[quote]SkyzykS wrote:
Agent Frost wrote:
SkyzykS wrote:
He apologised for saying what he said, but not for how he feels.
He probably is sorry for saying it. The apology would be consistent with the act, and technicaly, good.
What people are holding against him is how he feels about gays. You probably whon’t get an apology for that.
It is a lot harder to apologise for how you feel than for what you did.
Again… stand behind your convictions. If you say something ABOUT how you feel in a forum that will garner you attention, either positive OR negative, then don’t turn around and apologize for saying it because you potentially damaged yourself in our PC society.
I could care less if he hates gays. There are times when i hate gays (quiet!), and i certainly wouldn’t attack someone because they hate gays. I will, again, however attack someone who says something then is to full of cowardice to stand behind what they said.
Well, I guess the distinction that I’m seeing him draw in that article is that he apologised for saying what he said, as in “I should not have said that”.
If he is not sorry for how he feels, which he hasn’t apologised for, then his integrity is intact.
A person can be an asshole and exist with their integrity intact, as long as they are consistently an asshole.
Would your opinion of him be any different if his response to public outcry was “I don’t care what people think, that is how I feel.” ?
[/quote]
Yes, I would have more respect for him.