The Stupid Thread 2 (Part 2)

I would like to see equal application, but not similar efforts to what transpired in this case.

This was similar to his impeachments- toothless, farcical immitations of action.

The danger is that if they can twist the law into making an NDA into 34 counts of “pick a law, any law!” on one of the most powerful and affluent men in the world, what do you think they can do to an everyman?

You don’t think trump had an affair? Paid her off? Or used campaign money to pay her off?

Or do you think he did all of that, but shouldn’t have been prosecuted and convicted?

I have never been under any other impression then they could do what they wanted to me if the feeling struck them.

We have allowed the government in general to get to big and powerful, the exact thing the republic was created to go against…

1 Like

Dude, what ever iteration this is of who you were before isnt working.

Go back to what ever your other profile was. You just look dumb arguing against false premise.

At least if you use your previous one, it will look like the same idiot instead of multiple.

Forget the clown show(s) in NYC.

The most obvious disparity in the application of “justice” is the classified documents case in Florida, where Trump might actually be guilty of breaking a law…one which no politician ever gets tried for, and Joe Biden (who’s crime was even worse because he was just a VP with no ability to declassify documents) has already been “cleared” of because…wait for it…in the opinion of the DOJ lawyer, Joe is too addled to be convicted…but Joe is fine to be your President for 4 more years!!!

You can’t make this shit up.

2 Likes

To be clear here, in 2016 I thought Trump and Hilary were both so bad I couldn’t bring myself to vote for either one.

Now the DemTards with their BS have pushed me into being a Trump “enthusiast”. You can’t make this shit up.

1 Like

Can’t answer why you disagree, you just have that gut feeling trump is innocent. Got it.

No reason to discuss further with you.

Blah blah blah. I dismissed you like 10 posts ago.

You must have been overcome by a wanderlust from reality to have missed that.

Reality is always stranger than fiction.

La de duhhhh…

Nothing to see here.

1 Like

I might have to start a thread about Donald Trump being a hero.

Adulterer, felon, bankrupt. A hero is someone you look UP to… You really think you’re below that? Wow.

There’s that deplorable-class mentality!

“If others around me are doing bad things, that means I should be able to do bad things and have a victims mentality if/when the consequences catch up to me!”. JD Vance wrote about this exact mentality in Hillbilly Elegy.

Pure projection on your part. And overthinking it.

Its a synopsis of the hypocracy of leftists.

You can be a privileged crack smoking lunatic when daddy is a good member of the party.

You can be a self enriching launderer of humsn rights violators, murderous wife of a serial rapist, etc. As long as you are a good member of the party.

You can run a rape factory/fantasy island.

You can just outright lie to capitalize on tragedy and cover any professional wrongdoing that kills millions and disrupts the entire planet.

As long as you are a good member of the party.

Leave it to a lefty to treat real working class people and their pains of life as a weapon.

Sad. Pathetic. Leftist.

It’s about the drug addict, jobless, abusive class of folks stuck in the cycle in large part caused from a victim mentality of “others do wrong too, why am I suffering consequences?” It’s the same class of people Hillary called deplorables.

So it’s actually about the non-working class. And you posting that meme about Democrats who have done wrong, as a defense of your dear leader who has also done wrong reminded me of Vance’s book.

It’s bad logic, and an unhealthy mentality to hold. Objectively. Don’t condone and defend wrong behavior and actions.

Ah, see, theres the disconnect. You think its in defense. Its not. Its a stand alone statement in conjunction with a conversation about equal application. :man_facepalming:

You’ll have to forgive me if I don’t trust your interpretation of what a book is about. You’ve already shown ample bias and a strong tendency to misinterpret, then use that misinterpretation to jump to a faulty conclusion.

And I have blue collar roots planted squarely in the rust belt. So I don’t need to act like I know something because I read a book. I’ve lived it.

:rofl: thats cute!

Now tell me what this means. :rofl:

What were the crimes that he was found guilty of???

I still haven’t heard a coherent explanation of why a NY prosecutor, who campaigned on changing Trump with an unspecified crime, was prosecuting a federal election case that federal prosecutors declined to pursue.

NPR explained his conviction by acknowledging the shaky legal ground it stands on while justifying it as “legal karma”.

Apparently karma manifests by prosecutors concocting novel legal theories and realizing that these new crimes took place seven years ago.

This is straight out of the Soviet playbook.

2 Likes

Falsification of business records to cover up his affair.

11 invoices, 12 ledger entries and 11 checks (nine signed by Trump himself).

But the stupidist thing is he has been known as a serial adulterer for decades, so why do all that?

Maybe he was worried that since it was with a porn star it would hurt him with Christian voters, but they already overlook all the other stuff he does.