Thib's Q&A

[quote]T-Bone81 wrote:
CT,

Except in the case of a strongman competitor needing specific training for competition, would the use of a log bar for neutral-grip pressing be generally counterproductive for strength and mass gains due to the reduced and altered pressing ROM?

If so would neutral-grip DB presses and neutral-grip DB push presses(for increased HTMU activation relative to the “strict” version) be better choices due to the greater ROM and more natural path of motion?
[/quote]

I mentionned this SEVERAL million times… I DO NOT reply to reposts and this is the best way to get me to NEVER answer your questions.

CT,

What is your opinion of sugar alcohols and “net carbs” when it comes to insulin response/GI, and carb count. I’m not on a strict keto diet or anything, but maintain a generally low carb approach and have been using protein bars to get me through the work day. Thanks a lot.

[quote]Christian Thibaudeau wrote:
T-Bone81 wrote:
CT,

Except in the case of a strongman competitor needing specific training for competition, would the use of a log bar for neutral-grip pressing be generally counterproductive for strength and mass gains due to the reduced and altered pressing ROM?

If so would neutral-grip DB presses and neutral-grip DB push presses(for increased HTMU activation relative to the “strict” version) be better choices due to the greater ROM and more natural path of motion?

I mentioned this SEVERAL million times… I DO NOT reply to reposts and this is the best way to get me to NEVER answer your questions.[/quote]

Now I feel a bit insulted, because I had not previously posted this, but I do apologize if you mistook it for another post in the past or if it at all resembled a question recently posted somewhere.

I’m not here to try to waste your valuable time or arouse your ire by flouting rules, especially since you are so very generous with your knowledge.

And in spite of what I feel was an unnecessary and unwarranted castigation, your message about avoiding reposts is duly noted anyway, and I’ll be certain to abide by it.

For what it is worth I apoogize for any misunderstanding, Mr. Thibaudeau.

CT,

I’ve just realized I also must have asked a repeat question. I apologize for wasting your time - I’ll go find the original now.

Hey thib, what do you think about basing a leg session around the leg press instead of a back or front squat if your sole purpose was for hypertrophy. Like leg press first then something like machine hack squats and finishing with extensions.

Coach,

Care to share any thoughts/opinions related to this product?

http://mark-warnecke.de/amsport/amsport1_engl.html

Thanks.

[quote]shoelessjones wrote:
Coach,

Care to share any thoughts/opinions related to this product?

http://mark-warnecke.de/amsport/amsport1_engl.html

Thanks.[/quote]

I can’t comment on a product I have not tried or had my clients try.

hey Coach!

do you ever consider pyruvate for your low to no carb clients?

[quote]Christian Thibaudeau wrote:
sarah1 wrote:
CT, you have mentioned many times that it is only possible under the best circumstances for a female athlete to gain maybe 1-2 lbs of muslce a month.

I was wondering if that means training more and eating more does not work to speed up gains - do you mean that the body can only synthesize so much food and increasing training and food will still lead to unnecessary fat since you exceed your body’s ability to use nutrients for muscle growth??

I like to train but it makes me super hungry…I’m wondering if I should be forcing myself to workout less (right now I do a schedule of pretty intense full body in 1 on, 1 off, 2 on, 1 off, repeat)…

You might have misinterpreted what I said, or I may have explained myself poorly.

The 1-2lbs/month figure is not linear. Meaning that it doesn’t mean that it is IMPOSSIBLE to gain more than that in a month. Rather it is based on a monthly average of the maximum that can be achieved by a non-beginner in a year.

Under the best circumstances gaining around 12-20lbs of muscle per year is the utmost amount that one can achieve if he is not a beginner. And it is likely to be less than that, especially for a woman. So that comes up to an average of 1-2lbs per month. Some months you may gain more, some months your may gain less.

Understand that some people have a very screwed up idea of how much 20lbs of muscle really is. This is because of the whole ‘‘lean body mass’’ concept.

For example, if you are 120lbs with 10% body fat it means that you have 12lbs of fat and 108lbs of lean body mass.

However lean body mass doesn’t mean muscle mass. Lean body mass means everything in your body that itsn’t fat. This includes, muscle, water, bones, organs, skin, etc.

In reality muscle mass is equal to around 50% of your lean body mass. So if your LBM is 100lbs in reality you have around 50lbs of muscle.

Gaining 20lbs of muscle is thus an EXTREME gain compared to your current state!

Also understand that this 12-20lbs gain in muscle mass is actually dry muscle weight. In reality the scale weight will be greater because for each pound of muscle you add, you also add around 0.5lbs of water.

Now, back to your question…

You can’t force feed your body into adding more muscle. HOWEVER if you do not eat enough food/nutrients you will NLOT grow optimally. You NEED to consume an energy surplus and a godo amount of protein to grow muscle.

Eating big to get big is simply a way to ensure that you will not be lacking in the nutrients and energy department. However, once you get past the limit amount of nutrients that your body can use for fuel and growth, then it will not contribute to any more growth.

As for training… nobody has ever built an ounce of muscle in the gym… never happened, never will! You build muscle when you recover from your workouts. The sessions theselves are only the signal for the body to initiate the growth process.

[/quote]

Thanks CT. That makes a lot of sense.

Hi Coach…

What kind of split would you recommend for somebody who is trying to prioritize arms and shoulders for more mass (chest and back are strong points)?? Thanks for your time!

[quote]Christian Thibaudeau wrote:
shoelessjones wrote:
Coach,

Care to share any thoughts/opinions related to this product?

http://mark-warnecke.de/amsport/amsport1_engl.html

Thanks.

I can’t comment on a product I have not tried or had my clients try.[/quote]

Fair enough. Thanks for even looking at it.

Hello Christian,
i have been dieting for a very long time and got in very good condition,
i have lost alot of weight 50lbs so i have lost alot of muscle in the process.

i read your articel on bulking up naturally and found it very informative,
is it only possible i can only gain 1-2lbs of muscle a month as your article says, or is that just an average and is it possible beacause i was alot heavier with more muscle mass i could regain some muscle quicker initially or each month?

what would you suggest if you can would be an ideal total weight gain per month with as much muscle as possible and minimum fat gain?

thank you.

Hey CT

I’m 25 y/o. 165 lbs and 5’6". i just got back into trainging about 2 years ago. I started off with full body circuits 3days a week to shed some weight, i was up to 175 after college, and dropped down to 155by this time last year. Since then i started a push/pull routine 4 days a week, first for strength, then hypertrophy. I’m now up 2 165, good amount of muscle. However I’ve stalled, partyly due to stress, work, school, crappy roommates, etc. I’m taking a week off, and goin on vacation. Any suggestions to change things up? Also, i’ve been trying to eat enough, but always seem full, what would you suggest as far at digestive enyzymes, glutamine, and/or HCL?

Thanks for your time.

Hey CT,

Im currently 17. In my senior year of highschool. and when im done with my HS diploma I plan to open a personal training place with my best bud in st louis. My question is what is a really effective way to learn and apply this stuff the right way.

I don’t wonna be a screw up at this I really wonna help people. Do I go to college to learn this or is there a way to work under one of the good trainers. I just have no idea where to start.

Thib,

When significant lean mass accrual is the goal, do you think it is preferable to use one long, steady “gaining” phase or to alternate 8-12 week lean mass gain phases with 2-4 week maintenance(or even fat loss phases, if necessary) until the desired goal weight is achieved?

I was also wondering how different the overall nutrient requirements would be between an accumulation phase and an intensification phase…

While there are many variables involved, would the requirements be so drastically different as to warrant an adjustment in intake either up or possibly even slightly down(during an intensification phase) while gaining lean mass or should adjustments in nutrient intake be based upon evaluations(scale, body composition measurements, mirror, etc.) every 2-3 weeks or so regardless of the type of training phase you are in?

Let’s face it guys. As the wedding day approaches, and for several weeks thereafter; we are going to have to share Thib’s with his wife to be and all that goes into the ceremony, reception and honeymoon.

Coach,

Just got my lab results back from my annual physical… and my question is about my testosterone serum level… what does my number below mean to a Coach such as yourself? I am 41 years of age.

Cholesterol -144
Triglycerides - 39
HDL - 63
LDL - 73
Testosterone, serum - 413

Thank you very much for your time and opinion if I get one.

[quote]shoelessjones wrote:
Coach,

Just got my lab results back from my annual physical… and my question is about my testosterone serum level… what does my number below mean to a Coach such as yourself? I am 41 years of age.

Cholesterol -144
Triglycerides - 39
HDL - 63
LDL - 73
Testosterone, serum - 413

Thank you very much for your time and opinion if I get one.

[/quote]

It means that you are TECHNICALLY in the average range. But to me it is EXCEPTIONALY LOW. To maximise muscle growth and body comp, serum test should be at least 1000ng/dl.

[quote]ThetfordMiner wrote:
Thib,

When significant lean mass accrual is the goal [/quote]

I hate it when people try to use big words like ‘‘accrual’’ to sound smart. Can’t you say ‘‘muscle gain’’ like everybody else? Complexity of the langage of the simple mind.

[quote]ThetfordMiner wrote:
, do you think it is preferable to use one long, steady “gaining” phase or to alternate 8-12 week lean mass gain phases with 2-4 week maintenance(or even fat loss phases, if necessary) until the desired goal weight is achieved? [/quote]

Depends on the individual’s body composition, his tendency to gain fat or not, his current level of muscle mass, his preference for staying lean or not, etc.

Realistically, a non-beginner can hope to gain 5-10lbs of MUSCLE TISSUE in 8-12 weeks if that helps you make your decision.

[quote]miniarnold wrote:
Hello Christian,
i have been dieting for a very long time and got in very good condition,
i have lost alot of weight 50lbs so i have lost alot of muscle in the process.

i read your articel on bulking up naturally and found it very informative,
is it only possible i can only gain 1-2lbs of muscle a month as your article says, or is that just an average and is it possible beacause i was alot heavier with more muscle mass i could regain some muscle quicker initially or each month?

[/quote]

Common man… I answered that EXACT question at length something like 7-8 posts back in this thread.