Time Magazine Article: The White Supremacist Origins of Exercise

I know you didn’t ask me, but J Lo first comes to mind.

1 Like

A variety, but if i were to narrow it down to what I’d prefer… can I use Sir Mixalot’s ratios of 36-24-36? Joking.

Fit (preferably lifts weights), long hair, big eyes, big smile, preferably has curves in the right places, and I’ve got a thing for blonde (not a hard requirement). At the risk of sounding like every other guy on the planet - Scarlett Johanson… to be fair, my wife looks a lot like her so i can back up my claim (I’m aware you said not to say “my wife” but it’s quite true). I’m okay with tattoos, but nothing trashy and nothing on the face for sure. Height doesn’t matter that much to me, but probably not being taller than me (my wife is already my height).

As hinted to above: would also accept any and all Eva Mendes lookalikes.

Biggest thing for my “type” is not being lazy. So lack of fitness is a good indicator of that.

1 Like

Uh, Salma Hayek???

2 Likes

Feeling like the dudes in this thread are fans of Latinas.

1 Like

Minjee Lee from the lpga is my attraction

1 Like

Those countries produce some great looking women.
Personally a fan of Sofia Vagara (spelling?).

3 Likes

As a woman, I find this thread extremely entertaining

1 Like

Which segment?

1 Like

We are here to entertain others, :laughing:

1 Like

the whole thing

:joy:

1 Like

Heh. If it takes hard work or employment it’s “White Supremacy”. Go figure. :joy:

I stopped reading Time magazine many years ago. They used to keep up the appearance of being a serious current events magazine, but they don’t even try anymore. It’s just leftist nonsense carelessly packed into the rotted husk of Time Magazine’s rapidly-eroding reputation.

I’m here to confess that I’ve used strength training to physically impose my will on non-whites in certain circumstances. In these efforts I emerged supreme, so I’m probably one of those guys the magazine is writing about.

As far as sexy women go, I certainly have my preferences, but I’ve found that my penis responds favorably to a large spectrum of female appearances and behaviors.

3 Likes

Fixed it for you.

I too, only am interested in extreme amounts of muscle for the sake of oppressing those who have looks I do not like.

Research “supermarket redlining”.

In the case of inner cities theft, vandalism, on property violence as it pertains to owner liability and a slew of other behavioral problems lead the hesitancy to open stores, or cause stores to shutter. It’s literally not worth doing business because the target market is more destructive and costly than productive and profitable.

It’s not up to grocers to encourage human decency. Without blaming the year 1823, it’s up to a certain community in 2023 to begin behaving in a way that grocers want to be around them.

That is the fix. Improvement within the community itself. But it won’t be heard because “that’s racist” and assaulting people while stealing red, fleshy fruit is reparations.

7 Likes

This reminds me of white flight. I’ve read white flight mentioned on this forum several times. Wanna know who was part of white flight? My mom and her family, twice (Bronx, Lefrack City) and my dad and his family, once (Bronx). Although they were not white, they, like me, were white presenting.

Like elsewhere, white flight has been mentioned on here negatively. However, leaving places that had increasing criminality, including gang activity, theft, murder, rape, arson, vandalism, and felony assault, violence in schools, and social decay, is justified, whether it’s businesses or people leaving.

Plenty of related footage of the Bronx in the 70’s and 80’s is available on the net.

If my family fleeing was negative, I wonder what critics of white flight would say about staying that would be positive.

As usual, criticism is usual offered by those without experience.

4 Likes

Gentrification by force is always a good thing.

Sorry, I meant “diversity and inclusion”, not “gentrification”.

1 Like

I’ve never really understood why gentrification was bad. I suppose that rents get increased and people who can’t afford it get pushed out. BUT, to the outside observer, a “gentrified” area of the city goes from shithole to cool place to hang out, shop, eat, and maybe live. Not a bad thing really.

1 Like

For footage of what the Bronx degenerated into, I suggest these films:

Flyin’ Cut Sleeves
Rubble Kings (Netflix)
80 Blocks from Tiffany’s

1 Like

This is the part they leave out when a grocery store closes in a rough neighborhood.

It is often framed as if the grocery chains care about the color of the skin of the customers. It is obvious to me that making profits is what they care about. If it is profitable, they will sell food in any sort of neighborhood.

An Aldi just closed it’s doors not to far from me in North Minneapolis. They just said the location isn’t profitable. With Aldi, their margins are tiny. Only a bit of theft ruins their business model.

I do think it is reasonable to have empathy for the honest folks in those areas (which I believe to be a majority).

Perhaps a solution is to subsidize food delivery fees for certain areas?

Depends on who you ask.

At least where I am from, the areas that are getting gentrified should have never been cheap places to live. They were prime areas, inside the twin cities first loop, lots of rivers and lakes, beautiful 100+ year old houses. The affluent people left decades ago due to crime and other reasons. The people being priced out are upset because their rent is starting to reflect the actual value of their location (still not there yet). The people moving in are happy because they are in an awesome location, and can get huge beautiful houses.

My buddy bought a house in uptown around 2011 (just when that area was starting to get gentrified). People were coming in from the suburbs in droves. He got a 7 bed, 5 bath beautiful house (around 5500 sqft) for $150K. He rented out 6 rooms easily (he would post a listing and have calls within an hour). He brings in like $4500/month on a $150K house. A decade prior, someone could have rented the whole house for under $1000. I can see where they’d be mad now only being able to afford a bedroom.

I see it as neither good nor bad. Just reality.

1 Like

This part is always left out. Never the problem, always the victim. Even while eating their own shit.

1 Like