[quote]Christian Thibaudeau wrote:
AtomicPunks wrote:
Coach Thibaudeau,
When it comes to fat loss and Energy Systems Training, particularly the higher intensity types, is it best to always strive to increase the average intensity of the sessions over the course of many weeks or should things be dialed back for a week every few weeks before picking up the intensity level again and continuing on(a de-load for EST, if you will)?
Would it be preferable to just select a new mode of EST every four weeks or so and simply progress the intensity of the sessions for all four weeks before switching to the next type to be used? e.g. 4 weeks- Versaclimber intervals; 4 weeks- interval medley: sled pulling, Prowler pushing, sledgehammer swinging, sandbag carrying, Farmer’s walk, etc.; 4 weeks- Concept 2 rower intervals; 4 weeks- bodyweight exercises and kettlebell swing circuits
There are several things to consider here…
- Depending on your diet, not all ESW methods are adequate. For example, someone who is on a super low carbs diet and is already strength training several times a week, intervals work might not be optimal over the long run.
See it this way… the more intense an activity is, the more glycogen-dependant it becomes. If your glycogen stores are low (and considering that weight training uses mostly glycogen for fuel already) then doing a lot of other high intensity activities might not be optimal over the long run.
-
For the same reason you can’t always seek to increase ESW intensity. As I mentionned, and increase in intensity will increase the reliance on carbs/glycogen for energy. And in a low carbs environment this could have ill effects on your recovery, workout performance and eventually muscle mass.
-
On paper high-intensity ESW is better. However that’s true mostly for fat loss diets that still include a sufficient amount of carbs.[/quote]
Thib,
Provided that carb intake and the frequency and intensity of such sessions were well matched, is there anything “fundamentally” flawed with the sample arrangement that I posted above?
For fat loss and performance, proper progression must be observed, and in the case of fat loss you need to focus on creating metabolic disturbances as opposed to just maintaining a certain level of performance/ increasing efficiency. However, I also get the distinct feeling that with fat loss, it’s primarily about letting a reasonable reduction in caloric intake drive fat loss, using weight training to preserve muscle, and then supplementing with the appropriate intensity and amount of ESW based upon recovery capacity, nutrient intake, etc.
I guess I am just trying to reconcile the progression and metabolic disturbance part with the fact that not every type of ESW is appropriate under all circumstances.