Yes, my initial thought was that going from 10" circumference to 14", means roughly doubling the cross-section. If you think of the upper arm as a cylinder, double the volume too.
Doubling the size of an arm isn’t easy to do. You’d have to more than double the muscle, since the size of the bone is fixed and contributing to the initial size the same as it will to the latter size.
Thinking about arm size not as a circumference but as a cross-sectional area, gives me a perspective about making gains of 1/4", 1/2"… If you run the numbers on area, it starts to make sense how adding significant numbers to your arm circumference has been more difficult than expected.
Assuming a circular shape for the cross-section of the arm.

