[quote]RustBeltGym wrote:
Thib,
I have a few questions for you.
- Can the frequent use of 3 and 4-board presses for triceps work lead to triceps dominance and the regular bench press becoming less effective over time for developing the pectorals? [/quote]
Yes, which is one of the reasons why it’s a great exercise for ‘‘equipped’’ powerlifters (the bench shirt provides a lot of help at the beginning of the movement, making the bench into a triceps dominant event).
[quote]RustBeltGym wrote:
2) For lagging pecs, would the following methods be of useful in helping to bring them up to par: 1 and 1/4 reps with bench press (extra quarter rep performed at the bottom of the ROM), [/quote]
Yes… I already discussed those in an issue of my old column ‘‘Bulk up, get cut’’.
[quote]RustBeltGym wrote:
1 and 2-board presses, [/quote]
No
[quote]RustBeltGym wrote:
mechanical advantage sets- “fly” eccentric with press concentric, [/quote]
Yes, but only as an assistance exercise
[quote]RustBeltGym wrote:
functional isos just above chest for 6-9 seconds followed 2-3 minutes later by regular sets of bench presses in the 4-6 or 6-8 rep range, bench presses with each rep starting from a dead stop on pins just above chest level?[/quote]
Yes
[quote]RustBeltGym wrote:
3) For exercises like floor flies, floor pullovers, and other movements starting from a dead stop; when are such movements best utilized? On the one hand, starting from a dead stop would increase MU recruitment, but it also removes the pre-stretch, which also contributes to increased MU recruitment. So would these movements best used as potentiation-type movements?
Thanks, coach! [/quote]
It doesn’t really matter, but if you use a dead start movement, you must also use a stretch movement for the same muscle group in the session.