Oh, that’s right, I forgot where I was.
“The gummint’s evil, can’t be trusted! Anarchy rules! Looneytarians unite! Let’s all meet up after our group therapy session!!!”
That’s more like it, I reckon.
You have no proof he lied. Zero. Zilch. Nada.
Completely ridiculous assertion refuted by both democrats and republicans.
For real…
Apparently you are not keeping up with the discussion. As I originally told you I do not trust any politician of either party. I have good reason not to both sides have continually disappointed me. Is that “feeling” or reason? Now add to that the Clintons have virtually made Leon Panetta. Now add to that the fact that there was motive to lie and to cover-up as I describe above.
Also, my original statement was no dodge. I have been reading your debate with Push and you are certainly not doing well. Just an observation on my part don’t go all to pieces. Sometimes you are far too fragile.
[quote=“thunderbolt23, post:1942, topic:212571, full:true”]
Oh goodie, we have Judgel Jeanine to set us right on the facts.[/quote]
Well, like I said she is a bit obnoxious. But she is a Judge are you? And she did get her law degree before that. Where did you get your law degree?
Tell me in your world is everyone who is on TV unworthy of your respect oh great one of T Nation. LOL.
Like I said a while back you used to be a force around here. You had facts and presented them well. Then suddenly I am guessing your life took a turn for the worse. Okay maybe not but something happened and now you are…well let’s just say…you are pitiful.
One more really good example of sarcasm over facts. Just outright belligerence in the face of a strong argument against yours.
Another fail on your end.
You are correct I do not have proof that Leon Panetta lied to cover up Hillary Clinton’s really bad foreign policy move. But I do have good evidence which I have presented to you. You can disagree with it as I said. No harm, no big deal and I don’t really care.
This is an honest question, why in your mind do you think her 4 years as a judge in Westchester County gives her the authority to speak on the Benghazi attack?
Give it a rest - this line is getting threadbare. You’ve tried this line before, and you know I rarely access Wikipedia, and it ain’t the font of what I know. And I’m not one to pat myself on the back, but I’ve read more books than your church has burned.
When the United States Air Force Historical Division puts together an analysis of whether the attack was justified (link below), as much as you looooooove ad hominem, the usual looneytarian ad hominem isn’t going to cut it. Nor is citing to one person somewhere who happens to think something different than the report.
Like I said, if you’re going to do what you typically do and cite fringe sources of “alternative history” - not interested. If all you got is attempting to discredit a public report on the basis that it happens to be assembled by a public body (in this case, the US military), then I will chuckle at your expense and sell you a ton foil hat.
LOL Too Funny Push…love the Beach Boys.
Aforementioned link:
http://www.afhso.af.mil/shared/media/document/AFD-110208-030.pdf
Yeah, guess I’m no longer a “force” here on PWI according to Zeb. I’ll try to find a way to sleep tonight.
Say, you didn’t answer my question - is Judge Jeanine also the author of the email updates you plagiarize and try and pass off as fact?
Or is that a different author?
That is a fair question. My retort: Why in your mind do you think that you have the authority to speak on the Benghazi attack? And for that matter why do I have the authority to speak on the Benghazi attack?
Why does anyone other than Obama, Clinton and Panetta have the authority to speak on the Benghazi attack?
As I said I have no problem with you accepting Obama/Clinton and Panetta’s argument. But, as you know there are a large group of people of every walk of life who do not believe their rendition of the truth.
It was a simple reporter who brought down Nixon. I wonder did he have the authority, the knowledge the high office to question such things?
You know what they say, when your argument is weak attack the other person’s sources.
Judges who happen to have their own television show are certainly not nearly as smart and learned as the great TB T Nation wonder boy.
And for heaven sakes none of Push’s sources could possiblly stand up to yours.
LOL
I don’t. That’s why I cited Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta and House Armed Services chairman Buck McKeon, for example.
That’s a pretty bush league dodge, btw.
I never said others can’t. You didn’t give anyone else except the 1 star (forget the name) that said we “may” have been able to help.
Ya, with proof.