[quote]MassiveGuns wrote:
[quote]ZEB wrote:
[quote]MassiveGuns wrote:
[quote]ZEB wrote:
[quote]cloakmanor wrote:
[quote]ZEB wrote:
[quote]MassiveGuns wrote:
[quote]ZEB wrote:
[quote]Headhunter wrote:
It doesn’t take a genius to see that the general market must dominate most investments. Even gold was dragged down by the collapsing market in 2008. Zeb, you might find the best stock in the world but you CANNOT BEAT THE MARKET. Are you Warren Buffett? No? Then you’re going to get sheared.
You really think that you can beat a market that is selling for about 4.6 times book (only the dot.com bubble was higher), a PE of 20, and a dividend yield of 2.15? Its not me that’s calling your plan BS, its the history of the market.
Just like with lottery tix, you might buy some windmill company that get a gov’t contract and makes you a fortune. That’s just dumb luck.
So I wish you luck…you’ll need it. [/quote]
Stocks purchased over a period of time have been shown to be the best investment over the past 200 years. And I know I don’t have to post a 200 year history to prove this. Or, would you like that? So you can move on your merry way singing gloom and doom and I’ll keep making money. 10 years from now I will be worth far more than I am now, and you will be sorry you listened to nut bags.
That’s really the end of the story.
[/quote]
Bullshit. Those statistics are not correctly inflation adjusted.
Sounds like you are pretty set in your beliefs.
The stockmarket is a suckers game, unless you have inside information. Thats how wall-street works. Get everyone to churn up as much business as possible, and make a killing when the inside info comes along.
Average joe is gambling unless you know the game.
The best way to invest is to pick safe income generating investments with a solid return and compound your profits over time.
[/quote]
You have no idea how uninformed you sound. You’re an ignoramus. [/quote]
Having not read the majority of this thread, allow me to ask you what your general stock investment strategy would be ZEB? Do you invest for the “long haul” or “short term”; take-over trading or momentum stocks? (and so forth)[/quote]
Buy and hold has been the best investment strategy over the past 100+ years I don’t expect it to change now. Most people don’t understand economic cycles and they become scared. We’ve had many of these cycles from the 1800’s on. Every time I read another post of gloom and doom I simply laugh to myself.
Ever hear the term “buy when there’s blood in the streets”? Baron Rothschild said that in 1871. He bought stocks (in Paris) during the stock panic of 1871. When all the suckers who were scared began panic selling he doubled up his buying. He amassed a fortune. Remember the market moves on fear and greed. If you are smart enough to take advantage of the situation you can do very well. I am a buyer in this market, as all smart investors are.
[/quote]
The rothschilds made a lot of money, but they were the original insider traders. They made money in all kinds of situations, primarily by selling war bonds. They could only do this by being the most well informed traders at the time, with connections that no-one else had. Comparing joe jerk-off who trades at scott-trade with the rothschilds is retarded.[/quote]
Oh no, please, stop it. I used Rothschild as one example, there so many more. The point is to stay in, long-term, when others are running scared. The average Joe jumps in the market when things look good. When things look rough they run for the hills selling for less than their purchase price. They’re top buyers and bottom sellers. That strategy will never make anyone money. The key is to buy quality stocks and hold them. It’s not hard if you understand economic cycles.
[/quote]
Its always good to know, that on the odd occasion that I do short a stock, there are some buy and hold idiots such as yourself on the other side of the transaction.[/quote]
Yeah we buy and hold idiots don’t know what we’re doing. How much are you worth?
http://www.istockanalyst.com/article/viewarticle/articleid/3245614