The Stupid Thread 2 (Part 1)

The thing to do is go back to the States paying a tax to be part of the U.S. How the Federal Government lays claim to each individual in the country makes no difference; it should not be claiming any of us.

1 Like

All for it

Don’t tax me on what i make, tax me on what i spend

get rid of all loopholes

I totally agree with your thoughts.

1 Like

I am curious to what loopholes you are referring to? I am not being antagonistic. I just lump people talking about tax loopholes in the same group that talk about gun show loopholes.

1 Like

Hi, my name is George Soros and I like to donate 100million/year to my non-profit charity to ensure I have enough tax writeoffs to not pay taxes.

My non-profit charity then disburses these donations out to for-profit charities, which donate to political candidates I like.

I like any system that lets me pay myself for my own interests and write it off as ā€˜charity’.

I am not sure how you would stop that without decimating all charitable giving.

Also, anyone that thinks the tax code is not going to be written to favor the wealthy is living in fantasy land.

I have heard about taxing unrealized gains to stop the ultra-wealthy from borrowing against their assets as debt - which does not count as income. Another non-starter and ignorance in my mind.

You are not going to beat the wealthy at this 10,000-page tax game. I prefer a consumption tax with no write-offs and no exclusions, which would put an end to all of this. The more you spend - the more you pay. That seems very fair to me.

3 Likes

Right, which is why this could be shortened to a few pages where it describes sales taxes based on type of goods.

Agreed, and I don’t think necessities should be taxed or it should be a much lower %. Like food, water, toiletries, etc.

2 Likes

Write offs, exclusions

you buy, you pay tax…even overseas buying and even internet purchases

only time you dont have to is food, medical and those that live below the poverty line

I have never agreed with this. If you exist and purchase in this model, you should pay taxes. Everyone needs to have skin in the game.

2 Likes

Could not agree more.

Since we’re talking about ā€˜skin in the game’, i think it’s about time to open up the draft for women too. May as well include anything in between him and her while we’re at it!

Equality for all!
^nothing in this post is sarcastic

1 Like

The only reason i say this is because usually those in poverty are negatively impacted the most

1 Like

True equality.

We all know the feminists never wanted equality. They want all the perks, but none of the responsibilities.

3 Likes

How many below the poverty line have money that they’ve earned?

That is a good question, but I really don’t have any concrete facts to back up my thoughts.

My initial thoughts are very few.

I knew this would fail

And I imagine the writers are due for a firing

The person (Mindy Kaling), who thought adult entertainment revolved around a cartoon about sexualized 15 year olds, should be called out as the sick piece of garbage she is. My daughter made it through about 10 minutes before she turned it off. Woke humor just isn’t funny.

2 Likes

Is everything woke nowadays? Perhaps the show is just bad and that’s it…

They race swapped three main characters.

Alienating original scooby doo fans (forced diversity)

Velma is now a lesbian (identity politics for no reason)

Even in the trailer, snide remarks are made about the audience the show was supposed to cater towards

And no… everything isn’t woke. Wokeness is what mediated a 1.9/10 rating on imdb

Even critics are finally waking it up, and this show has been bombed by critics and audiences alike for being edgy for the sake of being edgy, woke for the sake of ham fisted agendas that have no place in a scooby doo origin story.

It’s almost like a bunch of writers managed to get ahold of the licensing rights to scooby doo. Followed by which they sat down in a room and thought ā€œhow can we alienate our audience, try really hard to be edgy and push identity politics?ā€

Numerous companies like warner brothers have caught on to how wokeness isn’t getting butts in seats. The company is now conducting damage control

Shows like velma imo are a dying breed now, and we can clearly see there’s huge backlash from audiences… people don’t want to watch this

Who are these shows for? No one is buying a ticket…

I’m going to go off on a tangent now.

It’s not racist to be irritated with the race swapping either. A common arguement used to shut down disdain or irritation aimed at making previously white characters suddenly asian, indian or black is ā€œwhat are you? Racist? Why does it matter if we swap the racesā€

First of all… why can’t a character that has always been white for some fifty years or so stay white? The character NEEDS to now be reminiscent of a minority… that almost seems like racism to me.

That and, it’s not the race people are upset about. Those who pull the race card to ineffectively stifle dissent towards race swapping fail to fundamentally grasp… these are cartoons that many have watched from childhood. There is a degree of nostalgia mediated from seeing familiar faces once again. Particuarly if you had fond memories of watching something like scooby doo

Now we see all of a sudden the characters race has been swapped… for no reason, with no explanation… just retconning history at that point as it’s an origin story.

Not only that, but in the trailer the writers had the audacity to poke fun at the audience the show was supposed to be aimed at. As if they knew it would cause controversy but went ahead ā€œif you don’t like it… well fuck you thenā€.

Great way to ensure your audience puts down the remote.

Like who are these shows aimed towards

  • its not appropriate for kids (rated TVMA…) and kids who are watching it don’t seem to be liking it
  • adolescents don’t like it
  • adults don’t like it
  • original scooby doo fans don’t like it

Feels like it was just a circle jerk between the writers and the actors.

2 Likes