[quote]Uncle Gabby wrote:
rainjack wrote:
Uncle Gabby wrote:
If you want to eat meat, there are plenty of humane options out there. It costs an extra dollar, but I think it’s worth it.
You are killing animals and eating their flesh. Why must one worry about the humanity in how the animal died?
I have to wonder how many of you have actually been to a slaughter house, and been on the kill floor. I’d wager that about 99.9% of you have only seen the PETA version of slaughtering animals.
Cattle are killed and processed in the most efficient manner possible. This is the most “humane” method possible. Why? Because undo stress on the animal results in bad tasting beef.
Regardless of what PETA wants you to think, there is no money to be made in cruelty.
I really don’t care how the animals are killed. It’s a business, I’m sure the slaughter house doesn’t pay their people to beat animals to death with their shoes. Nor do subscribe to PETA’s version of anything. I thought I made that clear.
When I said Humane options, I was talking about how the animals lived, not died. In my opinion Free range is more humane than being locked in a cage their entire life.
[/quote]
Al cattle live the lion’s share of their lives on ranches eating grass and frolicking in the butterfly strewn meadows.
When they are a year old they are moved to feedlots, and kept in pens ranging in size from several thousand square feet to well over an acre.
It’s not butterfly meadows, but it’s not inhumane. They are there to gain 3-4 pounds a day, and then they are slaughtered.
Most cattle are only in the feedlots for 120 days, max.
Even when farmers feed their own steers out for personal consumption, they will move the animal into a pen where he pretty much eats, sleeps, drinks, and craps. Confining animals for finishing is not inhumane, nor is it a tool used exclusively by the evil corporations. It has been done for centuries.