‘“We have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion,” wrote John Adams. "Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.’
It’s not hard to appreciate the wisdom of Adams in practical terms. A profoundly immoral people would be an unruly mob. Huge amounts of compulsive, often violent, force would be needed to maintain the most basic order.
The American Constitution is among the highest achievements of human enlightenment. It is not a cage designed to hold a nation of brutal savages. If we would live as free people, governed with the minimum possible degree of compulsion, we must strive to deal with each other in a moral way, because we have to trust each other.
How can a moral people suffer the presence of deeply immoral leaders?’ - John Hayward
[quote]reddog6376 wrote:
‘“We have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion,” wrote John Adams. "Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.’
It’s not hard to appreciate the wisdom of Adams in practical terms. A profoundly immoral people would be an unruly mob. Huge amounts of compulsive, often violent, force would be needed to maintain the most basic order.
The American Constitution is among the highest achievements of human enlightenment. It is not a cage designed to hold a nation of brutal savages. If we would live as free people, governed with the minimum possible degree of compulsion, we must strive to deal with each other in a moral way, because we have to trust each other.
How can a moral people suffer the presence of deeply immoral leaders?’ - John Hayward
[/quote]
So you find some one that lived in the 17th century to be a guiding force today ?
[quote]reddog6376 wrote:
‘“We have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion,” wrote John Adams. "Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.’
It’s not hard to appreciate the wisdom of Adams in practical terms. A profoundly immoral people would be an unruly mob. Huge amounts of compulsive, often violent, force would be needed to maintain the most basic order.
The American Constitution is among the highest achievements of human enlightenment. It is not a cage designed to hold a nation of brutal savages. If we would live as free people, governed with the minimum possible degree of compulsion, we must strive to deal with each other in a moral way, because we have to trust each other.
How can a moral people suffer the presence of deeply immoral leaders?’ - John Hayward
[/quote]
So you find some one that lived in the 17th century to be a guiding force today ?[/quote]
Yes, many of them. Along with one in particular that lived in the 1st century.
News coming from a credible news source…Weiner lied to Obama about this issue while on the phone. In other words, when Obama called Weiner about this mess, he used the same aggressive, deflective bullshit and told him a lie.
Note to politicians…if you lie to POTUS, you’re fucked beyond belief.
This guy is such a dirt bag, he will be black balled by the Democratic Party, and I don’t blame them. You lie publicly, you probably lied to the President, you lie to your wife, honestly how do you call yourself a man ?
The timing of this should have been closer to the 2012 election. How priceless would this have been to come out right before the election ? If Weiner stays, the better it is for the GOP.
Americans think it is their right to get involved with all aspects of some one’s life , He was GUILTY of flirting with consenting adults , shame on him , this is redickulust
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
Americans think it is their right to get involved with all aspects of some one’s life , He was GUILTY of flirting with consenting adults , shame on him , this is redickulust :)[/quote]
If an employee of yours took pictures of his Johnson on a company paid for cell phone, then sent said pictures using company bandwidth, all while on the company clock, you’d be ok with all that?
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
Americans think it is their right to get involved with all aspects of some one’s life , He was GUILTY of flirting with consenting adults , shame on him , this is redickulust :)[/quote]
I dont think that is dick pics really were the issue, if he were a French politican journalists would not care and if they would have his defense would have been “eh”, shrug and considered to be perfectly adequate.
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
Americans think it is their right to get involved with all aspects of some one’s life , He was GUILTY of flirting with consenting adults , shame on him , this is redickulust :)[/quote]
If an employee of yours took pictures of his Johnson on a company paid for cell phone, then sent said pictures using company bandwidth, all while on the company clock, you’d be ok with all that?[/quote]
I guess it depends on what my business is , is it a Bible Book store or a Male Escort Service
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
Americans think it is their right to get involved with all aspects of some one’s life , He was GUILTY of flirting with consenting adults , shame on him , this is redickulust :)[/quote]
If an employee of yours took pictures of his Johnson on a company paid for cell phone, then sent said pictures using company bandwidth, all while on the company clock, you’d be ok with all that?[/quote]
I guess it depends on what my business is , is it a Bible Book store or a Male Escort Service[/quote]
Try not to act like a ass. If you were paying him to do a job that did not entail advertising his penis…
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
Americans think it is their right to get involved with all aspects of some one’s life , He was GUILTY of flirting with consenting adults , shame on him , this is redickulust :)[/quote]
If an employee of yours took pictures of his Johnson on a company paid for cell phone, then sent said pictures using company bandwidth, all while on the company clock, you’d be ok with all that?[/quote]
I guess it depends on what my business is , is it a Bible Book store or a Male Escort Service[/quote]
Try not to act like a ass. If you were paying him to do a job that did not entail advertising his penis…[/quote]
I probably would not care , if I had some type of liability in it I may reprimand him , probably I would tease him would be the likely outcome
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
Americans think it is their right to get involved with all aspects of some one’s life , He was GUILTY of flirting with consenting adults , shame on him , this is redickulust :)[/quote]
If an employee of yours took pictures of his Johnson on a company paid for cell phone, then sent said pictures using company bandwidth, all while on the company clock, you’d be ok with all that?[/quote]
I guess it depends on what my business is , is it a Bible Book store or a Male Escort Service[/quote]
Try not to act like a ass. If you were paying him to do a job that did not entail advertising his penis…[/quote]
I probably would not care , if I had some type of liability in it I may reprimand him , probably I would tease him would be the likely outcome [/quote]
You’re a hell of a lot more wasteful with your money than I am. I have fired people for a lot less screwing around than this. If he did it on his own time with his own hardware & software, I wouldn’t care. But Weiner was doing this shit on my dime and needs to be fired and his pension jerked.
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
Americans think it is their right to get involved with all aspects of some one’s life , He was GUILTY of flirting with consenting adults , shame on him , this is redickulust :)[/quote]
This is a guy who represent alot of people and responsibility, he should be above bullshit like this. How do we trust people with serious issues and policies when he can’t even keep his dick in his pants?
Would you want this guy as your representative Pitt? Would you trust him to make the wisest of decisions with proof of such stupidity ?
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
Americans think it is their right to get involved with all aspects of some one’s life , He was GUILTY of flirting with consenting adults , shame on him , this is redickulust :)[/quote]
This is a guy who represent alot of people and responsibility, he should be above bullshit like this. How do we trust people with serious issues and policies when he can’t even keep his dick in his pants?
Would you want this guy as your representative Pitt? Would you trust him to make the wisest of decisions with proof of such stupidity ?[/quote]
That is what we have elections for , I do not know much about him , I would have to research his voting record to answer your question,
I would agree that posting Mr Happy on the internet was not the smartest thing one could do , but in his defense he thought he had the cover of privacy. Which I feel he does.
It would have been a little different if he was posting the picts. for everyone , he did not they were intended for a very small audience .
I have pictures of myself, and of others , the difference is I am a no body
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
Americans think it is their right to get involved with all aspects of some one’s life , He was GUILTY of flirting with consenting adults , shame on him , this is redickulust :)[/quote]
This is a guy who represent alot of people and responsibility, he should be above bullshit like this. How do we trust people with serious issues and policies when he can’t even keep his dick in his pants?
Would you want this guy as your representative Pitt? Would you trust him to make the wisest of decisions with proof of such stupidity ?[/quote]
That is what we have elections for , I do not know much about him , I would have to research his voting record to answer your question,
I would agree that posting Mr Happy on the internet was not the smartest thing one could do , but in his defense he thought he had the cover of privacy. Which I feel he does.
It would have been a little different if he was posting the picts. for everyone , he did not they were intended for a very small audience .
I have pictures of myself, and of others , the difference is I am a no body :)[/quote]
PitBull…please defend him sending messages to a 17 year old girl. More to come I’m sure. How can anyone defend this scumbag in ANY way?
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
Americans think it is their right to get involved with all aspects of some one’s life , He was GUILTY of flirting with consenting adults , shame on him , this is redickulust :)[/quote]
This is a guy who represent alot of people and responsibility, he should be above bullshit like this. How do we trust people with serious issues and policies when he can’t even keep his dick in his pants?
Would you want this guy as your representative Pitt? Would you trust him to make the wisest of decisions with proof of such stupidity ?[/quote]
That is what we have elections for , I do not know much about him , I would have to research his voting record to answer your question,
I would agree that posting Mr Happy on the internet was not the smartest thing one could do , but in his defense he thought he had the cover of privacy. Which I feel he does.
It would have been a little different if he was posting the picts. for everyone , he did not they were intended for a very small audience .
I have pictures of myself, and of others , the difference is I am a no body :)[/quote]
You represent you, Weiner represents a large number of people.
What do you think about him messing around with a minor?..
