[quote]Quick Ben wrote:
[quote]HeavyTriple wrote:
[quote]Quick Ben wrote:
Evolution doesn’t disprove a creator. It sure disproves and invalidates Christianity though.
1.[/quote]
Not really. I was put through 12 years of Catholic school, and evolution was taught as fact. As far as I know the Catholic church accepts evolution. Evolution only invalidates closed-minded sects of Christianity that insist on a literal interpretation of the Bible. In that respect, evolution invalidates the tenents of any religion that insists on a literal interpretation of their creation story, and they all have them.
Like people in here have already said, evolution and God are not mutually exclusive and they don’t need to be. But people are defensive and feel attacked at even the slightest dig at their religion, so they hunker down and dig in for a side that they don’t necessarily agree with. It’s basic psychology to fight the hardest and loudest for the things that are the most lacking in supporting evidence, because on some level we know that our arguments are weak in those situations.
I’m not religious, but guys like your boy Hitchens there are (were) excessively disdainful.[/quote]
They undermine the only authority they had when they start undermining their own holy book like they do. Evolution is utterly incompatible with the bible, and any true Christian MUST call it a filthy lie, or else be a watered down compromising coward.
Hitchens took a stand and spoke his mind clearly, you should take care not to confuse disdain for religion with disdain for any religious person.[/quote]
I obviously won’t make any headway with you on this, but understand that I am arguing for a side I don’t take personally; religions evolve. To pretend that doesn’t happen or undermines the faith is ridiculous. I don’t know Bible verses so I can’t quote them (nor do I care to look that srt of information up), but I think Jesus stressed the message of holy text, not the letter of the law, so to speak.
I like Hitchens. He was a very intelligent man, but he was also very pompous and condescending. I happen to agree with many of his points, but he comes off as very disdainful of anyone espousing religion. Whether he actually says it is irrelevant, because he makes it very clear that anyone who believes in such things is incredibly stupid. That is disdain, in my book.