Could that be 2 dudes?
I’m fine taking a sip from a chardonnay that used to be a merlot. If you know what I mean. You old cranky Catholics hang out on your own thread.
Hint: it’s you and your wife.
I just realized that that hint will mean nothing if you aren’t well versed in Greek mythology.
1 Like
The first artistic rendition of “Got Your Nose!”.
I’m freakin brilliant. 
2 Likes
We do look good together.
Sculptor got the hair wrong though.
That gave it away. Antiope and Theseus.
All of Western civilization is built on The Iliad, The Odyssey, and The Bible.
4 Likes
Nice job. I didn’t know anything about the statue (or the cross dresser theory) the picture just came up when I searched their names.
To my surprise, the girl in the statue did look like a guy!
Maybe I should post this in the things that make you chuckle thread, but it feels relevant here since it addresses for men who don’t understand women, western civilization, and gorgeous sculptures.
3 Likes
This may be the origin of the term, dork ass loser.
On the would bang scale she’s just a smidge behind the woman from Outlander, but only because she’s inanimate.
They can both carry their own damn bags though.
I lost track of which thread was which, but found this on a womans facebook page I almost had a fling with a couple years ago.
Definitely adds some context and understanding on my part. I was kinda mystified at the time, cuz I’m somewhat acquainted with her husband as well.
Anyhoo,
1 Like
She sounds lovely 
She is! I love hippy chicks, and she’s like, into auras and energy and crystals and handjobs in the car after the meeting.
Whats not to love?
3 Likes
As far as I can tell, she’s a catch.
Not a keeper, but a catch for sure!
I . . . have stories. Then you get to witches. They are awesome.
1 Like
Funny thing. I’d known her for about 15 years before finding out that she was married.
It was only recent to that period of time though (about 2 years ago) that things got direct/almost hands on.
1 Like
I see this sort of thing sometimes. A mixing of abusive behaviors and committed behaviors. I mean, what is non-exclusive commitment? “I hang out with you if I feel like it?” And that’s different from my treatment of strangers how? Why not just not get married? Why apply the label “toxic” to something that’s a perfectly lovely choice for most people?
This:
the idea that a sufficiently intense love should cause you to cease to be attracted to anyone else
Is really what we’re talking about in this thread. My sufficiently intense love for my husband combined with my complete satisfaction in the bedroom are enough to prevent me from being attracted to anyone else.
That’s not to say I don’t find anyone else attractive in the abstract. It’s that there’s no attraction of the magnetic sort. I’m not drawn. I find Andrew Huberman attractive/appealing, but don’t fantasize about touching him.
3 Likes
I completely agree. They try to see if they can shake you. If they can not then they find it very attractive.
This is where a man rises above…. Act like it is of no consequence if she likes you or not. When she is convinced of that, she will start behaving in a way she thinks will attract, not test u.
Personally, in my life I’ve done this both ways and can assure you the way that works best is to act like you could care less.
*couldn’t care less ! And yes