The Next President of the United States: II

[quote]ZEB wrote:
Sure you can make the guy who owns 5 health food stores pay their bottom tier people $15 an hour instead of $9 or $10. But you must realize that the owner of those 5 stores is going to pass that expense on to his customers. So instead of paying $3.00 for a natural yogurt you are going to pay $4.00 for the exact same product. Then when you decide you need new tires for your car the normal cost of say $200 a tire will now be $250 per tire.
[/quote]

Pricing is ultimately dictated by the consumer, not the owner. If the consumer was willing to pay $4.00, the owner would already have his pricing there. Your argument only holds true for products where the margin is so tight across the entire market that all sellers must raise prices.

[quote]tedro wrote:

[quote]ZEB wrote:
Sure you can make the guy who owns 5 health food stores pay their bottom tier people $15 an hour instead of $9 or $10. But you must realize that the owner of those 5 stores is going to pass that expense on to his customers. So instead of paying $3.00 for a natural yogurt you are going to pay $4.00 for the exact same product. Then when you decide you need new tires for your car the normal cost of say $200 a tire will now be $250 per tire.
[/quote]

Pricing is ultimately dictated by the consumer, not the owner. If the consumer was willing to pay $4.00, the owner would already have his pricing there. Your argument only holds true for products where the margin is so tight across the entire market that all sellers must raise prices.[/quote]

That is what a minimum wage law does-folks are no longer permitted to work for less than the wage permitted by the holder of the monopoly on the initiation of physical violence in the place. If the consumer of labor was willing to pay $15 hour, the guy selling his labor for $9/hour would already be getting $15/hour. Minimum wage laws force people out of work, and that is their intended purpose.

[quote]tedro wrote:

[quote]ZEB wrote:
Sure you can make the guy who owns 5 health food stores pay their bottom tier people $15 an hour instead of $9 or $10. But you must realize that the owner of those 5 stores is going to pass that expense on to his customers. So instead of paying $3.00 for a natural yogurt you are going to pay $4.00 for the exact same product. Then when you decide you need new tires for your car the normal cost of say $200 a tire will now be $250 per tire.
[/quote]

Pricing is ultimately dictated by the consumer, not the owner. If the consumer was willing to pay $4.00, the owner would already have his pricing there. Your argument only holds true for products where the margin is so tight across the entire market that all sellers must raise prices.[/quote]

Well OBVIOUSLY if the consumer has a choice he or she is going to purchase an equal product at a lower price DUH!~!

[quote]sufiandy wrote:
What are the chances of a Clinton/Sanders ticket? That would be unbeatable, if its not 0% I would be a bit worried…[/quote]

A much better ticket is a Sanders/Warren ticket. This country needs something radical done not another status quo politician.

[quote]NickViar wrote:

[quote]tedro wrote:

[quote]ZEB wrote:
Sure you can make the guy who owns 5 health food stores pay their bottom tier people $15 an hour instead of $9 or $10. But you must realize that the owner of those 5 stores is going to pass that expense on to his customers. So instead of paying $3.00 for a natural yogurt you are going to pay $4.00 for the exact same product. Then when you decide you need new tires for your car the normal cost of say $200 a tire will now be $250 per tire.
[/quote]

Pricing is ultimately dictated by the consumer, not the owner. If the consumer was willing to pay $4.00, the owner would already have his pricing there. Your argument only holds true for products where the margin is so tight across the entire market that all sellers must raise prices.[/quote]

That is what a minimum wage law does-folks are no longer permitted to work for less than the wage permitted by the holder of the monopoly on the initiation of physical violence in the place. If the consumer of labor was willing to pay $15 hour, the guy selling his labor for $9/hour would already be getting $15/hour. Minimum wage laws force people out of work, and that is their intended purpose.[/quote]

Minimum wage laws force people out of work, and that is their intended purpose. Where is your proof? Not some right-wing economic talking point.

[quote]Alrightmiami19c wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:
http://observer.com/2015/08/a-bernie-sanders-shocker-is-coming/[/quote]

Article is a bit of a turd. I understand the author is a liberal (socialist), but come on.

“Meanwhile, Bernie Sanders calls for a free public college education for American young people, financed by a tiny tax on trading transactions on Wall Street.”
Define tiny.

“Meanwhile, while the GOP wages its obsessive war against Obamacare, and would rip away the insurance of Americans with pre-existing conditions and children now covered by the policies of their parents,…”

Children, like 26 years old?

“While the GOP debates pit Republicans who want to cut Social Security against Republicans who want to privatize Social Security and make the most successful government program in history a new profit center for Wall Street, Bernie Sanders wants to increase social security benefits for Americans.”

With what money? Massive tax increases?

Do his supporters think any of this shit through? Let me rephrase that. Do his supporters THINK?[/quote]

The tax is .05% on risky derivatives. Is that tiny enough for you?

Other countries have tax-financed college and healthcare. Other industrialized countries have this. How do THEY do it and somehow the U.S. can’t?

[quote]Zeppelin795 wrote:

[quote]sufiandy wrote:
What are the chances of a Clinton/Sanders ticket? That would be unbeatable, if its not 0% I would be a bit worried…[/quote]

A much better ticket is a Sanders/Warren ticket. This country needs something radical done not another status quo politician.
[/quote]

There is nothing I would like more than a Sanders/Warren ticket. The GOP would win in a landslide almost regardless of whom the republican candidate was.

Go Sanders/Warren!

Is there a place where I could donate?

[quote]Bismark wrote:

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:
Increase wages so all people that work live above the level that welfare pays
[/quote]

How?[/quote]

Every increase in the minimum wage has been followed by a decrease in the purchasing power of the lowest earners. It doesn’t serve employers, employees, or consumers. Pitt needs to understand the difference between nominal and real wages.[/quote]

Why do other industrialized countries have higher wages and better inclining economies than the U.S.?

[quote]Zeppelin795 wrote:

[quote]Alrightmiami19c wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:
http://observer.com/2015/08/a-bernie-sanders-shocker-is-coming/[/quote]

Article is a bit of a turd. I understand the author is a liberal (socialist), but come on.

“Meanwhile, Bernie Sanders calls for a free public college education for American young people, financed by a tiny tax on trading transactions on Wall Street.”
Define tiny.

“Meanwhile, while the GOP wages its obsessive war against Obamacare, and would rip away the insurance of Americans with pre-existing conditions and children now covered by the policies of their parents,…”

Children, like 26 years old?

“While the GOP debates pit Republicans who want to cut Social Security against Republicans who want to privatize Social Security and make the most successful government program in history a new profit center for Wall Street, Bernie Sanders wants to increase social security benefits for Americans.”

With what money? Massive tax increases?

Do his supporters think any of this shit through? Let me rephrase that. Do his supporters THINK?[/quote]

The tax is .05% on risky derivatives. Is that tiny enough for you?

Other countries have tax-financed college and healthcare. Other industrialized countries have this. How do THEY do it and somehow the U.S. can’t?[/quote]

Hey, I have an idea…

Why don’t we have the government pay for everything for everyone who makes less than 100-k per year. I mean everything! Food, shelter, medicine, alcohol, college, cars, vacations…you name it!

You like that Zeperoooo?

I have no idea where these people come from, what their parents taught them or even if they had parents…what schools they went to and the brain washing that took place there. I am totally mystified. The something for nothing school of shit thinking YEAH BABY!

[quote]Zeppelin795 wrote:

[quote]Bismark wrote:

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:
Increase wages so all people that work live above the level that welfare pays
[/quote]

How?[/quote]

Every increase in the minimum wage has been followed by a decrease in the purchasing power of the lowest earners. It doesn’t serve employers, employees, or consumers. Pitt needs to understand the difference between nominal and real wages.[/quote]

Why do other industrialized countries have higher wages and better inclining economies than the U.S.?[/quote]

Do you have sources for this? I’d like to read more

[quote]ZEB wrote:

[quote]tedro wrote:

[quote]ZEB wrote:
Sure you can make the guy who owns 5 health food stores pay their bottom tier people $15 an hour instead of $9 or $10. But you must realize that the owner of those 5 stores is going to pass that expense on to his customers. So instead of paying $3.00 for a natural yogurt you are going to pay $4.00 for the exact same product. Then when you decide you need new tires for your car the normal cost of say $200 a tire will now be $250 per tire.
[/quote]

[quote]tedro wrote:

[quote]ZEB wrote:

[quote]tedro wrote:

[quote]ZEB wrote:
Sure you can make the guy who owns 5 health food stores pay their bottom tier people $15 an hour instead of $9 or $10. But you must realize that the owner of those 5 stores is going to pass that expense on to his customers. So instead of paying $3.00 for a natural yogurt you are going to pay $4.00 for the exact same product. Then when you decide you need new tires for your car the normal cost of say $200 a tire will now be $250 per tire.
[/quote]

Pricing is ultimately dictated by the consumer, not the owner. If the consumer was willing to pay $4.00, the owner would already have his pricing there. Your argument only holds true for products where the margin is so tight across the entire market that all sellers must raise prices.[/quote]

Well OBVIOUSLY if the consumer has a choice he or she is going to purchase an equal product at a lower price DUH!~!
[/quote]

You and Nick are both making the assumption that a raise in the minimum wage will actually result in a real increase in the wages of those buying a given product, and thus turning into nothing more than an inflation spike.

In all likelihood the minimum wage increase will have no effect on the vast majority of wages in America. For those that do see an increase, there will be an equal number seeing a decrease via reduced hours, reduced benefits, or unemployment. Fast food restaurants today are glorified vending machines. There is plenty of equipment ready to be implemented today that would replace plenty of workers, but it’s not currently economically viable. It’s easier to pay a few hamburger flippers $8/hour than it is to pay a maintenance man $30. Ditto for all of the self-checkout lanes we see today.

Raising the minimum wage is more likely to decrease the marginal purchasing power than increase it. Products like “natural yogurt” were never going to be affected in the first place. Those consumers aren’t working for minimum wage. Same for the $30/hour maintenance man. He can afford a few luxuries already.

There is enough competition today for basic necessities that price is based almost exclusively on demand. Producers will continue to produce under a higher wage environment with very little long term operational cost increases. The demand for superior goods does not come from the minimum wage population. Producers of some of those products may be forced to take lower margins, but it will not affect the price. In those cases it will amount to nothing more than a wealth transfer, but the market for superior goods does not typically depend on many minimum wage workers.[/quote]

Did you read my last post? I think I said pretty much what you said here. I believe that the intent of minimum wage laws is to force those in the least valuable jobs completely out of work.

A rise in the minimum wage can only be accomplished by inflation(making the rise pointless), reduction in employment(leaving most minimum wage workers worse off than before), or raising the prices of products associated with the labor of minimum wage workers(either reducing consumption of those products and leading to the elimination of many of those jobs-I.e., scenario two-, or accomplished by inflation-scenario one). There is just no other possibility.

I would love to hear how anything else is possible, from those who feel(this is the correct word because they are definitely not thinking) differently.

McDonalds testing out touchscreen self-serve kiosks…

[quote]MaximusB wrote:
McDonalds testing out touchscreen self-serve kiosks…

http://www.businessinsider.com/what-self-serve-kiosks-at-mcdonalds-mean-for-cashiers-2015-8[/quote]

That would be a real hoot Max. Big government forces a higher minimum wage and then massive layoffs ensue because fast food has figured out a way around paying forced government wages.

[quote]MaximusB wrote:
McDonalds testing out touchscreen self-serve kiosks…

http://www.businessinsider.com/what-self-serve-kiosks-at-mcdonalds-mean-for-cashiers-2015-8[/quote]

Minimum wage proponents always dismiss this stuff but technology on this is getting so good and everyone knows how to use a touch screen these days that this can improve customer experience regardless of costing more or less than a cashier employee.

[quote]ZEB wrote:

[quote]MaximusB wrote:
McDonalds testing out touchscreen self-serve kiosks…

http://www.businessinsider.com/what-self-serve-kiosks-at-mcdonalds-mean-for-cashiers-2015-8[/quote]

That would be a real hoot Max. Big government forces a higher minimum wage and then massive layoffs ensue because fast food has figured out a way around paying forced government wages.[/quote]

What’s worse is that here in LA, unions pushed hard to pass the higher minimum wage. Then once it passed, they pushed for an exemption to it, trying to entice workers to unionize and expand their membership, who then bribe the legislature for more perks.

[quote]Zeppelin795 wrote:

[quote]sufiandy wrote:
What are the chances of a Clinton/Sanders ticket? That would be unbeatable, if its not 0% I would be a bit worried…[/quote]

A much better ticket is a Sanders/Warren ticket. This country needs something radical done not another status quo politician.
[/quote]

Fuck that.

[quote]sufiandy wrote:

[quote]Zeppelin795 wrote:

[quote]Bismark wrote:

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:
Increase wages so all people that work live above the level that welfare pays
[/quote]

How?[/quote]

Every increase in the minimum wage has been followed by a decrease in the purchasing power of the lowest earners. It doesn’t serve employers, employees, or consumers. Pitt needs to understand the difference between nominal and real wages.[/quote]

Why do other industrialized countries have higher wages and better inclining economies than the U.S.?[/quote]

Do you have sources for this? I’d like to read more[/quote]

This ought to be rich, as usual.

I know it’s Bernie , an old guy with funny hair

BErnie worship, the new Ron Paul worship…

Those evil rich people.