[quote]Vash wrote:
Being a raging comic nerd, I would rather see the characters played as closely to the source material . . . which, in this instance, is actually several paces removed from the inspirational religious characters.
In the standard Marvel Universe, Ragnarok has happened at least one time previously. ALL the Asgardian characters died, and were recreated. Thor, the first (or a previous iteration) had red hair and a big-ass red beard. In comic, he was blonde and clean-shaven, usually.
So, considering the movies are mixing the original monthly Universe stories with the “Ultimate” stories, I don’t have a problem with a race change for one of the gods . . .
Are they still gods? I was actually very fond of the multiple religions with multiple creation stories being true at the same time in the Marvel U.
Depending on how the “techno-sorcery” thing plays out, I’ll either be very happy or very sad.
But I’ll still pay out the ass to see this movie twice.[/quote]
I don’t think many understand the changes made in the “Ultimate Universe”…where Nick Fury is black and Thor comes across as more of a champion for Green Earth and other motives meant to protect the planet’s resources. I actually feel the “ultimate” version is more real…but that may be the source of confusion seeing as many of the people complaining doubtfully even read these comics and are basing their opinion on “traditional” knowledge of the characters.
Some seemed surprised at the fact that captain America was frozen in ice for over 40 years.
The thing they NEED to accomplish with this movie in order to make the rest of that “universe” work is the link between magic and technology. Without making that connection more real for the audience, we will never see a Dr. Strange movie or any other character that is based in magic but works along side tech wizards like Stark.
They made people fall in love with the tech angle with the first Iron Man. I don’t know if the general public is ready for magic.