[quote]roybot wrote:
AngryVader wrote:
Doug Adams wrote:
AngryVader wrote:
roybot wrote:
Mark Steven Johnson (for burying two of the most promising comic book adaptations)
'Jason Friedberg & Aaron Seltzer - these sadistic tools inflicted Scary Movie and its variants on us (that’s right! They are responsible for them all)…
Excellent choices. The Friedbert & Seltzer combo have caused me to waste several hours of my life and simultaneously killed a few brain cells as well.
Award for ‘most promising fledgling tool’ goes to Channing Tatum.
heheh…you hate Channing Tatum almost as much as Doug Adams hates Paul Walker. 
I just watched another terrible Channing Tatum movie last weekend. He’s quickly rising to the top of my list.
Believe me, my radar is honed in on the possible bogey known as Channing Tatum. If he does a poor job in G.I. Joe…
However, I’m not claiming him, or even Paul Walker, or even shudder Hayden Christensen to be tools. “The media” is not propping these guys up. They have their fans and studios are banking on the fact that those fans will see the movies, along with people who don’t know any better. These facts do not make them tools.
David Caruso, OTOH, IS a tool.
This is true. I haven’t really seen those three do anything that would make me call them out for being a tool. The stuff Christensen’s been guilty of would definitely qualify him as being a pussy or a baby though (chasing a fan down the street for saying he ruined Star Wars, asking Lucasfilm lawyer to sue Kevin Smith for saying he sucked).
Tatum and Walker are definitely guilty of being bad actors though.
Did I mention that Channing Tatum used to be an Abercrombie model?
[/quote]
I didn’t know that about him. It certainly doesn’t help his cause. In fact, I think that’s two strikes in my book. If he sucks in G.I. Joe, then that will be third.