The French

Zeb,

What’s funny is that you think I am trash talking America. Should I say some things I don’t actually agree with or believe in to try and illustrate what that really does look like?

I don’t think I can. I wouldn’t even want someone to come along and take it out of context or find it via a search in the future and think it represented my thoughts or beliefs.

I know it is a “time or war”, but you seem to hold the US above reproach or above criticism. Your leaders are just people, not demigods, they too can do wrong. They too make mistakes, have private agendas and cause scandals. Relax, if not the current administration then previous adminstrations of both republican and democrat persuasion. Don’t mistake my statements for partisan politics.

I doubt your own media will give you a critical look into your own country. I don’t know if you’ve ever heard reasoned questions concerning US actions outside of a strongly political discussion. Maybe because you hardly ever hear it you mistake it for bashing? Gasp, your country has warts just like every other country. Hate to break it to you, but your politicians certainly don’t want to say anything negative to you.

Perhaps you react so strongly to my statements because they are emphatic and with conviction. This doesn’t mean they are fueled by hatred. Anger at being constantantly labelled or ridiculed doesn’t translate into hatred for the US, though it might heat up the language in a post from time to time.

Let’s see, I wonder what ultra-liberal means?

  • Are you implying I think that the US is in Iraq for oil? Bzzzt. Wrong.

  • Are you implying I think that the Bush administration has an agenda to turn the country into a Christrian Theocracy? Bzzzt. Wrong.

  • Are you implying that I think the US should immediately pull out of Iraq? Bzzzt. Wrong.

  • Are you implying that I am some type of peacenik appeaser? Bzzzt. Wrong.

  • Are you implying that I like big government and high tax rates? Bzzzt. Wrong.

  • Are you implying that I don’t see the danger that religious fundamentalism represents? Bzzzt. Wrong.

  • Are you implying I’m against free enterprise and pursuit of profits? Bzzzt. Wrong.

  • Are you implying I don’t believe in the American dream? Bzzzt. Wrong.

  • Are you implying that I’m Michael Moore’ian in some way? Bzzzt. Wrong.

  • Are you implying I disagree with the one and only correct viewpoint from time to time, namely yours? Ding Ding Ding. We have a winner.

Anyhow, until you can come up with something better than insults, and barely disguised reasons why I shouldn’t be allowed to say the things I say, such as it being Anti-American, or America-bashing, or ultra-liberal or some other obviously negative thing, I’m really not going to put much weight into what you think I should or should not be saying.

You attempt to discredit my statements by applying negative labels to me. You do that to others, such as RSU, and no, you are certainly not the only person that uses this tactic.

Anyhow, this is somewhat equivalent to chastising me for not being politically correct. If I am not mistaken you are firmly in the camp of thinking that the political correctness movement is an anathema? You are whining that I’m saying things that aren’t politically correct, from your point of view.

Try using reason. It has at least a chance of convincing me. Attacking me with labels won’t do it.

However, don’t take away the ultra-liberal label. Although the label itself doesn’t fit my beliefs it is a great icon to offer up to show the absurdity of your statements. It’s actually very funny – at least to me.

[ edited to fix omission of word “only” ]

War is bad. It should be avoided at all costs. This is not to say that it is ok to comprimize one’s morals, just that all other non-military options should be explored first.

This I know for a fact. I’ve been there. It’s unpleasant.

The French have a right, maybe even a responsibility to disagree with us. We should respect their position and agree to disagree with them.

They’ve made their fair share of blunders, remember Chad?

I have worked with the French military and they’re pretty good. They are professional and well-trained.

I have known quite a few French civilians and I have yet to meet one that isn’t friendly, personable and more than willing to help you.

RB

BTW, the two nations that had the largest effect on the outcome of the european theater were the US and the Soviet Union. The Soviet’s had a larger effect which does not diminish our involvement in any way. It is no more right to compare the heroic actions of the Soviet Union versus the US in WWII than to compare the contributions of Canada, the UK or any other nation. Everyone contributed in their own way.

Hitler’s Army died on the steps of Russia and his warfighting capability died under thousands of B-17 raids.

[quote]vroom wrote:
Zeb,

What’s funny is that you think I am trash talking America. Should I say some things I don’t actually agree with or believe in to try and illustrate what that really does look like?

No, you already have! Attempting to sell the idea to the young men of this forum that they have no right to national pride is a good starter.

I don’t think I can. I wouldn’t even want someone to come along and take it out of context or find it via a search in the future and think it represented my thoughts or beliefs.

I know it is a “time or war”, but you seem to hold the US above reproach or above criticism. Your leaders are just people, not demigods, they too can do wrong. They too make mistakes, have private agendas and cause scandals. Relax, if not the current administration then previous adminstrations of both republican and democrat persuasion. Don’t mistake my statements for partisan politics.

many of your statements that you make are wrapped around politics. Some are bolder than others. Some thinly disguised. I think it depends on the mood you are in. I also think anonymity gives you courage to do so!

I doubt your own media will give you a critical look into your own country. I don’t know if you’ve ever heard reasoned questions concerning US actions outside of a strongly political discussion. Maybe because you hardly ever hear it you mistake it for bashing? Gasp, your country has warts just like every other country. Hate to break it to you, but your politicians certainly don’t want to say anything negative to you.

Each of your posts usually has within it one particular phrase or paragraph that’s sort of …how do I say this politely? Um…far reaching and senseless. The one above captures the prize this time!

Do you think John Kerry questioned the war? “Wrong war wrong place wrong time.” Do you think Dan Rather, Tom Brokaw, Perter Jennings, the New York Times, CNN and other bastions of liberalism have attacked the President for his stand on various issues? Michael Moor! Wow vroom where have you been?

Perhaps you react so strongly to my statements because they are emphatic and with conviction. This doesn’t mean they are fueled by hatred. Anger at being constantantly labelled or ridiculed doesn’t translate into hatred for the US, though it might heat up the language in a post from time to time.

Yes, I know, everytime you write about your various liberal ideas, or the United States in a negative way you are “emphatic” and writing with “conviction.”

Let’s see, I wonder what ultra-liberal means?

  • Are you implying I think that the US is in Iraq for oil? Bzzzt. Wrong.

Never stated that.

  • Are you implying I think that the Bush administration has an agenda to turn the country into a Christrian Theocracy? Bzzzt. Wrong.

You might have implied that, not sure would have to check prior posts and quite honestly I don’t have the time right now.

  • Are you implying that I think the US should immediately pull out of Iraq? Bzzzt. Wrong.

I Never stated that.

  • Are you implying that I am some type of peacenik appeaser? Bzzzt. Wrong.

You have on occasion given that impression to me and others.

  • Are you implying that I like big government and high tax rates? Bzzzt. Wrong.

I never stated that.

  • Are you implying that I don’t see the danger that religious fundamentalism represents? Bzzzt. Wrong.

Ha ha I love the way you worded that one. Oh…I know you think that there is a danger regarding fundamental Christians. You don’t see a danger to our society relative to homosexuals marrying, or 70 million abortions being performed (most for convenience) But those darn Christians sure need a beating…yep that’s you vroom!

  • Are you implying I’m against free enterprise and pursuit of profits? Bzzzt. Wrong.

I never stated that.

  • Are you implying I don’t believe in the American dream? Bzzzt. Wrong.

At this point in time I have never read one word about your opinion of the “American dream.” So far, by your posts, I am guessing that you think America is a nightmare. That is the exact impression that you have given many of us. I would like to read about your “American dream.” In fact I wonder why the hell you are even in this country you seem to think it’s so awful!

  • Are you implying that I’m Michael Moore’ian in some way? Bzzzt. Wrong.

I honestly think you would have more in common with Moore than President Bush. Again, judging by your posts. I think Moore would be proud of the hatchet job you have done on the President, and on this country!

  • Are you implying I disagree with the one and only correct viewpoint from time to time, namely yours? Ding Ding Ding. We have a winner.

The very nature of this end of the forum is to debate. Does this offend you in some way? I think it goes deeper than that. There are many viewpoints on this forum. I have found some objectionable. However, I have never read any that appears so anti-American and ultra (or extreme your choice)liberal on a regular basis as yours are.

Anyhow, until you can come up with something better than insults, and barely disguised reasons why I shouldn’t be allowed to say the things I say, such as it being Anti-American, or America-bashing, or ultra-liberal or some other obviously negative thing, I’m really not going to put much weight into what you think I should or should not be saying.

You never put weight in anyones comments that disagree with your own. Why would you change now? Not one time to my recollection have you done such.

The fact that you don’t like being called an extreme liberal is understandable. I have never seen anyone enjoy being called a liberal. Liberals always run from that label. In fact, John Kerry ran from that label in the second debate with President Bush. That was amusing. The fact that you think being called a “liberal” is an “insult” is also amusing and I thank you for the laugh.

You attempt to discredit my statements by applying negative labels to me. You do that to others, such as RSU, and no, you are certainly not the only person that uses this tactic.

Again, the “negatvie label” to which you refer is being called a liberal! You think that’s a “negative tactic” Whaha… you have to appreciate the irony here folks. The liberal is mad because I have called him a liberal!

Anyhow, this is somewhat equivalent to chastising me for not being politically correct. If I am not mistaken you are firmly in the camp of thinking that the political correctness movement is an anathema? You are whining that I’m saying things that aren’t politically correct, from your point of view.

You are right and wrong here. I do think that political correctness is bad for America. However, you are in fact politically correct. I think you are the poster boy for political correctness. Just as most ultra liberals are. The funny part is that you think harping on America is not politically correct.

Try using reason. It has at least a chance of convincing me. Attacking me with labels won’t do it.

Again you run from the dreaded liberal tag. You can call me a conservative, I don’t mind. I am proud of my political bent and you are ashamed of your own…oh my.

However, don’t take away the ultra-liberal label. Although the label itself doesn’t fit my beliefs it is a great icon to offer up to show the absurdity of your statements. It’s actually very funny – at least to me.

I can’t take away what you are. ultra, or extreme liberal fits you! Only you can change vroom. It’s going to take lot’s of time and patience, but you can change if you really try. I suggest you begin by not taking yourself so seriously. I suspect not much is funny to you. I have always found that to be one trait of a liberal. McGovern, Dukakis, Gore, Kerry, Hillary (gag), and many other liberals all take themselves quite seriously. They also think the sun shines out of their butt.

You have a good tan vroom?

Dear T-Nation,

Please can you construct a Vroom vs. Zeb forum! Their ‘discussions’ are genuinely some of the most interesting and entertaining things on this site!

Zeb,

You are so full of shit your eyes are brown.

I guess the biggest mischaracterization in your post is that I am afraid of being termed a liberal. I don’t mind being termed a liberal, but I’m not an ultra-liberal. Are you a neoconservative? Are you a religious fundamentalist? Or, are you simply a conservative? There is a big difference, you sneaky bugger and you know it.

By the way, you really need to figure out how the quoting thing works one of these days.

One of the more interesting points was your interpretation of my statement concerning religious fundamentalism. Umm, do you think it might just be directed towards Islamofascists? Your interpretation of me is very slanted by your own beliefs, but that doesn’t mean you are characterizing me correctly.

As for your media and politicians, they are bashing each other, but none of them will ever dare say anything that could be construed as critical of the blessed US. You miss my point completely. The politicians and the media are very busy telling you what you want to hear about your country, any so called criticism is very sugared down and circumspect. I don’t think you will ever see this point, but it has nothing to do with nitpicking back and forth between two political ideologies or representative candidates.

I can get more detailed if you still have no concept of what I’m talking about here.

Anyhow, my take is you don’t like to hear the things I am saying. You don’t agree with my viewpoint. You’ve formed an opinion of me and it doesn’t matter what I say, you’ve already made your mind up. However, I don’t know why you seem to take everything so personally. It’s like a criticism of the president or the administrations policies is a direct personal attack on you.

This is where I was coming from when I said “my opinion is not me”. Of course, you missed the concept completely. The idea was for you to say this to yourself, so that when I disagree with your opinion, you realize that it is not a personal attack on you, just your opinion. You miss a lot of little things like that. You take this very personally and you get very mean towards people you see as very liberal or very in disagreement with your own viewpoint.

You know what, I see your attempt to characterize me as anti-American or an America hater as an attempt to “rally the troops” and get people against my viewpoint. If you want to make accusations, then go out and dig up some evidence.

As for anonymity, I have a picture up, I have my location up. It’s more than can be said for you. Yes, I’m still fairly anonymous, I know that. I also know full well I will face criticism when I post my comments. I spend time trying to word them correctly, so that I don’t inadvertently cross lines that I don’t intend to. I may still do so from time to time, and if you can point those occasions out to me, I will apologize.

However, no matter how much you cry and whine and mischaracterize me, I will not stop posting my opinion and my criticism of issues as I see them. You go ahead and do the same. I’d prefer if you did so without the personal attacks, but of course, that part is up to you. If that’s all you’ve got, then continue to go with it.

What part of standing up for what I believe in makes me an elitist?

Finally, and very importantly, though you missed it, as usual, I am not against national pride. However, expression of national pride does not require hatred of the French. You can have national pride for every single good thing the US has ever done, and the list is very long.

Did you notice that? That was a very positive comment. From time to time one of those sneaks in, but I don’t think you count them at all because it is nestled within a critical post.

This does not mean you should have disdain for everyone else. Having pride is an expression of internal satisfacation, not external dissatisfaction.

Maybe you cannot see the difference, but don’t mischaracterize me as being against Americans having pride in their own country and the actions of their own ancestors. That is just plain wrong. Pride is something you take, but honor and respect is something that is given to you.

I have great pride in Canada and the things that we have achieved, but I don’t have disdain for others because of that.

If the French are not giving you the honor and respect that you think you deserve, then tough luck. It is churlish to spurn them because they no longer consider you their heros, because they will not meekly accept your direction concerning world affairs.

Yes, I’m telling you, suck it up buttercup. Grow up. They don’t have to kiss your ass forever. You can take pride forever, but you can’t force others to respect and honor you or your country when they weren’t even alive to appreciate the actions in question. As I said before, they may choose to continue to bestow it, but that is their choice. Obviously, they’ll instead judge you by what they see as your more recent actions.

I guess they aren’t totally in favor. Of course, it is a matter of politics to determine why. Be aware, I am not stating or implying agreement with their position as perhaps an ultra-liberal might. They, and they alone, no longer judge the US worthy of their hero worship. It might hurt to lose that, but don’t blame me just because I’m pointing out how childish it is to hate them because they no longer worship you.

Next thing you know you’ll be claiming I’m against motherhood and apple pie. I don’t know how, but if there is a way to misinterpret something you’ll find a way to do it.

Based on the PM’s I get from Americans other than yourself, some people do appreciate my viewpoint and they can see the difference between analyzing or criticizing and hating. Discussing and considering issues is a vital step in deciding what course of action to take next. It is part of learning and growth. Nearly all viewpoints have something useful to add - if you can find it.

Look a little harder maybe?

SCC-

I’m reading a good WWI book right now called The First World War by Hew Strachan. Catchy name, I know, but it is good.

I got about halfway through a Stephen Ambrose book but did not finish it. For some reason I just couldn’t stand his writing style as it just seemed like a bunch of disjointed sentences to me. He sells a lot of books though, so I’m sure my opinion is in the minority.

Vroom and Zeb: Please allow me to offer both of you an opinion or two from a neutral viewpoint as I was born in Canada, but am a U.S. citizen, and have voted for Democratic and Republican nominees for President.

Vroom - When an outsider is critical of our country, you can expect nothing less than outright hostility from many U.S. citizens. This kind of reaction can happen when you’re standing on the outside looking in at a country, state, institution or even a family. For example; an old girlfriend of mine had a mother who was a constant pain in her ass. Not in the every day annoying way either, but in a really detrimental way. My X quite often would need to vent about her frustration with the situation. Of course I was there to listen, but the two times I offered my own not so favorable opinions of her Mother, my X came to her defense. Why? Because I was not part of the family. (Thank God I never became part of it either). This may seem very far afield of your opinions of the USA, but I think you can see the parallel.

There are people out there who really like nothing better than complaining about the USA. If it weren’t for us, I’m sure they would find something else to complain about to fill their days. I really don’t think that you are one of those people though. However if you want to be heard, and I mean really understood by more people on this board, let me offer a suggestion. When you critisize a certain action by the USA, follow it up with an example of something our government did do better at some point in time in a similar situation. That way, we’ll know that you actually do more than look for things to bitch and moan about.

Zeb - You told Vroom not to take himself too seriously. Although I don’t post much, I’ve been reading this site for about five years, so I’ve read many of your posts and I can tell you this: You are the last person that should be offering someone that advice. The tone of your posts indicates that you take yourself at least as seriously as Vroom takes himself, if not more. Maybe you don’t realize that, but at least IMHO, it is true.

DCB,

Thanks for your thoughts. I do see the parallels.

Anyway, I do know I’m seen as an outsider and I do expect to receive grief for it.

[quote]vroom wrote:
Zeb,

You are so full of shit your eyes are brown.

Well…good at least you are not at the point where you are insulting me personally because you are frustrated…oops guess you are…sorry :slight_smile:

I guess the biggest mischaracterization in your post is that I am afraid of being termed a liberal. I don’t mind being termed a liberal, but I’m not an ultra-liberal. Are you a neoconservative? Are you a religious fundamentalist? Or, are you simply a conservative? There is a big difference, you sneaky bugger and you know it.

For someone “who is not afraid of being termed a liberal” you sure do a lot of denying of the fact that you are a liberal. Yes…an extreme one at that!

By the way, you really need to figure out how the quoting thing works one of these days.

Yes, or I could go on making you read it in this manner :slight_smile:

One of the more interesting points was your interpretation of my statement concerning religious fundamentalism. Umm, do you think it might just be directed towards Islamofascists? Your interpretation of me is very slanted by your own beliefs, but that doesn’t mean you are characterizing me correctly.

It also doesn’t mean I am characterizing you incorrectly.

As for your media and politicians, they are bashing each other, but none of them will ever dare say anything that could be construed as critical of the blessed US. You miss my point completely. The politicians and the media are very busy telling you what you want to hear about your country, any so called criticism is very sugared down and circumspect. I don’t think you will ever see this point, but it has nothing to do with nitpicking back and forth between two political ideologies or representative candidates.

I can get more detailed if you still have no concept of what I’m talking about here.

Duh…we conservatives just can’t figure out what the heck you blue staters are saying…I think we are stupid…Haha. Oh wait…we just beat the pants off of your “intelligent” candidate. Guess we are smarter than you thought.

Seriously, you have to ask yourself why you feel it is your part time job to constantly criticize the US.

Anyhow, my take is you don’t like to hear the things I am saying. You don’t agree with my viewpoint. You’ve formed an opinion of me and it doesn’t matter what I say, you’ve already made your mind up. However, I don’t know why you seem to take everything so personally. It’s like a criticism of the president or the administrations policies is a direct personal attack on you.

Okay…you found me out! I am in fact President Bush! Seriously, I simply point out the fact that you are an extreme liberal who attacks the US whenever you get the chance. I don’t take that personally, but I will call you on it, as I have stated.

This is where I was coming from when I said “my opinion is not me”. Of course, you missed the concept completely. The idea was for you to say this to yourself, so that when I disagree with your opinion, you realize that it is not a personal attack on you, just your opinion. You miss a lot of little things like that. You take this very personally and you get very mean towards people you see as very liberal or very in disagreement with your own viewpoint.

Actually, I understood the phrase, but chose to make a joke of it as it seemed more important than to play your game. I am not at all “mean toward you.” I simply point out what your liberal anti-American rhetoric and if feels “mean” to you.

You know what, I see your attempt to characterize me as anti-American or an America hater as an attempt to “rally the troops” and get people against my viewpoint. If you want to make accusations, then go out and dig up some evidence.

Wrong again! I have never needed anyones help to speak my mind. The fact that others agree with me (and they do) is fine. I call them as I see them. You are an extreme liberal. See, I just did it again :slight_smile:

As for anonymity, I have a picture up, I have my location up. It’s more than can be said for you. Yes, I’m still fairly anonymous, I know that. I also know full well I will face criticism when I post my comments. I spend time trying to word them correctly, so that I don’t inadvertently cross lines that I don’t intend to. I may still do so from time to time, and if you can point those occasions out to me, I will apologize.

I think you have “crossed the line” on many occasions. As I have stated in a previous post if I had the time and desire I would go back, look them up and point them out to you. I may at some point anyway as this may enlighten you as to how you are perceived by many.

However, no matter how much you cry and whine and mischaracterize me, I will not stop posting my opinion and my criticism of issues as I see them. You go ahead and do the same. I’d prefer if you did so without the personal attacks, but of course, that part is up to you. If that’s all you’ve got, then continue to go with it.

Personal attacks? Like the sort you began your post with? All I have done is call you an extreme liberal, and you are. I am not “whining” about anything, that would be you your hearing. Nor am I mischaracterizing you. I am simply not allowing you to spill your extreme liberal propaganda, and to berate the US without being challenged.

Finally, and very importantly, though you missed it, as usual, I am not against national pride. However, expression of national pride does not require hatred of the French. You can have national pride for every single good thing the US has ever done, and the list is very long.

I never stated anywhere that we should hate the French and you know it. Now I would like you to name “every single good thing the US has ever done.” Okay, how about you start out with just three good things that the Bush administration has done. You pride yourself on seeing both sides of an issue so give it a try.

Did you notice that? That was a very positive comment. From time to time one of those sneaks in, but I don’t think you count them at all because it is nestled within a critical post.

I know you are a very negative person, you don’t have to convince me.

This does not mean you should have disdain for everyone else. Having pride is an expression of internal satisfacation, not external dissatisfaction.

Actually, it can be shown by both! When the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor I am sure there was plenty of external dissatisfaction with Japan, which fueld national pride.

Maybe you cannot see the difference, but don’t mischaracterize me as being against Americans having pride in their own country and the actions of their own ancestors. That is just plain wrong. Pride is something you take, but honor and respect is something that is given to you.

Call it what you will, when you post that my generation and the generation that came after me have no reason to have national pride because of what our Fathers and Grandfathers did, you are wrong! I would also suggest that most Americans would agree with me. Naturally, you don’t understand that having the political bent that you do.

I have great pride in Canada and the things that we have achieved, but I don’t have disdain for others because of that.

If the French are not giving you the honor and respect that you think you deserve, then tough luck. It is churlish to spurn them because they no longer consider you their heros, because they will not meekly accept your direction concerning world affairs.

Wrong, it is shortsighted for them to spurn us. The leaders of France are not thinking of the long term consequences of such actions.

Yes, I’m telling you, suck it up buttercup. Grow up. They don’t have to kiss your ass forever. You can take pride forever, but you can’t force others to respect and honor you or your country when they weren’t even alive to appreciate the actions in question. As I said before, they may choose to continue to bestow it, but that is their choice. Obviously, they’ll instead judge you by what they see as your more recent actions.

“Suck it up butter cup?” Haha. (you mightbe spending to much time on the forum). Well…I am not going to hop a plane and fly to France to beat anyone up. As I have stated they are acting short sightedly. I feel that I can better serve my country at this point by constantly reminding people like yourself to be more respectful of the country that you currently inhabit. And of course pointing out your liberal views.

I guess they aren’t totally in favor. Of course, it is a matter of politics to determine why. Be aware, I am not stating or implying agreement with their position as perhaps an ultra-liberal might. They, and they alone, no longer judge the US worthy of their hero worship. It might hurt to lose that, but don’t blame me just because I’m pointing out how childish it is to hate them because they no longer worship you.

I do blame you for this. I also blame you for the other anti-American sentiments you espouse on this board. Why is it always vroom who is pointing out where America went wrong? Why is it always vroom who takes the side of the left (yet still states he is not ultra liberal)? Why was it vroom who was attacking President Bush, yet had not a to many harsh words for John Kerry during the election? Why is it always vroom stating “don’t hate me because I am pointing out how I feel.” If a mass murderer claims he was just following his feelings is he not still guilty of murder?

Next thing you know you’ll be claiming I’m against motherhood and apple pie. I don’t know how, but if there is a way to misinterpret something you’ll find a way to do it.

Wrong again! I have never misrepresented you. You are an extreme liberal who would rather I not point it out. when I do point it out, you get a bit bent out of shape and claim I misrepresent you. It’s an ongoing sort of thing…

Based on the PM’s I get from Americans other than yourself, some people do appreciate my viewpoint and they can see the difference between analyzing or criticizing and hating. Discussing and considering issues is a vital step in deciding what course of action to take next. It is part of learning and growth. Nearly all viewpoints have something useful to add - if you can find it.

Look a little harder maybe?[/quote]

Yes…and everytime you “analyze and critique” it is usually liberal and anti- American. When you add up the total of your posts, which are full of this sort of thing, it starts to look like hate.

By the way, every PM that I have gotten on the subject of vroom has stated that you are an ultra liberal who is finally being called on it…and you hate it. And you know what? They are right on!

Too bad that is not something that I posted…

[quote]vroom wrote:
when you post that my generation and the generation that came after me have no reason to have national pride

Too bad that is not something that I posted…[/quote]

vroom:

Every other word out of your keyboard seems either anti-American or extreme liberal…I’m not even sure you know what your own posts say. Go look them up and get back to me.

Get back to me when you learn to read Zeb…

Get back to me when you actually become as intelligent as you think you are!

(Oh my this is getting nasty…but much shorter, which is less time consuming so there are some good things happening here as well :slight_smile:

Yeah, ditto on the shortness.

Zeb, you seem to continually miss the nuances of what I’m saying. If there comes a day where you want to discuss issues instead of apply labels and play politics, let me know.

Vroom:

You sort of remind me of the guy who lost a fight. He said later on: “Maybe you didn’t realize this but I was giving you left jabs.” Yea…so?

I made my point, you don’t like it, I didn’t expect you to.

(Now let’s not go any longer than 10 lines or so, okay? Oh…and I really appreciated your nuances)

Zeb,

Maybe that is the difference, you see this as some type of struggle. I see it as an opportunity to examine important issues of the day.

Perhaps pride, respect and honor do have different qualities and characteristics. That would have been an interesting conversation.

What exactly are you trying to win?

Sorry to jump in on this but I couldn’t resist, you guys are having all the fun. Anyways…

Vroom - “Zeb, you seem to continually miss the nuances of what I’m saying. If there comes a day where you want to discuss issues instead of apply labels and play politics, let me know.”

Why do you need to use nuances to make points, thats all like cloak and dagger stuff. we stupid americans would really appreciate if you would just bluntly say what you mean. We have thick skin and don’t care for people who beat around the bush, we don’t so why sould you eh?

This would also cut down on the amount of arguing over what you actually said, what it may have appeared you said and what you really meant though it may be hard to tell. Ya know?

vroom:

Anytime you debate with anyone there is a sort of ongoing “struggle.” That doesn’t mean that there has to be bad feelings between the parties.

It was a simple analogy, sorry if it threw you.

(looking around the thread) Since it seems to be only you and I having this discussion, I invite you to PM me if you would like to continue.

Zeb, when you want to struggle with facts or discuss issues, and not slap me with labels, I’ll be happy to continue.

You are trying to win, I’m trying to discuss some interesting issues. I may or may not be wrong, but slapping me with labels isn’t a productive way to find out.

Well…if it walks like a duck and talks like a duck…it’s a duck!

The fact is most of your posts lean way left. Hence the term “ultra liberal.” Now I tried to compliment you on one particular post that was actually not liberal and you bit my head off.

You are an odd duck.