You ignored the myriad of Trump’s liberal view points I posted, but I’m supposed refute your garbage post line by line. Typical.
There’s no more ignore function as far as I can tell or trust me you’d be on it.
1 Like
These “I’m more _______ (principled,conservative,what ever the flavor of the day) than you” things are funny. Kinda like when we were kids and trying to out punk each other. It culminated in a bunch of dumbshits listening to crappy music and thinking that each of us was cooler than the next guy.
Strikingly similar, this election cycle is.
It’s not about more or less for me. It’s simply about having principles and sticking to them. If you have a set of principles you believe in and live your life by you don’t cave when the going gets tough or sacrifice said beliefs to justify backing a clown.
Zeb doesn’t like that because that’s not the type of person he is. He pretends to be principled until it gets too tough.
Talk is cheap.
*edited
No actually I posted a very lengthy and well thought out post regarding people like yourself who would rather stay home or vote for a third party candidate. I also explained why most elected to the Presidency actually try to do what they promised (even Obama closing Gitmo). But, you ignored the entire post. Perhaps you had no response, were confused who knows?
As for Trump’s prior liberal views I agree so there is no argument there. However, they are his “prior” views. He says he has changed his views. Has he? I have no idea. But (as I already told you) we know where Hillary Clinton stands. So, maybe just maybe Trump has changed his views. He’s certainly at the bottom of my list but still far ahead of Hillary the incompetent liar.
Anyway as for ignoring me it’s actually pretty easy if you have an ounce of discipline. As soon as you see my name you simply skip it and go to the next post.
Glad I could help you.
ZEB
I already schooled you on principals. Want the abbreviated version?
-
Hillary will appoint liberal justices who will do the opposite of what you want. They will spit on your principals. Tell me now precisely how does that help promote your “principals”?
-
When you refuse to vote for one of the two party candidates you are in essence saying “I want others to choose because I just don’t like either one so I am opting to relinquish my responsibility.” So…one of the two gets elected and you have no say- Principals? Hmm…
As for me, my principals are quite transparent. I will vote for the most conservative candidate in the race whom I believe can actually win. Clear enough? And once again we know Hillary isn’t conservative at all. So this one is a no brainer. Not one ounce of her flabby old body is conservative. She is a left wing loon and worse yet she is a left wing loon who is for sale! As crooked as a dogs hind leg to quote one of my grandfathers old expressions.
Back to you. By not voting against her you are in fact helping her get elected. So you’re helping someone who is diametrically opposed to your core principals. Think about that for a while. As for Trump he might put forth some conservative legislation and appoint conservative judges and keep his word about tax cuts and I told you why twice now I won’t bother to do it again.
Being a purist, like yourself, means that in many cases you are an all or nothing person. And that means that many times you will get nothing! And in this case you will get something even worse than “nothing”. In this case you will be helping elect (by not voting against her) someone who opposes your very core principals, but I’ve already explained that to you as well didn’t I? Quickly again, you actually detest, liberal judges, planned parenthood, big government, etc. Hillary WILLgive you that Trump has promised not to, yes I know he still may, but again Hillary PROMISES to give those things to you. Simple right?
Okay, I think that’s it so ignore me or don’t ignore me you and I both know that it doesn’t matter.
ZEB
I can’t afford principles when it comes to politics, and apparently neither can any politicians. So if they can’t, who can?
How about the mega-fucking rich guy? He has fuck you money to the 3xtent that he can fund his own campaign and rub the noses of people who look at us as a source of revenue in it.
You’ve shown time and time again that you don’t understand the rudimentary facts regarding the incident. I won’t waste my time with such dross.
Enough to make me spit up beer on my computer
1 Like
Am I the only one who feels like I keep being told the Republican race is over, when it isn’t?
And that there is supposedly a Democratic race, when there has never been one?
Trump or Clinton?
/Fuck you 20 chars
Is it just me or are there an awful lot of Trump advocates now pushing to “unite” the republican party behind the elected candidate?
Since the rise of Trump there has been a substantial backlash against Trump inside the republican party and it was always been known that a large segment would not vote for him in a general election.
As for deciding between Trump and Hilary I would probably lean towards Trump but I’m seriously considering voting for Hilary out of shear spite, most likely my vote would go to an independent however. Granted I was only a kid for much of the original Clinton era but my impression was that she was always just a politician and more or less rode the democratic/liberal wave as it suited her. For Trump I see him doing the same thing on the republican side but don’t see any reason to believe that he shares the Conservative values I hold. The fact that he seems to be hijacking the conservative party is really what irks me. If he was to back up his rants with actual solid plans and was able to communicate his agenda with logical reasoning than it might persuade me but I have not seen anything close yet.
Trump isn’t a Republican by any measure of the Republican party today.
That’s why the Republican establishment finds it really dumb that Trump may become the presidential nominee of the Republican party.
Right, none of us know where Trump is really heading with all of this. But, we do know what he is saying. And if he does what he says we will be okay. Whereas if Hillary does what she says well…let’s just say it’s a third Obama term.
I’m still pulling for Rubio and it’s not over yet…
Former CIA director: Military may refuse to follow Trump’s orders if he becomes president
The reasons why Trump is decidedly unfit to become commander and diplomat in chief are many.
1 Like
He says he’s a Republican, though, so we’ll just ignore this…
LOL…we are just coming off of over 7 years of the most unfit individual to ever hold the highest office in the land. And…everyone followed orders quite nicely. They will do so regardless of who is elected to the Presidency. Even Hillary Clinton…Whahaha
But you are funny keep them coming.
Bis, I liked that. You know why? Because fear mongering speculation is a sure sign of weakness.
Did Obama vow to order the military to carry out blatantly illegal acts (read war crimes) when he campaigned in 2008 and 2012? US military personnel know to disobey unlawful orders.
Regardless, your post is a non-sequitur. This discussion concerns the qualifications of the 2016 presidential candidates. Your inability to admit to Trump’s staggering incompetence in the realm of international affairs and national security policy is indicative of your own staggering incompetence. If you’re openly calling for the US military to commit war crimes and don’t have the faintest understanding of international economics or the nuclear triad, you are grossly unqualified to become president of the United States.
Weakness? From Hayden, a retired four star general and former Director of the National Security Agency, Principal Deputy Director of National Intelligence, and Director of the Central Intelligence Agency? From me?
For all his blustering and ignorant appeals to “strength”, Trump is weak: intellectually and morally. He has neither the ability nor the temperament to be POTUS. He poses a remarkable threat to the GOP, the Republic, and her standing in the world.