[quote]John S. wrote:
[quote]Rockscar wrote:
PitBull…please defend him sending messages to a 17 year old girl. More to come I’m sure. How can anyone defend this scumbag in ANY way?
It’s not on CNN or MSNBC yet…
[/quote]
Damn beat me too it. [/quote]
Yes, MSNBC is instead headlining the Palin e-mail release and will probably headline 20-30 items in the next few weeks just on her…
[quote]Rockscar wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
[quote]MaximusB wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
Americans think it is their right to get involved with all aspects of some one’s life , He was GUILTY of flirting with consenting adults , shame on him , this is redickulust :)[/quote]
This is a guy who represent alot of people and responsibility, he should be above bullshit like this. How do we trust people with serious issues and policies when he can’t even keep his dick in his pants?
Would you want this guy as your representative Pitt? Would you trust him to make the wisest of decisions with proof of such stupidity ?[/quote]
That is what we have elections for , I do not know much about him , I would have to research his voting record to answer your question,
I would agree that posting Mr Happy on the internet was not the smartest thing one could do , but in his defense he thought he had the cover of privacy. Which I feel he does.
It would have been a little different if he was posting the picts. for everyone , he did not they were intended for a very small audience .
I have pictures of myself, and of others , the difference is I am a no body :)[/quote]
PitBull…please defend him sending messages to a 17 year old girl. More to come I’m sure. How can anyone defend this scumbag in ANY way?
It’s not on CNN or MSNBC yet…
[/quote]
I am so surprised, who would have thunk it 
A stupid, STUPID thing to do. If I were in that guy’s district, I’d find it very hard not to vote for someone else. BUT, so far we just have dick-pics sent to adults, right? (the above story was more suggestive than explicit). If (when?!?) it gets worse, I’ll probably end up thinking he has to go. For now, I just think he should be voted out.
[quote]MaximusB wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
[quote]MaximusB wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
Americans think it is their right to get involved with all aspects of some one’s life , He was GUILTY of flirting with consenting adults , shame on him , this is redickulust :)[/quote]
This is a guy who represent alot of people and responsibility, he should be above bullshit like this. How do we trust people with serious issues and policies when he can’t even keep his dick in his pants?
Would you want this guy as your representative Pitt? Would you trust him to make the wisest of decisions with proof of such stupidity ?[/quote]
That is what we have elections for , I do not know much about him , I would have to research his voting record to answer your question,
I would agree that posting Mr Happy on the internet was not the smartest thing one could do , but in his defense he thought he had the cover of privacy. Which I feel he does.
It would have been a little different if he was posting the picts. for everyone , he did not they were intended for a very small audience .
I have pictures of myself, and of others , the difference is I am a no body :)[/quote]
You represent you, Weiner represents a large number of people.
What do you think about him messing around with a minor?..
This man is close to catching a case. [/quote]
It would make me look at the situation a little harder , if in FACT he was texting a minor.I personally do not think he needs a defense, I would even go farther saying he is the victim
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
[quote]MaximusB wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
[quote]MaximusB wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
Americans think it is their right to get involved with all aspects of some one’s life , He was GUILTY of flirting with consenting adults , shame on him , this is redickulust :)[/quote]
This is a guy who represent alot of people and responsibility, he should be above bullshit like this. How do we trust people with serious issues and policies when he can’t even keep his dick in his pants?
Would you want this guy as your representative Pitt? Would you trust him to make the wisest of decisions with proof of such stupidity ?[/quote]
That is what we have elections for , I do not know much about him , I would have to research his voting record to answer your question,
I would agree that posting Mr Happy on the internet was not the smartest thing one could do , but in his defense he thought he had the cover of privacy. Which I feel he does.
It would have been a little different if he was posting the picts. for everyone , he did not they were intended for a very small audience .
I have pictures of myself, and of others , the difference is I am a no body :)[/quote]
You represent you, Weiner represents a large number of people.
What do you think about him messing around with a minor?..
This man is close to catching a case. [/quote]
It would make me look at the situation a little harder , if in FACT he was texting a minor.I personally do not think he needs a defense, I would even go farther saying he is the victim[/quote]
Oh…My…you have hit the wall dude. Now you’re just trolling for the f-k of it.
[quote]Gambit_Lost wrote:
A stupid, STUPID thing to do. If I were in that guy’s district, I’d find it very hard not to vote for someone else. BUT, so far we just have dick-pics sent to adults, right? (the above story was more suggestive than explicit). If (when?!?) it gets worse, I’ll probably end up thinking he has to go. For now, I just think he should be voted out.[/quote]
The fact is we do not know what the conversations were…and it will probably not be known. but still, this guy has proven a weasel liar and I would not care if this punk was a R or D…scumbag degenerates need to go.
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
[quote]MaximusB wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
[quote]MaximusB wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
Americans think it is their right to get involved with all aspects of some one’s life , He was GUILTY of flirting with consenting adults , shame on him , this is redickulust :)[/quote]
This is a guy who represent alot of people and responsibility, he should be above bullshit like this. How do we trust people with serious issues and policies when he can’t even keep his dick in his pants?
Would you want this guy as your representative Pitt? Would you trust him to make the wisest of decisions with proof of such stupidity ?[/quote]
That is what we have elections for , I do not know much about him , I would have to research his voting record to answer your question,
I would agree that posting Mr Happy on the internet was not the smartest thing one could do , but in his defense he thought he had the cover of privacy. Which I feel he does.
It would have been a little different if he was posting the picts. for everyone , he did not they were intended for a very small audience .
I have pictures of myself, and of others , the difference is I am a no body :)[/quote]
You represent you, Weiner represents a large number of people.
What do you think about him messing around with a minor?..
This man is close to catching a case. [/quote]
It would make me look at the situation a little harder , if in FACT he was texting a minor.I personally do not think he needs a defense, I would even go farther saying he is the victim[/quote]
Tell me what business a 46 yr old newly married man has with a 17 yr old.
[quote]MaximusB wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
[quote]MaximusB wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
[quote]MaximusB wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
Americans think it is their right to get involved with all aspects of some one’s life , He was GUILTY of flirting with consenting adults , shame on him , this is redickulust :)[/quote]
This is a guy who represent alot of people and responsibility, he should be above bullshit like this. How do we trust people with serious issues and policies when he can’t even keep his dick in his pants?
Would you want this guy as your representative Pitt? Would you trust him to make the wisest of decisions with proof of such stupidity ?[/quote]
That is what we have elections for , I do not know much about him , I would have to research his voting record to answer your question,
I would agree that posting Mr Happy on the internet was not the smartest thing one could do , but in his defense he thought he had the cover of privacy. Which I feel he does.
It would have been a little different if he was posting the picts. for everyone , he did not they were intended for a very small audience .
I have pictures of myself, and of others , the difference is I am a no body :)[/quote]
You represent you, Weiner represents a large number of people.
What do you think about him messing around with a minor?..
This man is close to catching a case. [/quote]
It would make me look at the situation a little harder , if in FACT he was texting a minor.I personally do not think he needs a defense, I would even go farther saying he is the victim[/quote]
Tell me what business a 46 yr old newly married man has with a 17 yr old.[/quote]
Is she hot?
[quote]Rockscar wrote:
[quote]Gambit_Lost wrote:
A stupid, STUPID thing to do. If I were in that guy’s district, I’d find it very hard not to vote for someone else. BUT, so far we just have dick-pics sent to adults, right? (the above story was more suggestive than explicit). If (when?!?) it gets worse, I’ll probably end up thinking he has to go. For now, I just think he should be voted out.[/quote]
The fact is we do not know what the conversations were…and it will probably not be known. but still, this guy has proven a weasel liar and I would not care if this punk was a R or D…scumbag degenerates need to go.[/quote]
Not to sidetrack but, Rock, did you see the Democratic mafia tried to pass a tax increase under the radar today? Fucking state senate tried to pass a 1 yr tax extension which failed, the Republicans held strong.
Next week, if a balanced budget is not passed, no legislator in Cali gets paid until a balanced budget is signed.
20 days and ALL our taxes drop if the Republicans can hold strong :)))))
[quote]orion wrote:
[quote]MaximusB wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
[quote]MaximusB wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
[quote]MaximusB wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
Americans think it is their right to get involved with all aspects of some one’s life , He was GUILTY of flirting with consenting adults , shame on him , this is redickulust :)[/quote]
This is a guy who represent alot of people and responsibility, he should be above bullshit like this. How do we trust people with serious issues and policies when he can’t even keep his dick in his pants?
Would you want this guy as your representative Pitt? Would you trust him to make the wisest of decisions with proof of such stupidity ?[/quote]
That is what we have elections for , I do not know much about him , I would have to research his voting record to answer your question,
I would agree that posting Mr Happy on the internet was not the smartest thing one could do , but in his defense he thought he had the cover of privacy. Which I feel he does.
It would have been a little different if he was posting the picts. for everyone , he did not they were intended for a very small audience .
I have pictures of myself, and of others , the difference is I am a no body :)[/quote]
You represent you, Weiner represents a large number of people.
What do you think about him messing around with a minor?..
This man is close to catching a case. [/quote]
It would make me look at the situation a little harder , if in FACT he was texting a minor.I personally do not think he needs a defense, I would even go farther saying he is the victim[/quote]
Tell me what business a 46 yr old newly married man has with a 17 yr old.[/quote]
Is she hot?[/quote]
No but I think Weiner’s cellmate might think he is… “you sure do have a purdy mouth…”
[quote]Gambit_Lost wrote:
A stupid, STUPID thing to do. If I were in that guy’s district, I’d find it very hard not to vote for someone else. BUT, so far we just have dick-pics sent to adults, right? (the above story was more suggestive than explicit). If (when?!?) it gets worse, I’ll probably end up thinking he has to go. For now, I just think he should be voted out.[/quote]
While on your payroll.
vic·tim/ˈviktəm/Noun
my god you suck pittbull.
[quote]MaximusB wrote:
[quote]Rockscar wrote:
[quote]Gambit_Lost wrote:
A stupid, STUPID thing to do. If I were in that guy’s district, I’d find it very hard not to vote for someone else. BUT, so far we just have dick-pics sent to adults, right? (the above story was more suggestive than explicit). If (when?!?) it gets worse, I’ll probably end up thinking he has to go. For now, I just think he should be voted out.[/quote]
The fact is we do not know what the conversations were…and it will probably not be known. but still, this guy has proven a weasel liar and I would not care if this punk was a R or D…scumbag degenerates need to go.[/quote]
Not to sidetrack but, Rock, did you see the Democratic mafia tried to pass a tax increase under the radar today? Fucking state senate tried to pass a 1 yr tax extension which failed, the Republicans held strong.
Next week, if a balanced budget is not passed, no legislator in Cali gets paid until a balanced budget is signed.
20 days and ALL our taxes drop if the Republicans can hold strong :)))))[/quote]
Dude, in Cali…we are f-d. We have tax tax tax representation. My rep is Tom McClintock…a rarity in ca. I live in the last bastion of morality and normalcy in Ca.
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
vic·tim/ˈviktəm/Noun
You mean yourself?
[quote]PB Andy wrote:
my god you suck pittbull.[/quote]
Phuck yew
[quote]Rockscar wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
vicÃ?·tim/ˈviktəm/Noun
You mean yourself?[/quote]
I do not understand , I am no victim , I am sure Wiener sent those photos to people that he thought would not use them against him, there was evidently some element of trust
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
[quote]MaximusB wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
Americans think it is their right to get involved with all aspects of some one’s life , He was GUILTY of flirting with consenting adults , shame on him , this is redickulust :)[/quote]
This is a guy who represent alot of people and responsibility, he should be above bullshit like this. How do we trust people with serious issues and policies when he can’t even keep his dick in his pants?
Would you want this guy as your representative Pitt? Would you trust him to make the wisest of decisions with proof of such stupidity ?[/quote]
That is what we have elections for , I do not know much about him , I would have to research his voting record to answer your question,
I would agree that posting Mr Happy on the internet was not the smartest thing one could do , but in his defense he thought he had the cover of privacy. Which I feel he does.[/quote]
Hey dumbass, he tweeted them. That’s how he got busted. He didn’t IM or email them, he f’ing tweeted them.
Being held responsible for your actions now means you are a victim?
In the words of Chad Ochocinco…Child Please.
[quote]reddog6376 wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
[quote]MaximusB wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
Americans think it is their right to get involved with all aspects of some one’s life , He was GUILTY of flirting with consenting adults , shame on him , this is redickulust :)[/quote]
This is a guy who represent alot of people and responsibility, he should be above bullshit like this. How do we trust people with serious issues and policies when he can’t even keep his dick in his pants?
Would you want this guy as your representative Pitt? Would you trust him to make the wisest of decisions with proof of such stupidity ?[/quote]
That is what we have elections for , I do not know much about him , I would have to research his voting record to answer your question,
I would agree that posting Mr Happy on the internet was not the smartest thing one could do , but in his defense he thought he had the cover of privacy. Which I feel he does.[/quote]
Hey dumbass, he tweeted them. That’s how he got busted. He didn’t IM or email them, he f’ing tweeted them.
[/quote]
Did he ever apologize to the camera man he called a jackass ? Or was it another reporter that he called a jackass ? Or was he still smug assuming he did no wrong.
Pitt, if you put out naked pics and you are a politician, you are stupid as fuck.