Do you have a point?
All of your rambling is simply your way to avoid the reality that Islamic nations are primitive states run by despots and death cults. Stonings. Female genital mutilation. Pedophilia. Sex slavery. No civil rights or freedoms as we have in the West. Suicide bombing. Public executions. Killing people over perceived blasphemy. Have I missed anything?
And who named the region Palestine? It wasn’t the Arabs who call themselves Palestinians. It was called Palestine long before they invaded the region. Palestine is a land that was seized by a racist, anti-human and colonial Muslim project that was founded on the lunacy of a false prophet.
There’s a distinction without a difference if I ever saw one.
I guess Death To America means the country, not the people, too?
Its just that those pesky people Are The Fucking Country.
Its real simple. You don’t extend human rights to non humans, and if you aren’t an arabic man of a higher class, you aren’t human.
See? Just like that. No human rights violations here!
Tell them you don’t have a problem with Palestinians but Islam needs to go and see what they think.
Its just such a freakin 9 year olds idiotic attempt to find a loophole.
We’re supposed to believe this?
I just googled “Who are the biggest jews?” and it said that Canadians were.
So I think you have been deceiving me, which fits quite completely with what google said.
I’m sure the child suicide bombers they send into Israel make that distinction.
Can we have some agreed definition going forward?
Is it safe to say that any Jew who wants a “two state” solution is not a Zionist Jew?
But that would make the arguments way less interesting and more logical…
This is the internet - we can’t have that.
/sarcasm
The question is how does Hamas and their Iranian masters define it.
You can’t apply logic to fanatics.
If there is a two state solution who do think will be able to make that happen
My brother identifies as a zionist and vehemontly backs the idea of a two state solution
I don’t know whether i’d identify as zionist or not… but I back a two state solution
A two state solution without Hamas, the PLA, PLF etc
My utopian, fantastical idea is NATO gets involved and western intermediaries sieze control of Israel, Palestine and a good majority of the middle east
In a similar manner as to how western forces deradicalised nazi Germany and imperial Japan… western forces could deradicalise gazan citizens… topple/overthrow numerous tyrannical and oppressive middle eastern regiemes (and individuals within those populations who are radicalised) and curb ANY violence settlers occasionally inflict on palestinians and vice versa
Anyone who breaks peace and say… shoots a hundred rockets aimed at indiscriminately killing men, women and children or going to a music festival and mutilating, raping and killing indiscriminately would be punished severely i.e bombee into the ground or all perpetrators sentenced to death
Zero tolerance for hate crimes, religious fanaticism and religiously motivated violence
Put young people into deradicalisation programs… have them go to school amongst one another so the youth can see any conspiracies previously fed to them are lies
This approach would require an enormous amount of funding and effort to be put in and realistically may not be feasible.
But if this could be done in theory you’d have a united Israel/Palestine within 20-30 years
Back in the day no one could have imagined imperial japan turning secular
I can see that I need to find an acceptable definition of Zionism to try to understand the differing perceptions.
From Britannica: Zionism , Jewish nationalist movement that has had as its goal the creation and support of a Jewish national state in Palestine, the ancient homeland of the Jews
I can now see how a pragmatic Zionist can accept a two state solution as long as Israel is accepted as a state in the land that they can call their own as long as it lies within Palestine.
I have looked at Zionism as the the state of Israel be all of the land promised the Israelites as described in the Bible. The Christians (as I interpret the Bible) see this becoming a reality during the Millennial Kingdom. Pragmatically, this is not possible. It would take divine intervention.
Mr. Roarke.
yes
I don’t know. I read somewhere that it was the Romans. I think it was probably someone in Britain. Arabs call it Filasteen. Arabic doesn’t have a p letter/sound, that’s why the Arab accent sounds like “no broblem”, or “airblane”, they just substitute a b for a p. In this case it is an f, no substitution required.
“The Romans” might have named it, but I don’t think they all got together to agree on it. And I also remember learning that Goliath of “David vs Goliath” was a Philistine, and I’m pretty sure that was before the Romans. So it goes back pretty far.
What do you think it matters?
There are no Islamic nations, if there are any, it would be only one. I am aware that Muslims are doing very poorly worldwide
I didn’t come to T-Nation PWI to avoid anything, except sometimes work
Elaborate on this project please. What do you think made it racist, anti-human and colonial?
Can you give me an example of a human before the time of Muhammad (saw) that implemented more egalitarianism than he (saw) did?
Can you give me an example of a human before the time of Muhammad (saw) that removed racism more than he (saw) did?
That is because you insist on only looking at it from a very particular angle. It is a distinction which is significantly different from genocide of all Jews, everywhere - which people falsely identify with Hamas’ stated intents.
I think that in different contexts that could be sincerely interpreted either way.
Oh, ok. 
Well until they start making more selective bombs & bullets, and checking affiliation befor murdering people, they’re the same fucking thing.