The Stupid Thread 2 (Part 2)

Osprey has released extended fit backpacks. At first I thought they would fit a more athletic build by putting more in the shoulder and chest adjustments but nope:


Who has 70” hips and backpacks regularly enough to warrant an Osprey pack?

I like Osprey packs and have two of their everyday backpacks. This is a bit absurd though. I am all for folks getting into shape and staying active but the target audience here should probably not start with hikes though the mountains or all day bike rides.

Both images from the same email blast…

Does she have knees?

Invisible knees are the new thigh gap.

I’d buy that. I stick with external frames for that reason.

And hey, those people are being active, so good for them.

It still belongs in this thread though.

Drumsticks. Like at the Renaissance Fair.

Stick is not a word I would use.

Do they also carry industrial grade grease? So she can grease up those ham hocks to prevent a catastrophic fire [chub rub]!

The Huberman article is retarded, but I kind of understand it’s purpose.

If you’re over forty, have a working penis, a job and all of your limbs (a Chris Rock reference) as well as no previous marriages or kids you become instantly more attractive to a very specific subset of single women as you have no distractions in terms of time (children from previous relationships) and more importantly money (alimony/child support).

Now, this specific subset of women in late thirties or early forties includes stereotypes such as the corporate climber, a frustrated divorcee or a longterm side chick but their common characteristic is that their internal biological clock is making its last ditch effort - a intense few years in which they become obsessed with having babies/adoption before they settle on the “dogmom” or a “crazy cat lady” lifepath (these are very broad generalizations of course).

If you show up at a date with such a woman and explain that you’re single, childless and that you’d be open to having a child “if you met the right person” you’re getting laid immediately. And I mean immediately. And if you have no moral qualms you can exploit this situation and get some impressive bodycount numbers.

And the added boon is that these women tend to be super-busy - either a symptom or the cause of them being still single - so you can work them around your schedule relatively easily, as Huberman did, although on a impressive scale.

I’m not going to get into the morality of this and I like to think I’d be above this if I weren’t married with a bunch of kids, but I’ll say this - if you’re 45 and you’re banging another 45 year old, falsely claiming that you’re exclusive and promising her that you’ll freeze a joint embryo you’re not exactly an alpha male (even if she’s no moral bulwark but under investigation by the FDA for fraud) but kind of sad.

And coming back to the first point - I assume that a significant portion of the New Yorker readership are those very frustrated women that have already met a very low cost Huberman in their lives, hence the unusually bitter tone. Besides them, no one really gives a shit about a podcaster banging a plethora of middle aged women under false pretenses.

Speaking about podcasters, Alexey Fedotov - or “Lex Friedman” as he calls himself - presents an actual present danger - he’s an incel manifesto away from becoming a mass shooter.

I’m this guy to a T… nearly EVERY woman you meet now is constantly “busy” yet fails to see that’s likely why she can’t find a “good guy”…

Good job guys! This was super important.

It is

I am all for going back to whole natural foods. This stuff can’t be good for us.

Has one specific purpose in design… weaken people

Agreed.
Don’t be self sufficient and grow your own food or buy from local farmers when possible - trust big food for all your nutritional needs. When that fails trust big Pharma.

Ironically the leftoids that loved calling everyone else “bootlickers” can’t get enough of this trash

I am pretty left leaning myself, but we could solve a lot more food problems by not letting grocery stores stock way too much food and throw you literally billions of pounds of meat and produce every year.

1 Like

I have a few classical liberal values but the neo left are insufferable cunts and I agree 100%… it’s truly heartbreaking

3 Likes

My suppliers have said this same thing. We throw away close to 30% of the food we produce.

And it’s a a two-pronged problem. Grocery stores and restaurants have been sued for giving excess food away and people claim it made them sick. Then if you let your underpaid workers take food home, the rate of miscooked food skyrockets.

1 Like

Who’s letting them do this, and how do you propose we fix this problem?

1 Like

Free Palestine!!!