The Oak, Nazi?

[quote]Kansky wrote:
I have nothing against him as a person, he has come here and accomplished all there is to accomplish, but changing the constitution, never, there was a reason it was written the way it was, when it was.[/quote]

Precisely. It was written that a foreigner could not hold the Presidency, because the founding fathers were afraid of an Englishman coming over, getting into the Whig party and taking over the country and giving it back to Great Britain.

As it is today, it’s an outdated form of protection. Arnie has great appeal. I am not worried that he’d become Pres and turn the keys over to Austria or Russia or Israel.

But he will not be Pres, so the whole thing is rather moot.

[quote]meangenes wrote:
What about this?[/quote]

GOD DAMNIT, I THINK JOHNY BRAVO DOES THAT POSE TOO!!

FACISTS!!!

(sarcasm)

[quote]Zap Branigan wrote:
Grimnuruk wrote:
Zap Branigan wrote:
Grimnuruk wrote:
http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/Arnold

Arnold has no intersts in nazism, no interests at all…

photoshop?

I guess so. I had just looked at this thread: http://www.T-Nation.com/tmagnum/readTopic.do?id=1723633 and thought their article on Arnold was hilarious so I threw it in here.

I wasn’t sure if it was from his State of the State Address.[/quote]

Nice.

[quote]Flow wrote:
meangenes wrote:
What about this?

GOD DAMNIT, I THINK JOHNY BRAVO DOES THAT POSE TOO!!

FACISTS!!!

(sarcasm)[/quote]

Sarcasm? Hardly.

wow, i highly doubt thats all true, but if it was, id vote for him. he a much safer bet to get in than david duke or john taylor bowles. kinda gives ya something to think about though.wouldnt it be great?

He makes a great point about Arnie wanting to be a dictator though. A man fantasizing about power? He must be unstable.

Just because he wants alittle power,hes going to be the next Hitler? Puh-lease.

[quote]mr_slick wrote:
Just because he wants alittle power,hes going to be the next Hitler? Puh-lease.[/quote]

I’d be surprised if the guy who made that video could honestly say he’s never had a similar thought. A can’t imagine a guy who has never at least considered how he would fix some social/political thing or another if he were made king.

[quote]orion wrote:
Waldheim was a member of the SA, not the SS, and he never joined them directly but a rider`s club he was a member of was joined as a whole with the SA, propably without his knowledge.So, in a time where it, as you say, was quite normal to join the party he never did.Never being part of the SS he did not take part in warcrimes, the question was if he knew about them and since he was part of his Generals staff meetings he very likely did. As to killing American soldiers, well, duh. So, he never was SS, not a nazi and never a war criminal which makes me wonder whatelse in this opinion piece is just plain wrong. As to your photo, it is too small to see who wears what uniform.[/quote]
First off, that video is a steaming pile, a clever steaming pile however (Yo Mama is right on this one)…You may have some info on Kurt I don’t so I’m willing to concede your points, since I have no doubt that Kurt was smeared and lied about by political enemies. However, either the photo is doctored, or Kurt is wearing the field gray with shoulder eagle of the Waffen SS, not the SA style dress uniform…

[quote]Schwarzfahrer wrote:
meangenes wrote:
What about this?

Yeah right, big evidence, showing off muscle is fascistic.[/quote]

How come Sergio, Ferrigno, Franco, Zane, Yates, Ronnie, Jay, Dex, Ruhl, Priest or hell any other highly famed bodybuilders never used this pose?

[quote]meangenes wrote:
Schwarzfahrer wrote:
meangenes wrote:
What about this?

Yeah right, big evidence, showing off muscle is fascistic.

How come Sergio, Ferrigno, Franco, Zane, Yates, Ronnie, Jay, Dex, Ruhl, Priest or hell any other highly famed bodybuilders never used this pose?[/quote]

Aren’t you forgetting that little guy who did the pose in Gold’s in Pumping Iron? Doesn’t he count???

I wish guys would still to the vacuum occasionally when they pose :frowning: