[quote]smh23 wrote:
I believe they have a full, raw ball and boner shot now.[/quote]
Yeah, I had edited my post saying I had found that pic but it didn’t take, I guess.
[quote]MaximusB wrote:
[quote]reddog6376 wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
[quote]MaximusB wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
Americans think it is their right to get involved with all aspects of some one’s life , He was GUILTY of flirting with consenting adults , shame on him , this is redickulust :)[/quote]
This is a guy who represent alot of people and responsibility, he should be above bullshit like this. How do we trust people with serious issues and policies when he can’t even keep his dick in his pants?
Would you want this guy as your representative Pitt? Would you trust him to make the wisest of decisions with proof of such stupidity ?[/quote]
That is what we have elections for , I do not know much about him , I would have to research his voting record to answer your question,
I would agree that posting Mr Happy on the internet was not the smartest thing one could do , but in his defense he thought he had the cover of privacy. Which I feel he does.[/quote]
Hey dumbass, he tweeted them. That’s how he got busted. He didn’t IM or email them, he f’ing tweeted them.
[/quote]
Did he ever apologize to the camera man he called a jackass ? Or was it another reporter that he called a jackass ? Or was he still smug assuming he did no wrong.
Pitt, if you put out naked pics and you are a politician, you are stupid as fuck.[/quote]
I agree that putting out naked pics of your self is not the best career choice you can make ,but there was no law broken, no harm done , just a bunch of self righteous people clamoring, the majority of which are Republicans , so we have another partisan issue .
This is nothing plane and simple, fuck I may move to NYC so I can vote him Mayor 
If he’s been fooling around with minors, he has to go. (17 is not a minor with regard to sexuality in NY though).
If he hasn’t: he was caught doing something stupid, creepy, kind of pathetic. Let’s not get ahead of ourselves here and start painting him like the son of Satan just for this. He sent pictures of his dick to people. Ted Kennedy killed a woman and then left the scene of the accident. Perspective is good.
[quote]smh23 wrote:
If he’s been fooling around with minors, he has to go. (17 is not a minor with regard to sexuality in NY though).
If he hasn’t: he was caught doing something stupid, creepy, kind of pathetic. Let’s not get ahead of ourselves here and start painting him like the son of Satan just for this. He sent pictures of his dick to people. Ted Kennedy killed a woman and then left the scene of the accident. Perspective is good.[/quote]
Damn, I was ready to jump all over that, but when you’re right you’re right. I always thought 18. I think he lucked out on that one.
The age of consent in New York is 17.
The offense will be more serious depending on relative ages, thus:
â?¢Sex with a person under 17 is a misdemeanor if the perpetrator is at least 16 (see infra). (“Sexual misconduct,” NY Penal Law § 130.20.)
â?¢Sex with a person under 17 is a Class “E” felony if the perpetrator is at least 21. (“Rape in the third degree,” NY Penal Law § 130.25; “Criminal sexual act in the third degree,” NY Penal Law § 130.40.)
â?¢Sex with a person under 15 is a Class “D” felony if the perpetrator is at least 18. However, it is a defense to this charge if an 18 year-old perpetrator proves by a preponderance that he or she was less than four years older than the victim. This is not a defense to any other charge that might apply, i.e., Sexual misconduct, supra. (“Rape in the second degree,” NY Penal Law § 130.30; “Criminal sexual act in the second degree,” NY Penal Law § 130.45.)
â?¢Sex with a person under 13 is a Class “B” violent felony if the perpetrator is at least 18. (“Rape in the first degree,” NY Penal Law § 130.35[4]; “Criminal sexual act in the first degree,” NY Penal Law § 130.50[4].)
â?¢Sex with a person under 11 is a Class “B” violent felony if the perpetrator is at least 16. (“Rape in the first degree,” NY Penal Law § 130.35[3]; “Criminal sexual act in the first degree,” NY Penal Law § 130.50[3].)
“Sex,” as used above, refers to the four conspicuous types of sexual acts, including “sexual intercourse”, and the three forms of acts known as “deviant sexual intercourse” under the former (pre-2003) law, now called “oral sexual conduct” (both types), and “anal sexual conduct.”
[quote]biglifter wrote:
[quote]smh23 wrote:
If he’s been fooling around with minors, he has to go. (17 is not a minor with regard to sexuality in NY though).
If he hasn’t: he was caught doing something stupid, creepy, kind of pathetic. Let’s not get ahead of ourselves here and start painting him like the son of Satan just for this. He sent pictures of his dick to people. Ted Kennedy killed a woman and then left the scene of the accident. Perspective is good.[/quote]
Damn, I was ready to jump all over that, but when you’re right you’re right. I always thought 18. I think he lucked out on that one.
[/quote]
It’s kind of surprising, isn’t it? A 17 year old girl is old enough to fuck a 50 year old man in New York but she is still almost half a decade away from being old enough to have a beer. These laws seem odd when they’re juxtaposed.
This has probably been said, but the real wonder here is a fairly seasoned politician in the internet age who still thinks that absolutely anytime he ever flinches or blinks or that absolutely ANYTHING he utters to anybody, anywhere, anytime is safe from going public. Really. Even average civilian shlub politicos sitting in their lay-z-boys know better than this.
The 17 yr old is in Delaware, not NY. Get ready Weiner, they are gonna LOVE you in prison.
I am so happy about this, I am ready to go to church. I HATE this fucker.
The age of consent in Delaware is 16 but requires parental consent, and 18 without parental consent.
Could be interesting.
[quote]Tiribulus wrote:
This has probably been said, but the real wonder here is a fairly seasoned politician in the internet age who still thinks that absolutely anytime he ever flinches or blinks or that absolutely ANYTHING he utters to anybody, anywhere, anytime is safe from going public. Really. Even average civilian shlub politicos sitting in their lay-z-boys know better than this.[/quote]
I agree with you, but this man is seriously perverted. He has been doing this shit, and has had this problem for years most likely. This is an addiction.
Does anyone here still think there are only 6 women involved here?
I watched Real Time with Bill Maher last night, and one of the guests was Janine Garafolo (vomit). She commented about how this didn’t affect anyone’s life in any way. But I have to disagree. Personally, I don’t want anyone in our government doing this shit (that goes for either party). I mean, why don’t we just scrape the bottom of dumpsters for people to run for office at this point. We all know that these fuck-tards do this, but why do we accept it?
Something I noticed about California politics (the WORST in the history of any state or country)…politicians do not fear voters when they continually get reelected time and time again. And you see this shit in Washington too. People accept the mediocre (at best) performance as tolerable and status quo, so they reelect the same idiots thinking no one else could do any better.
The moment you vote fuckers out for bullshit like this, they wise up. They get no leash. Throw them out. Last election cycle, 6 Cali Republicans voted for the highest tax increase in US history, and now ALL of them are out and unemployed, one went back to being a butcher LOL.
[quote]MaximusB wrote:
[quote]Tiribulus wrote:
This has probably been said, but the real wonder here is a fairly seasoned politician in the internet age who still thinks that absolutely anytime he ever flinches or blinks or that absolutely ANYTHING he utters to anybody, anywhere, anytime is safe from going public. Really. Even average civilian shlub politicos sitting in their lay-z-boys know better than this.[/quote]
I agree with you, but this man is seriously perverted. He has been doing this shit, and has had this problem for years most likely. This is an addiction.
Does anyone here still think there are only 6 women involved here?
I watched Real Time with Bill Maher last night, and one of the guests was Janine Garafolo (vomit). She commented about how this didn’t affect anyone’s life in any way. But I have to disagree. Personally, I don’t want anyone in our government doing this shit (that goes for either party). I mean, why don’t we just scrape the bottom of dumpsters for people to run for office at this point. We all know that these fuck-tards do this, but why do we accept it?
[/quote]
I was dying when Maher and the chick from Glee read excerpts from the Weiner conversations. That dude is one dirty motherfucker.
No American Gov. fear the voters , because they know that all they (Government) have to do is control the media and the Media will control the people,I can not understand how his (Weiner’s) personal life is any body’s Business other than his own, maybe if Charges are brought against him than maybe some may deem unfit to serve America .
Every one is concerned about Weiner’s weener and not a mention of a real subject that is important.
Look at this board
top ten subjects
4 on religion
1 on Wiener’s weener
1 on the brilliance of Sara Palin
1 that is comparing the superior intellect of BUSH VS OBAMA
1 on Turkey
and 1 on finance
I contend our Governemt is just as easilly destracted
I am beginning to think Breitbart a Genius , take non issues and blow them up into National Incidents
[quote]MaximusB wrote:
[quote]Tiribulus wrote:
This has probably been said, but the real wonder here is a fairly seasoned politician in the internet age who still thinks that absolutely anytime he ever flinches or blinks or that absolutely ANYTHING he utters to anybody, anywhere, anytime is safe from going public. Really. Even average civilian shlub politicos sitting in their lay-z-boys know better than this.[/quote]
I agree with you, but this man is seriously perverted. He has been doing this shit, and has had this problem for years most likely. This is an addiction.
Does anyone here still think there are only 6 women involved here?
I watched Real Time with Bill Maher last night, and one of the guests was Janine Garafolo (vomit). She commented about how this didn’t affect anyone’s life in any way. But I have to disagree. Personally, I don’t want anyone in our government doing this shit (that goes for either party). I mean, why don’t we just scrape the bottom of dumpsters for people to run for office at this point. We all know that these fuck-tards do this, but why do we accept it?
Something I noticed about California politics (the WORST in the history of any state or country)…politicians do not fear voters when they continually get reelected time and time again. And you see this shit in Washington too. People accept the mediocre (at best) performance as tolerable and status quo, so they reelect the same idiots thinking no one else could do any better.
The moment you vote fuckers out for bullshit like this, they wise up. They get no leash. Throw them out. Last election cycle, 6 Cali Republicans voted for the highest tax increase in US history, and now ALL of them are out and unemployed, one went back to being a butcher LOL.
[/quote]
Max, the problem is, most of this shit comes out AFTER they’re elected. Why wasn’t any of this, if it has been going on for years, discovered before he was elected?
[quote]Grneyes wrote:
[quote]MaximusB wrote:
[quote]Tiribulus wrote:
This has probably been said, but the real wonder here is a fairly seasoned politician in the internet age who still thinks that absolutely anytime he ever flinches or blinks or that absolutely ANYTHING he utters to anybody, anywhere, anytime is safe from going public. Really. Even average civilian shlub politicos sitting in their lay-z-boys know better than this.[/quote]
I agree with you, but this man is seriously perverted. He has been doing this shit, and has had this problem for years most likely. This is an addiction.
Does anyone here still think there are only 6 women involved here?
I watched Real Time with Bill Maher last night, and one of the guests was Janine Garafolo (vomit). She commented about how this didn’t affect anyone’s life in any way. But I have to disagree. Personally, I don’t want anyone in our government doing this shit (that goes for either party). I mean, why don’t we just scrape the bottom of dumpsters for people to run for office at this point. We all know that these fuck-tards do this, but why do we accept it?
Something I noticed about California politics (the WORST in the history of any state or country)…politicians do not fear voters when they continually get reelected time and time again. And you see this shit in Washington too. People accept the mediocre (at best) performance as tolerable and status quo, so they reelect the same idiots thinking no one else could do any better.
The moment you vote fuckers out for bullshit like this, they wise up. They get no leash. Throw them out. Last election cycle, 6 Cali Republicans voted for the highest tax increase in US history, and now ALL of them are out and unemployed, one went back to being a butcher LOL.
[/quote]
Max, the problem is, most of this shit comes out AFTER they’re elected. Why wasn’t any of this, if it has been going on for years, discovered before he was elected?[/quote]
Because the press is biased and will eagerly accept a president that will lie under oath as long as he shares their agenda.
All presidents lie. Sometimes it is about getting their dick sucked and other times it is about covert bombing operations. I prefer the former.
Greeny,
I don’t even think anything would change if this shit happened before he was elected. You have polls showing that he is STILL considered a viable candidate for NY mayor. When guys like this are not booted and/or not reelected, other realize that there is some kind of grace for them should they (more like when they) fuck up to this level of magnitude.
Our mayor of Los Angeles was found guilty of 46 ethics violations while in office…46 !!! And he STILL didn’t resign ! He left his wife and mother of his kids for a reporter, and then left that reporter for another reporter. Again while still in office.
Seriously, you need to commit murder or something to get booted.
[quote]smh23 wrote:
All presidents lie. Sometimes it is about getting their dick sucked and other times it is about covert bombing operations. I prefer the former.[/quote]
Oh, here we go…
Lying under oath = repeating intellegence information that every agency in the world believed to be true. Yeah, those are exactly the same.
Bush Derange Syndrome is hard to cure.
[quote]reddog6376 wrote:
[quote]smh23 wrote:
All presidents lie. Sometimes it is about getting their dick sucked and other times it is about covert bombing operations. I prefer the former.[/quote]
Oh, here we go…
Lying under oath = repeating intellegence information that every agency in the world believed to be true. Yeah, those are exactly the same.
Bush Derange Syndrome is hard to cure.[/quote]
I wasn’t referring specifically to Bush. Every president in recent memory has lied about war (Clinton and Obama included). War–in which lives are at stake, some of them American. That’s worse, to me, than lying about copping dome.
[quote]smh23 wrote:
[quote]reddog6376 wrote:
[quote]smh23 wrote:
All presidents lie. Sometimes it is about getting their dick sucked and other times it is about covert bombing operations. I prefer the former.[/quote]
Oh, here we go…
Lying under oath = repeating intellegence information that every agency in the world believed to be true. Yeah, those are exactly the same.
Bush Derange Syndrome is hard to cure.[/quote]
I wasn’t referring specifically to Bush. Every president in recent memory has lied about war (Clinton and Obama included). War–in which lives are at stake, some of them American. That’s worse, to me, than lying about copping dome.[/quote]
In my book, having the highest law-enforcment officer in the nation lie under sworn oath, buts him in a special level of hell.
[quote]MaximusB wrote:
Greeny,
I don’t even think anything would change if this shit happened before he was elected. You have polls showing that he is STILL considered a viable candidate for NY mayor. When guys like this are not booted and/or not reelected, other realize that there is some kind of grace for them should they (more like when they) fuck up to this level of magnitude.
Our mayor of Los Angeles was found guilty of 46 ethics violations while in office…46 !!! And he STILL didn’t resign ! He left his wife and mother of his kids for a reporter, and then left that reporter for another reporter. Again while still in office.
Seriously, you need to commit murder or something to get booted. [/quote]
I agree with this. According to a poll 56% of registered voters in his district think he should stay in office.
Of course, Ted Kennedy had the lovely Chappaquiddick incident where he accidentally killed a woman…“Kennedy gave a statement to police saying that during the previous night Mary Jo Kopechne was his passenger when he took a wrong turn and accidentally drove his car off a bridge into the water. After pleading guilty to a charge of leaving the scene of an accident after causing injury, Kennedy received a suspended sentence.” If his name had been anything but Kennedy he might have been (BIG might have been) actually punished.
[quote]MaximusB wrote:
Greeny,
I don’t even think anything would change if this shit happened before he was elected. You have polls showing that he is STILL considered a viable candidate for NY mayor. When guys like this are not booted and/or not reelected, other realize that there is some kind of grace for them should they (more like when they) fuck up to this level of magnitude.
Our mayor of Los Angeles was found guilty of 46 ethics violations while in office…46 !!! And he STILL didn’t resign ! He left his wife and mother of his kids for a reporter, and then left that reporter for another reporter. Again while still in office.
Seriously, you need to commit murder or something to get booted. [/quote]
Did you ever consider that there is a growing portion of America that is tired of the SELF RIGHTEOUS REPUBLICANS controlling the direction of this country.One can only hope
IT does amaze me that you posted that he was a REAL PERVERT and then likening his actions to that of a murderer , truly Amazing stuff