[quote]Christian Thibaudeau wrote:
No question! I always tell competitors that the first cut is always the hardest one because your ‘‘normal body fat treshold’’ is higher.
When you get ripped then stay very lean, your body gradually adjusts its set point (this takes time though) so it becomes easier to diet down to super low levels.
There is also the insulin sensitivity issue… the leaner you are, the more insulin sensitive you are (the better you respond to carbs) so what you eat is more easily stored in the muscle and less easily as fat.
The first time I dieted down I could not really lose a lot of fat unless I dropped my carbs below 100g/day.
Now I can eat 200g and get lean and as much as 400g and not gain fat.
Heck, my ex-girlfriend who competed for 15 years and stayed lean for most of these years could get ripped to the bone at an intake of 350g of carbs per day! And she was 130lbs.
[/quote]
Just a question, but do you believe that this may have something to do with the “high carb diets are always the best” myth we’ve heard so many years now?
I mean, as most research on athletes is done with endurance athletes who consume tons of carbs, and as most research athletes maintain a certain level of leanness year round (but def. not bodybuilder lean/definition), do you think maybe the years of studying endurance athletes had skewed the opinions of the research crowd?
hopefully that is a clear question. Also it just occurred to me out of the blue when reading your above reply. Sorry didn’t mean to hijack your thread but it seemed tangentially related to what you just replied to Rogerson about.
As regards your current cut, and to make up for hijacking, are you going to be undergoing the same set of Poliquin supplements that you used last time to get your back shredded, or have a different protocol planned? You mentioned how good those worked for you last time.