The Fatkini

Off Topic
61

[quote]marrot wrote:
Meh.

She makes more money slingin those fatkinis than we ever could bitchin about em.

Haters mad because they can’t corner an entire niche market single handedly.[/quote]

Haters are mad because the niche market exists.

Look, I guarantee the quest to make bobs bigger has been going on for millennia. 3000 years ago some primitive witch doctor or shaman was making some potion to make his wife boobs bigger. Of course it didn’t work because science. Plastic surgery came along and that was the end of that story, but the intent has always been there, its instinct.

No one has tried to make morbid obesity sexy/acceptable until the past decade

62

[quote]Facepalm_Death wrote:

[quote]marrot wrote:
Meh.

She makes more money slingin those fatkinis than we ever could bitchin about em.

Haters mad because they can’t corner an entire niche market single handedly.[/quote]

Haters are mad because the niche market exists.

Look, I guarantee the quest to make bobs bigger has been going on for millennia. 3000 years ago some primitive witch doctor or shaman was making some potion to make his wife boobs bigger. Of course it didn’t work because science. Plastic surgery came along and that was the end of that story, but the intent has always been there, its instinct.

No one has tried to make morbid obesity sexy/acceptable until the past decade[/quote]

Wrong. Venus figurine from 8000 years ago.

63

[quote]Facepalm_Death wrote:

[quote]marrot wrote:
Meh.

She makes more money slingin those fatkinis than we ever could bitchin about em.

Haters mad because they can’t corner an entire niche market single handedly.[/quote]

Haters are mad because the niche market exists.

Look, I guarantee the quest to make bobs bigger has been going on for millennia. 3000 years ago some primitive witch doctor or shaman was making some potion to make his wife boobs bigger. Of course it didn’t work because science. Plastic surgery came along and that was the end of that story, but the intent has always been there, its instinct.

No one has tried to make morbid obesity sexy/acceptable until the past decade[/quote]

A painting by Peter Paul Rubens, 16th Century. Dunno if I’d call these chicks “morbidly obese”, but my guess is that they’re pushing forty percent on the body fat scale.

64

People with testicles and a penis have been successful in “being identified” as women. There is no reality any more. Part of being a free person is coming to terms with others doing shit that you don’t agree with

65

[quote]Facepalm_Death wrote:

[quote]marrot wrote:
Meh.

She makes more money slingin those fatkinis than we ever could bitchin about em.

Haters mad because they can’t corner an entire niche market single handedly.[/quote]

Haters are mad because the niche market exists.

Look, I guarantee the quest to make bobs bigger has been going on for millennia. 3000 years ago some primitive witch doctor or shaman was making some potion to make his wife boobs bigger. Of course it didn’t work because science. Plastic surgery came along and that was the end of that story, but the intent has always been there, its instinct.

No one has tried to make morbid obesity sexy/acceptable until the past decade[/quote]

Yeah, no. As Varq indicates, fat has represented fertility and wealth throughout most of history.

66

[quote]Varqanir wrote:
A painting by Peter Paul Rubens, 16th Century. Dunno if I’d call these chicks “morbidly obese”, but my guess is that they’re pushing forty percent on the body fat scale.
[/quote]

Just mid-bulk. I’m sure there are contest pics floating aroun somewhere.

S

67

[quote]bpbob wrote:
I’m kind of upset no one quoted me or made fun of me… I’d like to have my posts picked apart too, guys. Play fair.[/quote]

Fine. If you insist.

Having read your post on the first page, I must conclude that you, sir, have a talent for stating the obvious.

68

[quote]Varqanir wrote:

[quote]bpbob wrote:
I’m kind of upset no one quoted me or made fun of me… I’d like to have my posts picked apart too, guys. Play fair.[/quote]

Fine. If you insist.

Having read your post on the first page, I must conclude that you, sir, have a talent for stating the obvious.[/quote]

Damn, Thanks for the laughs.

69

[quote]orion wrote:

[quote]Yogi wrote:
Let’s also not forget that we are posting on a bodybuilding website. A LOT of chicks think bodybuilding physiques are gross.

Does that mean they should rail against us wearing well-fitting clothes that show off our big mussilz?[/quote]

Yeah, but you know how it is…

“I really dont like…”

“Ohhhhh…”

They know what they like when they see it.[/quote]

lol, fair point

70

[quote]Edgy wrote:
sexy is in the mind [/quote]
Yep.

71

Fat is fine, as long as I don’t have to PAY for it.

Obesity is one of the leading causes of health care expenses in the U.S.

We ALL pay for the fatties, one way or the other.

The next time you get an increase in your health care costs, see if you have the same indifferent attitude.

72

[quote]Varqanir wrote:

[quote]Facepalm_Death wrote:

[quote]marrot wrote:
Meh.

She makes more money slingin those fatkinis than we ever could bitchin about em.

Haters mad because they can’t corner an entire niche market single handedly.[/quote]

Haters are mad because the niche market exists.

Look, I guarantee the quest to make bobs bigger has been going on for millennia. 3000 years ago some primitive witch doctor or shaman was making some potion to make his wife boobs bigger. Of course it didn’t work because science. Plastic surgery came along and that was the end of that story, but the intent has always been there, its instinct.

No one has tried to make morbid obesity sexy/acceptable until the past decade[/quote]

Wrong. Venus figurine from 8000 years ago.
[/quote]

Yeah well, we dont really know what they saw in these figurines.

Now I am no anthropoligist but I would wager that “eating” was quite a bit more important than “fucking”.

73

[quote]Yogi wrote:

[quote]SteelyD wrote:
Yeah, but fatkinis are sensible and pragmatic because they double as awesome boat covers.[/quote]

Zakk Wylde overshreds. There’s no love in his solos.[/quote]

Now while I don’t fully understand the UK slang, I think I will just agree with the sentiment.

74

[quote]UtahLama wrote:
Fat is fine, as long as I don’t have to PAY for it.

Obesity is one of the leading causes of health care expenses in the U.S.

We ALL pay for the fatties, one way or the other.

The next time you get an increase in your health care costs, see if you have the same indifferent attitude. [/quote]

I may be incorrect on this, but I remember an article or news item from a couple of years ago that showed that in the long run, healthier people cost the healthcare system more money.

Found it

I can’t comment on the validity of it, too busy right now

75

[quote]MattyG35 wrote:

[quote]UtahLama wrote:
Fat is fine, as long as I don’t have to PAY for it.

Obesity is one of the leading causes of health care expenses in the U.S.

We ALL pay for the fatties, one way or the other.

The next time you get an increase in your health care costs, see if you have the same indifferent attitude. [/quote]

I may be incorrect on this, but I remember an article or news item from a couple of years ago that showed that in the long run, healthier people cost the healthcare system more money.

Found it

I can’t comment on the validity of it, too busy right now[/quote]

I’ll see your small scale study (Norway) and raise you a Harvard U.S. based study.

76

[quote]Varqanir wrote:

[quote]Facepalm_Death wrote:

[quote]marrot wrote:
Meh.

She makes more money slingin those fatkinis than we ever could bitchin about em.

Haters mad because they can’t corner an entire niche market single handedly.[/quote]

Haters are mad because the niche market exists.

Look, I guarantee the quest to make bobs bigger has been going on for millennia. 3000 years ago some primitive witch doctor or shaman was making some potion to make his wife boobs bigger. Of course it didn’t work because science. Plastic surgery came along and that was the end of that story, but the intent has always been there, its instinct.

No one has tried to make morbid obesity sexy/acceptable until the past decade[/quote]

A painting by Peter Paul Rubens, 16th Century. Dunno if I’d call these chicks “morbidly obese”, but my guess is that they’re pushing forty percent on the body fat scale.

[/quote]

It’s one model.

77

[quote]orion wrote:

[quote]Varqanir wrote:

[quote]Facepalm_Death wrote:

[quote]marrot wrote:
Meh.

She makes more money slingin those fatkinis than we ever could bitchin about em.

Haters mad because they can’t corner an entire niche market single handedly.[/quote]

Haters are mad because the niche market exists.

Look, I guarantee the quest to make bobs bigger has been going on for millennia. 3000 years ago some primitive witch doctor or shaman was making some potion to make his wife boobs bigger. Of course it didn’t work because science. Plastic surgery came along and that was the end of that story, but the intent has always been there, its instinct.

No one has tried to make morbid obesity sexy/acceptable until the past decade[/quote]

Wrong. Venus figurine from 8000 years ago.
[/quote]

Yeah well, we dont really know what they saw in these figurines.

Now I am no anthropoligist but I would wager that “eating” was quite a bit more important than “fucking”.[/quote]

The figurines represent fertility and life, not obesity. The swollen breasts and belly symbolize perpetual pregnancy.

78

[quote]EmilyQ wrote:

[quote]Facepalm_Death wrote:

[quote]marrot wrote:
Meh.

She makes more money slingin those fatkinis than we ever could bitchin about em.

Haters mad because they can’t corner an entire niche market single handedly.[/quote]

Haters are mad because the niche market exists.

Look, I guarantee the quest to make bobs bigger has been going on for millennia. 3000 years ago some primitive witch doctor or shaman was making some potion to make his wife boobs bigger. Of course it didn’t work because science. Plastic surgery came along and that was the end of that story, but the intent has always been there, its instinct.

No one has tried to make morbid obesity sexy/acceptable until the past decade[/quote]

Yeah, no. As Varq indicates, fat has represented fertility and wealth throughout most of history. [/quote]

I don’t know what to make of this because I’m convinced I’m genetically predisposed to liking girls thinner. As a child I remember liking girls butts to look a certain way and I’m pretty sure media didn’t imprint that preference on me. I grew up watching tv in the 70s and in the 70s they didn’t even show butts on tv.

They showed so little ass on tv in the that I can even remember the first time I saw nice ass on tv. It was a movie with Pam Dauber that was about a guy and girl who got a hold of some magic watch that could stop time. Pam had a damn sexy ass and that movie might just have triggered me to hit puberty. Mork & Mindy was still running at that time and that movie renewed my interest in watching it. I gave up quickly though because they NEVER showed Pam’s ass on M&M.

The next time I saw nice ass on tv was years later when I was in High school. An episode of Matt Houston where Matt went to some cattle ranch where there were a bunch of models shooting a jeans commercial. That episode may have planted the seed in me to later go on and start the epic SAMA thread Girls in Cowboy Hats (thanks to MaximusB for making that an epic thread).

Point being, in about a 6 year period I saw nice ass on tv only twice so I doubt media influenced my taste. My taste is hard wired. Heck, did we ever actually see Daisy Duke’s ass? I think we only saw her from the front.

79

[quote]MattyG35 wrote:
I may be incorrect on this, but I remember an article or news item from a couple of years ago that showed that in the long run, healthier people cost the healthcare system more money.

Found it

I can’t comment on the validity of it, too busy right now[/quote]

Wouldn’t this be more because of what government provides?

80

[quote]MattyG35 wrote:
I may be incorrect on this, but I remember an article or news item from a couple of years ago that showed that in the long run, healthier people cost the healthcare system more money.

Found it

I can’t comment on the validity of it, too busy right now[/quote]

The proper way to measure this would be dollars per person per year. Not dollars per person over the course of a lifetime. A person that lives longer will also produce more and create more tax revenue.

I don’t mind fat people. But fat acceptance is ultimately disingenuous. If fat people were happy being fat, they wouldn’t need to convince anyone else of the awesomeness of being fat.