I remember those Sony Ericsson k750 phones that pretty much everyone had when I was just about leaving secondary school at 16. 2 megapixels was like WOW, surely you can’t get better than that? It’s like having a top of the range camera in your pocket!
I got myself a Nokia N70 also with a 2-megapixel camera, I thought I was a don with my “smart” phone.
When your application gets special consideration because your advisor or other letter writer knows people in the department/the ppl you want to work with
In the UCLA case, all the interviewers are my advisor’s coauthors so she pushed my app even though, under normal circumstances, my GRE score would have been grounds for my app to be filtered out.
I have yet to hear back from UCSD, but getting in would be pure nepotism. My advisor (same one) was the prof I want to work with (my academic hero)'s former PhD student and “4th daughter”. I actually do NOT have enough of a maths background for the programme; however, she got me in contact with him and he liked me enough to give an informal acceptance (95% chance of being admitted)
I love this song, but the dude’s reaction was also great. It makes me happy to see people get really into the things they’re passionate about (in his case, music).
That actually pisses me off. Shampoo is already 3 in 1 body wash, shampoo, and conditioner. The fact that someone probably got a promotion for relabelling shampoo as 3 in 1 is a sign of a degenerate society.
I used to think conditioner was unnecessary. I’ve changed my mind on it. Does have benefits that shampoo doesn’t offer. I think I get less breakage, and it feels softer.
I don’t really buy into needing expensive products though. Some people (my wife lol) really spend an arm and a leg on hair washing / conditioning products. I try to be objective and ask if the thing did the job it was supposed to, while starting with cheap products, and moving up if it isn’t good.