Both are great, but Hulks fight tip it in my favor. He and Abom go at it. That’s how Wolvie and Sabretooth should have fought in X-men.
This movie was awesome, and Marvel has all but assured us that things are gonna get better. The only thing I can bitch about is that I thought the Hulk in Ang Lee’s version looked more realistic, and even then that’s not a big deal.
[quote]WhiteFlash wrote:
This movie was awesome, and Marvel has all but assured us that things are gonna get better. The only thing I can bitch about is that I thought the Hulk in Ang Lee’s version looked more realistic, and even then that’s not a big deal.[/quote]
But do you think it’s overrated?
[quote]WhiteFlash wrote:
This movie was awesome, and Marvel has all but assured us that things are gonna get better. The only thing I can bitch about is that I thought the Hulk in Ang Lee’s version looked more realistic, and even then that’s not a big deal.[/quote]
You do realize I am going to follow you around the forum and nitpick everything you write when it comes to film or television because of your Family Guy comment, right?
Ang Lee’s Hulk looked more realistic?
Did you leave your glasses at home?
[quote]WhiteFlash wrote:
I thought the Hulk in Ang Lee’s version looked more realistic[/quote]
Serially?
[quote]Makavali wrote:
WhiteFlash wrote:
I thought the Hulk in Ang Lee’s version looked more realistic
Serially?[/quote]
Ang Lee’s version isn’t horrible he just doesn’t look too menacing.
[quote]Pootie Tang wrote:
Ang Lee’s version isn’t horrible he just doesn’t look too menacing.[/quote]
That’s just it, the Hulk SHOULD be menacing by default, with layers of softness WITHIN.
[quote]Makavali wrote:
Pootie Tang wrote:
Ang Lee’s version isn’t horrible he just doesn’t look too menacing.
That’s just it, the Hulk SHOULD be menacing by default, with layers of softness WITHIN.[/quote]
I concur, I was saying that Ang Lee’s Hulk was more of the run away and commune with nature Hulk that shows up sometimes in comics. The Animation was great quality, just didn’t make you drop your jaw like the recent Hulk.
Side note: who directed Norton’s version?
[quote]AngryVader wrote:
WhiteFlash wrote:
This movie was awesome, and Marvel has all but assured us that things are gonna get better. The only thing I can bitch about is that I thought the Hulk in Ang Lee’s version looked more realistic, and even then that’s not a big deal.
But do you think it’s overrated? [/quote]
This is easily the best forum on the internet. No, I think it’s awesome. And to Prof.X, I think they did a great job with both, but I honestly think the last Hulk looked and moved a little better. That’s all off of memory though. I will see this again before it leaves the theatre.
And The Family Guy is overrated.
[quote]Makavali wrote:
WhiteFlash wrote:
I thought the Hulk in Ang Lee’s version looked more realistic
Serially?[/quote]
Ang Lee’s hulk has a bigger jaw line. He must be using HGH and those stee-roid pills. Cheater!
[quote]Pootie Tang wrote:
Makavali wrote:
Pootie Tang wrote:
Ang Lee’s version isn’t horrible he just doesn’t look too menacing.
That’s just it, the Hulk SHOULD be menacing by default, with layers of softness WITHIN.
I concur, I was saying that Ang Lee’s Hulk was more of the run away and commune with nature Hulk that shows up sometimes in comics. The Animation was great quality, just didn’t make you drop your jaw like the recent Hulk.
Side note: who directed Norton’s version?
[/quote]
It was directed by Louis Leterrier, who’s only other directing credit was Transporter 2. Weird, I just watched that on Friday. Must be some kind of weird movie association super power I have.
EDIT: I was wrong, he also directed Unleashed and The Transporter.
It was written by Zak Penn, who will be involved in the writing for both Captain America, The Avengers and Spy Hunter. He was also in involved with X2 and X3.
[quote]AngryVader wrote:
Pootie Tang wrote:
Makavali wrote:
Pootie Tang wrote:
Ang Lee’s version isn’t horrible he just doesn’t look too menacing.
That’s just it, the Hulk SHOULD be menacing by default, with layers of softness WITHIN.
I concur, I was saying that Ang Lee’s Hulk was more of the run away and commune with nature Hulk that shows up sometimes in comics. The Animation was great quality, just didn’t make you drop your jaw like the recent Hulk.
Side note: who directed Norton’s version?
It was directed by Louis Leterrier, who’s only other directing credit was Transporter 2. Weird, I just watched that on Friday. Must be some kind of weird movie association super power I have.
EDIT: I was wrong, he also directed Unleashed.
It was written by Zak Penn, who will be involved in the writing for both Captain American, The Avengers and Spy Hunter. He was also in involved with X2 and X3.[/quote]
Wow from Transporter 2 to this masterpiece. Norton most have kept him on track so we wouldn’t see anymore Audis driving on the roof of a building and magically making it back on to the ground in one piece.
[quote]AngryVader wrote:
Actually, if Liefeld did Hulk, he would end up looking like a green Cable. [/quote]
You know you have read too many comic books when as you fall asleep one of the odd thoughts floating through your head is a green Cable.
[quote]AngryVader wrote:
Pootie Tang wrote:
Makavali wrote:
Pootie Tang wrote:
Ang Lee’s version isn’t horrible he just doesn’t look too menacing.
That’s just it, the Hulk SHOULD be menacing by default, with layers of softness WITHIN.
I concur, I was saying that Ang Lee’s Hulk was more of the run away and commune with nature Hulk that shows up sometimes in comics. The Animation was great quality, just didn’t make you drop your jaw like the recent Hulk.
Side note: who directed Norton’s version?
It was directed by Louis Leterrier, who’s only other directing credit was Transporter 2. Weird, I just watched that on Friday. Must be some kind of weird movie association super power I have.
EDIT: I was wrong, he also directed Unleashed and The Transporter.
It was written by Zak Penn, who will be involved in the writing for both Captain America, The Avengers and Spy Hunter. He was also in involved with X2 and X3.[/quote]
I’m hoping Favreau gets Avengers for the director role.
I caught this last night and I’ve gotta say, I haven’t enjoyed a movie to that degree in quite some time.
I mean hell, I might even pick up a comic book.
But why did they have to make the villain an englishman? That’s so stereotypical, you sheep.
[quote]NeelyDan wrote:
I caught this last night and I’ve gotta say, I haven’t enjoyed a movie to that degree in quite some time.
I mean hell, I might even pick up a comic book.
But why did they have to make the villain an englishman? That’s so stereotypical, you sheep.[/quote]
Rimshot He’ll be here all weeks folks
[quote]NeelyDan wrote:
I caught this last night and I’ve gotta say, I haven’t enjoyed a movie to that degree in quite some time.
I mean hell, I might even pick up a comic book.
But why did they have to make the villain an englishman? That’s so stereotypical, you sheep.[/quote]
A Russian, raised in England.
You Fail @ Righteous Indignation.
[quote]NeelyDan wrote:
I caught this last night and I’ve gotta say, I haven’t enjoyed a movie to that degree in quite some time.
I mean hell, I might even pick up a comic book.
But why did they have to make the villain an englishman? That’s so stereotypical, you sheep.[/quote]
Seriously?
no…not seriously…
[quote]Backlash79 wrote:
NeelyDan wrote:
I caught this last night and I’ve gotta say, I haven’t enjoyed a movie to that degree in quite some time.
I mean hell, I might even pick up a comic book.
But why did they have to make the villain an englishman? That’s so stereotypical, you sheep.
Seriously?
[/quote]
You might want to go back and read the “Just Saw Iron Man” movie thread.