into an argument no one is trying to make.[/quote]
This is closer to what I was trying to convey. Clearly did a poor job of it.
[quote]LankyMofo wrote:
FTR, that’s actually a lot of money for what amounts to a PART TIME, NO SKILLS job. [/quote]
And this was my other point, also probably not as clearly articulated as I had meant it to be.
